| Literature DB >> 22408591 |
Young-Gyu Cho1, Jae-Heon Kang, Yang-Im Hur, Jihyun Song, Kang-Sook Lee.
Abstract
Increased adiposity and unhealthy lifestyle augment the risk for type 2 diabetes in children with familial predisposition. Insulin resistance (IR) is an excellent clinical marker for identifying children at high risk for type 2 diabetes. This study was conducted to investigate parental, physiological, behavioral and socio-economic factors related to IR in Korean children. This study is a cross-sectional study using data from 111 children aged 7 years and their parents. Homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) was calculated using fasting glucose and insulin level as a marker of IR. All children's adiposity indices (r = 0.309-0.318, all P-value = 0.001) and maternal levels of fasting insulin (r = 0.285, P-value = 0.003) and HOMA-IR (r = 0.290, P-value = 0.002) were positively correlated with children's HOMA-IR level. There was no statistical difference of children's HOMA-IR level according to children's lifestyle habits and socioeconomic status of families. An increase of 1 percentage point in body fat was related to 2.7% increase in children's HOMA-IR (P-value < 0.001) and an increase of 1% of maternal level of HOMA-IR was related to 0.2% increase in children's HOMA-IR (P-value = 0.002). This study shows that children's adiposity and maternal IR are positively associated with children's IR.Entities:
Keywords: adiposity; child; insulin resistance; lifestyle habit; parent
Mesh:
Year: 2011 PMID: 22408591 PMCID: PMC3290990 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph8124596
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
General characteristics of children. a
| Boys (n = 67) | Girls (n = 44) | Total (n = 111) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7.3 (0.3) | 7.2 (0.3) | 7.3 (0.3) | 0.265 | |
| 18.0 (3.0) | 16.5 (2.1) | 17.4 (2.8) | 0.002 | |
| 21.9 (8.4) | 20.9 (5.9) | 21.5 (7.5) | 0.462 | |
| 59.6 (7.5) | 55.5 (6.4) | 58.0 (7.4) | 0.004 | |
| 89.8 (7.7) | 88.1 (6.0) | 89.1 (7.1) | 0.209 | |
| 5.06 (1.68) | 5.02 (2.05) | 5.04 (1.83) | 0.948 | |
| 1.12 (1.71) | 1.09 (2.08) | 1.11 (1.86) | 0.829 | |
| | 37 (55.2) | 28 (65.1) | 70 (59.1) | 0.303 |
| | 30 (44.8) | 15 (34.9) | 46 (40.9) |
a Values are expressed as mean (SD) or n (%).
b P-value by t-test or Chi-square test (Boys vs. Girls).
c Geometric mean (GSD) computed from log-transformed data.
General characteristics of parents. a
| Mothers | Fathers | |
|---|---|---|
| 37.7 (3.9) | 40.5 (4.2) | |
| 22.9 (3.3) | 24.7 (3.0) | |
| 33.5 (5.6) | 25.3 (5.5) | |
| 77.1 (8.4) | 86.5 (7.7) | |
| 87.6 (7.3) | 94.1 (15.7) | |
| 3.40 (2.22) | 10.17 (2.19) | |
| 0.73 (2.27) | 2.34 (2.32) |
a Values are expressed as mean (SD).
b Geometric mean (GSD) computed from log-transformed data.
Sex-adjusted partial correlation coefficients between indices of glucose metabolism, and adiposity indices of children and glucose metabolism of their parents.
| Fasting glucose | Log fasting insulin | Log HOMA-IR | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| | -0.105 | 0.276 | 0.338 | <0.001 | 0.318 | 0.001 |
| | -0.082 | 0.394 | 0.332 | <0.001 | 0.315 | 0.001 |
| | -0.074 | 0.440 | 0.325 | 0.001 | 0.309 | 0.001 |
| | 0.270 | 0.004 | 0.085 | 0.377 | 0.120 | 0.216 |
| | 0.000 | 1.000 | 0.291 | 0.002 | 0.285 | 0.003 |
| | 0.029 | 0.767 | 0.292 | 0.002 | 0.290 | 0.002 |
| | 0.264 | 0.006 | 0.071 | 0.466 | 0.103 | 0.290 |
| | 0.077 | 0.428 | 0.084 | 0.388 | 0.093 | 0.338 |
| | 0.124 | 0.200 | 0.089 | 0.357 | 0.104 | 0.282 |
a P-value by partial correlation analysis.
Sex-adjusted mean levels of fasting glucose, fasting insulin, and HOMA-IR according to lifestyle habits. a
| Fasting glucose (mg/dL) | Fasting insulin (μU/mL) b | HOMA-IR b | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| 89.1 (1.0) | 5.01 (1.09) | 1.10 (1.09) |
|
| 88.4 (1.2) | 5.09 (1.11) | 1.11 (1.11) |
|
| 89.4 (1.4) | 5.03 (1.13) | 1.11 (1.13) |
|
| 0.832 | 0.994 | 0.998 |
|
| 88.4 (1.0) | 5.20 (1.09) | 1.13 (1.09) |
|
| 89.1 (1.6) | 4.72 (1.15) | 1.04 (1.15) |
|
| 89.8 (1.2) | 4.97 (1.11) | 1.10 (1.11) |
|
| 0.660 | 0.883 | 0.868 |
|
| 89.2 (0.9) | 5.33 (1.08) | 1.17 (1.08) |
|
| 88.6 (1.0) | 4.70 (1.09) | 1.02 (1.09) |
|
| 0.663 | 0.284 | 0.277 |
|
| 88.4 (1.3) | 5.28 (1.12) | 1.15 (1.12) |
|
| 88.2 (1.0) | 4.66 (1.09) | 1.01 (1.09) |
|
| 90.7 (1.3) | 5.49 (1.12) | 1.23 (1.13) |
|
| 0.327 | 0.462 | 0.395 |
|
| 87.6 (1.3) | 4.48 (1.12) | 0.96 (1.12) |
|
| 88.8 (1.1) | 5.14 (1.10) | 1.12 (1.10) |
|
| 90.1 (1.2) | 5.40 (1.11) | 1.20 (1.11) |
|
| 0.386 | 0.457 | 0.376 |
|
| 87.6 (1.1) | 5.08 (1.10) | 1.10 (1.11) |
|
| 91.0 (1.2) | 4.60 (1.11) | 1.03 (1.11) |
|
| 88.0 (1.3) | 5.61 (1.12) | 1.22 (1.13) |
|
| 0.082 | 0.430 | 0.576 |
a Values are expressed as sex-adjusted mean (SE).
b Geometric mean (GSD) computed from log-transformed data.
c P-value by two-way ANOVA.
Results of multiple regression analysis on log HOMA-IR.
| SE | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| -1.345 | 0.414 | 0.002 | |
|
| |||
|
| -0.043 | 0.110 | 0.693 |
| 0.027 | 0.007 | <0.001 | |
| 0.202 | 0.063 | 0.002 |