Literature DB >> 22414470

Sensitivity of MRI for articular cartilage lesions of the patellae.

V M Mattila1, M Weckström, V Leppänen, M Kiuru, H Pihlajamäki.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Reliable diagnosis of articular cartilage lesions of the patellae is often based on arthroscopy. However, unnecessary arthroscopies should be avoided. The aim of this study was to assess the sensitivity and applicability of MRI to diagnosing articular cartilage lesions of the patellae.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We identified 74 consecutive males (mean age 21 years, range 18-28) from the medical records of our institute with the sole diagnosis of articular cartilage lesions of the patellae based on arthroscopy. Magnetic resonance imaging was performed with 1.0 Tesla scanner a mean of 4 weeks before arthroscopy. Sensitivity of symptoms, and MRI for the diagnosis was calculated.
RESULTS: Based on arthroscopy, 20 (27%) cases of cartilage lesions of the patellae were grade-I, 32 (43%) were grade-II, and 22 (30%) were grade-III. MRI revealed cartilage lesions of the patellae in 49 knees (66%), indicating that the sensitivity of MRI was 66% (95% CI: 53%-74%). MRI sensitivity increased with the severity of chondral lesions: all grade III to IV lesions were detected (sensitivity 100%, 95% CI: 85%-100%) by MRI. Grade of articular cartilage lesions of the patellae based on arthroscopy was not associated with clinical symptoms (p=0.61).
CONCLUSIONS: The sensitivity of 1.0 Tesla MRI for detecting grade-I lesions was low and could not be used to confirm the diagnosis of articular cartilage lesions of the patellae. For the detection of more severe grade-II to III lesions, the MRI sensitivity was markedly higher. MRI may thus be considered an accurate diagnostic tool for identifying more severe cases of articular cartilage lesions of the patellae.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22414470     DOI: 10.1177/145749691210100111

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Surg        ISSN: 1457-4969            Impact factor:   2.360


  7 in total

Review 1.  MRI of anterior knee pain.

Authors:  Mohammad Samim; Edward Smitaman; David Lawrence; Hicham Moukaddam
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2014-01-29       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Diagnosis and classification of chondral knee injuries: comparison between magnetic resonance imaging and arthroscopy.

Authors:  Marcus Vinicius Danieli; João Paulo Fernandes Guerreiro; Alexandre deOliveira Queiroz; Hamilton daRosa Pereira; Susi Tagima; Marcelo Garcia Marini; Daniele Cristina Cataneo
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-05-10       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 3.  Magnetic resonance imaging is able to detect patellofemoral focal cartilage injuries: a systematic review with meta-analysis.

Authors:  Francisco Xará-Leite; André Vinha; Cristina Valente; Renato Andrade; João Espregueira-Mendes
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2022-10-20       Impact factor: 4.114

4.  Prevalence of patellar chondropathy on 3.0 T magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Eduardo André Gomes Krieger; Francisco Consoli Karam; Ricardo Bernardi Soder; Jefferson Luis Braga da Silva
Journal:  Radiol Bras       Date:  2020 Nov-Dec

5.  New approach for predictive measurement of knee cartilage defects with three-dimensional printing based on CT-arthrography: A feasibility study.

Authors:  R Michalik; S Schrading; T Dirrichs; A Prescher; C K Kuhl; M Tingart; B Rath
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2016-10-31

6.  Investigation of the Relationship between Anterior Knee Pain and Chondromalacia Patellae and Patellofemoral Malalignment.

Authors:  Idil Kurut Aysin; Ayhan Askin; Berna Dirim Mete; Ece Guvendi; Murat Aysin; Hikmet Kocyigit
Journal:  Eurasian J Med       Date:  2018-02-01

7.  Incidence of concomitant chondral/osteochondral lesions in acute ankle fractures and their effect on clinical outcome: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ali Darwich; Julia Adam; Franz-Joseph Dally; Svetlana Hetjens; Ahmed Jawhar
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2020-10-31       Impact factor: 3.067

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.