Literature DB >> 22410285

Tug 'O' war: challenges of transverse upper gracilis (TUG) myocutaneous free flap breast reconstruction.

Michelle B Locke1, Toni Zhong, Marc A M Mureau, Stefan O P Hofer.   

Abstract

Autologous tissue microsurgical breast reconstruction is increasingly requested by women following mastectomy. While the abdomen is the most frequently used donor site, not all women have enough abdominal tissue excess for a unilateral or bilateral breast reconstruction. A secondary choice in such women may be the transverse upper gracilis (TUG) myocutaneous flap. This study reviews our experience with TUG flap breast reconstruction looking specifically at reconstructive success rate and the requirement for secondary surgery. A total of 16 free TUG flaps were performed to reconstruct 15 breasts in eight patients over a period of five years. Data were collected retrospectively by chart review. Follow up ranged from 14 to 41 months. During the follow up period, there was one (6.3%) complete flap loss in an immediate breast reconstruction patient. Four further flaps (25%) failed in their primary aim of breast reconstruction, as they required additional significant reconstruction with either deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flaps (two flaps (12.5%), one patient) or augmentation with silicone breast implants (two flaps (12.5%), one patient), giving a successful breast reconstruction rate with the TUG flap of only 66.7%. In all of the remaining reconstructed breasts, deficient flap volume or breast contour was seen. Eight flaps were augmented by lipofilling. A total of 62.5% of the donor sites had complications, namely sensory disturbance of the medial thigh (25%) and poor scar (37.5%) requiring revision. This series demonstrates a high rate of reconstructive failure and unsatisfactory outcomes from TUG flap breast reconstruction. We feel this reinforces the necessity of adequate pre-operative patient assessment and counselling, including discussion regarding the likelihood of subsequent revisional surgery, before embarking on this form of autologous breast reconstruction.
Copyright © 2012 British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22410285     DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2012.02.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg        ISSN: 1748-6815            Impact factor:   2.740


  6 in total

1.  Microsurgical refinements with the use of internal mammary (IM) perforators as recipient vessels in transverse upper gracilis (TUG) autologous breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Samer Saour; Guido Libondi; Venkat Ramakrishnan
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2017-08

2.  Stacked and bipedicled abdominal free flaps for breast reconstruction: considerations for shaping.

Authors:  Nakul Gamanlal Patel; Warren Matthew Rozen; Whitney T H Chow; Muhammad Chowdhry; Edmund Fitzgerald O'Connor; Hrsikesa Sharma; Matthew Griffiths; Venkat V Ramakrishnan
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2016-04

3.  The Conjoined TUGPAP Flap for Breast Reconstruction: Systematic Review and Illustrative Anatomy.

Authors:  Aneesh Karir; Michael J Stein; Jing Zhang
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2021-04-20

Review 4.  Anatomic Variations of the Deep Femoral Artery and Its Branches: Clinical Implications on Anterolateral Thigh Harvesting.

Authors:  Georgia Tzouma; Nikolaos A Kopanakis; George Tsakotos; Panagiotis N Skandalakis; Dimitrios Filippou
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2020-04-28

5.  Age and Overweight Are Not Contraindications for a Breast Reconstruction with a TMG-Flap-A Risk and Complication Analysis of a Retrospective Double Center Study Including 300 Patients.

Authors:  Karl Schwaiger; Laurenz Weitgasser; Maximilian Mahrhofer; Kathrin Bachleitner; Selim Abed; Julia Wimbauer; Elisabeth Russe; Thomas Schoeller; Gottfried Wechselberger
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 4.241

6.  The transverse musculocutaneous gracilis flap for autologous breast reconstruction: focus on donor site morbidity.

Authors:  Laura C Siegwart; Sebastian Fischer; Yannick F Diehm; Jörg M Heil; Christoph Hirche; Ulrich Kneser; Dimitra Kotsougiani-Fischer
Journal:  Breast Cancer       Date:  2021-06-06       Impact factor: 4.239

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.