OBJECTIVES: To compare causes of death (CoDs) from two independent sources: National Basic Death File (NBDF) and deaths reported to the Spanish HIV Research cohort [Cohort de adultos con infección por VIH de la Red de Investigación en SIDA CoRIS)] and compare the two coding algorithms: International Classification of Diseases, 10th revision (ICD-10) and revised version of Coding Causes of Death in HIV (revised CoDe). METHODS: Between 2004 and 2008, CoDs were obtained from the cohort records (free text, multiple causes) and also from NBDF (ICD-10). CoDs from CoRIS were coded according to ICD-10 and revised CoDe by a panel. Deaths were compared by 13 disease groups: HIV/AIDS, liver diseases, malignancies, infections, cardiovascular, blood disorders, pulmonary, central nervous system, drug use, external, suicide, other causes and ill defined. RESULTS: There were 160 deaths. Concordance for the 13 groups was observed in 111 (69%) cases for the two sources and in 115 (72%) cases for the two coding algorithms. According to revised CoDe, the commonest CoDs were HIV/AIDS (53%), non-AIDS malignancies (11%) and liver related (9%), these percentages were similar, 57, 10 and 8%, respectively, for NBDF (coded as ICD-10). When using ICD-10 to code deaths in CoRIS, wherein HIV infection was known in everyone, the proportion of non-AIDS malignancies was 13%, liver-related accounted for 3%, while HIV/AIDS reached 70% due to liver-related, infections and ill-defined causes being coded as HIV/AIDS. CONCLUSION: There is substantial variation in CoDs in HIV-infected persons according to sources and algorithms. ICD-10 in patients known to be HIV-positive overestimates HIV/AIDS-related deaths at the expense of underestimating liver-related diseases, infections and ill defined causes. CoDe seems as the best option for cohort studies.
OBJECTIVES: To compare causes of death (CoDs) from two independent sources: National Basic Death File (NBDF) and deaths reported to the Spanish HIV Research cohort [Cohort de adultos con infección por VIH de la Red de Investigación en SIDA CoRIS)] and compare the two coding algorithms: International Classification of Diseases, 10th revision (ICD-10) and revised version of Coding Causes of Death in HIV (revised CoDe). METHODS: Between 2004 and 2008, CoDs were obtained from the cohort records (free text, multiple causes) and also from NBDF (ICD-10). CoDs from CoRIS were coded according to ICD-10 and revised CoDe by a panel. Deaths were compared by 13 disease groups: HIV/AIDS, liver diseases, malignancies, infections, cardiovascular, blood disorders, pulmonary, central nervous system, drug use, external, suicide, other causes and ill defined. RESULTS: There were 160 deaths. Concordance for the 13 groups was observed in 111 (69%) cases for the two sources and in 115 (72%) cases for the two coding algorithms. According to revised CoDe, the commonest CoDs were HIV/AIDS (53%), non-AIDS malignancies (11%) and liver related (9%), these percentages were similar, 57, 10 and 8%, respectively, for NBDF (coded as ICD-10). When using ICD-10 to code deaths in CoRIS, wherein HIV infection was known in everyone, the proportion of non-AIDS malignancies was 13%, liver-related accounted for 3%, while HIV/AIDS reached 70% due to liver-related, infections and ill-defined causes being coded as HIV/AIDS. CONCLUSION: There is substantial variation in CoDs in HIV-infectedpersons according to sources and algorithms. ICD-10 in patients known to be HIV-positive overestimates HIV/AIDS-related deaths at the expense of underestimating liver-related diseases, infections and ill defined causes. CoDe seems as the best option for cohort studies.
Authors: Catherine R Lesko; Lisa P Jacobson; Keri N Althoff; Alison G Abraham; Stephen J Gange; Richard D Moore; Sharada Modur; Bryan Lau Journal: Int J Epidemiol Date: 2018-04-01 Impact factor: 7.196
Authors: Catherine R Lesko; Stephen R Cole; William C Miller; Daniel Westreich; Joseph J Eron; Adaora A Adimora; Richard D Moore; W Christopher Mathews; Jeffrey N Martin; Daniel R Drozd; Mari M Kitahata; Jessie K Edwards; Michael J Mugavero Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2015-03-12 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: K Ehren; C Hertenstein; T Kümmerle; J J Vehreschild; J Fischer; D Gillor; C Wyen; C Lehmann; O A Cornely; N Jung; S Gravemann; M Platten; J C Wasmuth; J K Rockstroh; C Boesecke; C Schwarze-Zander; G Fätkenheuer Journal: Infection Date: 2013-10-01 Impact factor: 3.553
Authors: Sara Lodi; Dominique Costagliola; Caroline Sabin; Julia Del Amo; Roger Logan; Sophie Abgrall; Peter Reiss; Ard van Sighem; Sophie Jose; Jose-Ramon Blanco; Victoria Hernando; Heiner C Bucher; Helen Kovari; Ferran Segura; Juan Ambrosioni; Charalambos A Gogos; Nikos Pantazis; Francois Dabis; Marie-Anne Vandenhende; Laurence Meyer; Rémonie Seng; M John Gill; Hartmut Krentz; Andrew N Phillips; Kholoud Porter; Beatriz Grinsztejn; Antonio G Pacheco; Roberto Muga; Janet Tate; Amy Justice; Miguel A Hernán Journal: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Date: 2017-11-01 Impact factor: 3.731
Authors: M F P M Albuquerque; D N Alves; C C Bresani Salvi; J D L Batista; R A A Ximenes; D B Miranda-Filho; H R L Melo; M Maruza; U R Montarroyos Journal: Epidemiol Infect Date: 2017-01-09 Impact factor: 4.434
Authors: Belén Alejos; Victoria Hernando; Jose Iribarren; Juan Gonzalez-García; Asuncion Hernando; Jesus Santos; Victor Asensi; Ana Gomez-Berrocal; Julia Del Amo; Inma Jarrin Journal: Medicine (Baltimore) Date: 2016-09 Impact factor: 1.889
Authors: Tiffany L Breger; Jessie K Edwards; Stephen R Cole; Michael Saag; Peter F Rebeiro; Richard D Moore; Joseph J Eron Journal: Epidemiology Date: 2020-09 Impact factor: 4.860
Authors: Antonio Rivero-Juárez; Angela Camacho; Nicolás Merchante; Inés Pérez-Camacho; Juan Macias; Carmen Ortiz-Garcia; Celia Cifuentes; Julián Torre-Cisneros; José Peña; Juan A Pineda; Antonio Rivero Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-07-18 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Kerry Murphy; Donald R Hoover; Qiuhu Shi; Mardge Cohen; Monica Gandhi; Elizabeth T Golub; Deborah R Gustafson; Celeste Leigh Pearce; Mary Young; Kathryn Anastos Journal: AIDS Date: 2013-09-24 Impact factor: 4.177
Authors: Mar Masiá; Sergio Padilla; Marta Fernández; Carmen Rodríguez; Ana Moreno; Jose A Oteo; Antonio Antela; Santiago Moreno; Julia Del Amo; Félix Gutiérrez Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-04-25 Impact factor: 3.240