Literature DB >> 22410475

Individual effects of varying stimulation intensity and response criteria on area of activation for different muscles in humans. A study using navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Magnus Thordstein1, Karin Saar, Göran Pegenius, Mikael Elam.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: When using transcranial magnetic stimulation, a stimulation intensity defined as a certain level above the threshold for activation of a hand muscle is commonly used, disregarding the fact that the areas of activation for different muscles may have varying response characteristics intra- and interindividually.
OBJECTIVE: To study the response characteristics of different muscles and compare them within and between individuals. Also to investigate the effect of varying stimulation intensity (defined in two different ways) and amplitude criterion for response, on the sizes of the activation areas for different muscles.
METHODS: A system of transcranial magnetic stimulation with navigation capacity where the stimulation intensity can be defined in terms of the electric field strength in the tissue was used. Four different muscles were investigated in healthy adults. The threshold for activation at rest (RMT) of the different muscles and their respective areas of activation were quantified using three different stimulus intensities (100, 110 and 120% RMT) and two criteria for response amplitude (20 and 50 μV).
RESULTS: Responses could readily be determined using 20 μV as response limit. The RMTs for different muscles varied within and between individuals. The degree to which the area depended on stimulation intensity differed between muscles intra- and interindividually. All results were statistically significant (P < 0.05 or less).
CONCLUSIONS: The response characteristics vary between muscles within an individual and between individuals for a certain muscle. Thus, for optimal accuracy when delineating the activation area, the investigation should be adapted to each particular muscle.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22410475     DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2012.01.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Stimul        ISSN: 1876-4754            Impact factor:   8.955


  8 in total

1.  The motor cortical representation of a muscle is not homogeneous in brain connectivity.

Authors:  Jo Armour Smith; Alaa Albishi; Sarine Babikian; Skulpan Asavasopon; Beth E Fisher; Jason J Kutch
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-06-19       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  PET-based confirmation of orientation sensitivity of TMS-induced cortical activation in humans.

Authors:  Todd D Krieg; Felipe S Salinas; Shalini Narayana; Peter T Fox; David J Mogul
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2013-06-20       Impact factor: 8.955

3.  Bilateral Assessment of the Corticospinal Pathways of the Ankle Muscles Using Navigated Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation.

Authors:  Charalambos C Charalambous; Jing Nong Liang; Steve A Kautz; Mark S George; Mark G Bowden
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2019-02-19       Impact factor: 1.355

Review 4.  Current and potential utility of transcranial magnetic stimulation in the diagnostics before brain tumor surgery.

Authors:  Thomas Picht
Journal:  CNS Oncol       Date:  2014-07

5.  Forearm and Hand Muscles Exhibit High Coactivation and Overlapping of Cortical Motor Representations.

Authors:  Gabriela P Tardelli; Victor H Souza; Renan H Matsuda; Marco A C Garcia; Pavel A Novikov; Maria A Nazarova; Oswaldo Baffa
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  2022-03-09       Impact factor: 4.275

6.  Neuroplasticity following Nerve Transfer of the Anterior Interosseous Nerve for Proximal Ulnar Nerve Injuries.

Authors:  Erika Nyman; Torbjörn Nyman; Carin Rubensson; Magnus Thordstein
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2021-07-13

7.  Mapping of multiple muscles with transcranial magnetic stimulation: absolute and relative test-retest reliability.

Authors:  Maria Nazarova; Pavel Novikov; Ekaterina Ivanina; Ksenia Kozlova; Larisa Dobrynina; Vadim V Nikulin
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2021-03-08       Impact factor: 5.038

8.  The TMS Map Scales with Increased Stimulation Intensity and Muscle Activation.

Authors:  Mark van de Ruit; Michael J Grey
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  2015-09-04       Impact factor: 3.020

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.