| Literature DB >> 22408453 |
Anna Alisi1, Anna Pastore2, Sara Ceccarelli1, Nadia Panera1, Daniela Gnani1, Giovannella Bruscalupi3, Mara Massimi4, Giulia Tozzi5, Fiorella Piemonte5, Valerio Nobili1.
Abstract
High-fat and/or high-carbohydrate diets may predispose to several metabolic disturbances including liver fatty infiltration (hepatosteatosis) or be associated with necro-inflammation and fibrosis (steatohepatitis). Several studies have emphasized the hepatoprotective effect of some natural agents. In this study, we investigated the potential therapeutic effects of the treatment with emodin, an anthraquinone derivative with anti-oxidant and anti-cancer abilities, in rats developing diet-induced hepatosteatosis and steatohepatitis. Sprague-Dawley rats were fed a standard diet (SD) for 15 weeks, or a high-fat/high-fructose diet (HFD/HF). After 5 weeks, emodin was added to the drinking water of some of the SD and HFD/HF rats. The experiment ended after an additional 10 weeks. Emodin-treated HFD/HF rats were protected from hepatosteatosis and metabolic derangements usually observed in HFD/HF animals. Furthermore, emodin exerted anti-inflammatory activity by inhibiting the HFD/HF-induced increase of tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α. Emodin also affected the hepatocytes glutathione homeostasis and levels of the HFD/HF-induced increase of glutathionylated/phosphorylated phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN). In conclusion, we demonstrated that a natural agent such as emodin can prevent hepatosteatosis, preserving liver from pro-inflammatory and pro-oxidant damage caused by HFD/HF diet. These findings are promising, proposing emodin as a possible hindrance to progression of hepatosteatosis into steatohepatitis.Entities:
Keywords: emodin; hepatosteatosis; high fat diet; high fructose diet; redox status
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22408453 PMCID: PMC3292022 DOI: 10.3390/ijms13022276
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 6.208
Body weight and biochemical parameters at 5th week.
| Parameters | SD | HFD/HF |
|---|---|---|
| Body weight (g) | 140.8 ± 25.8 | 143.6 ± 23.2 |
| Triglycerides (mg/dL) | 92 ± 13.5 | 104 ± 19.4 |
| Total cholesterol (mg/dL) | 39.5 ± 5.8 | 44.0 ± 6.2 |
| ALT (U/L) | 22.3 ± 3.6 | 25.4 ± 4.5 |
| Glucose (mg/dL) | 65.0 ± 7.5 | 73.4 ± 10.1 |
| Insulin (ng/mL) | 0.23 ± 0.04 | 0.25 ± 0.03 |
| HOMA-IR | 0.92 ± 0.08 | 1.13 ± 0.15 |
Values are means ± SD.
Body weight and biochemical parameters after emodin treatments for 10 weeks.
| Parameters | SD | HFD/HF | SD+emodin | HFD/HF+emodin |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Body weight (g) | 295.6 ± 34.2 | 355.6 ± 28.7 | 308.1 ± 30.5 | 393.6 ± 31.4 |
| Liver weight (g) | 11.2 ± 1.3 | 15.2 ± 1.5 | 12.0 ± 0.5 | 12.4 ± 0.9 |
| Liver weight/Body weight | 3.7 ± 0.11 | 4.27 ± 0.09 | 3.8 ± 0.19 | 3.2 ± 0.2 |
| Triglycerides (mg/dL) | 105.1 ± 18.6 | 138.0 ± 16.3 | 110.4 ± 13.1 | 109.4 ± 15.7 |
| Total cholesterol (mg/dL) | 45.7 ± 7.2 | 48.5 ± 8.1 | 39.9 ± 10.2 | 48.0 ± 12.3 |
| ALT (U/L) | 25.2 ± 5.0 | 37.4 ± 3.9 | 26.0 ± 4.4 | 25.9 ± 5.8 |
| Glucose (mg/dL) | 69.4 ± 4.4 | 81.9 ± 5.7 | 68.3 ± 7.2 | 70.8 ± 9.6 |
| Insulin (ng/mL) | 0.24 ± 0.05 | 0.41 ± 0.09 | 0.25 ± 0.07 | 0.26 ± 0.03 |
| HOMA-IR | 1.02 ± 0.05 | 2.07 ± 0.18 | 1.05 ± 0.06 | 1.13 ± 0.19 |
Values are means ± SD.
P = 0.05,
P < 0.01, vs. SD group; Values are means ± SD.
P = 0.05,
P < 0.01, vs. HFD/HF group.
Figure 1Histological changes of rat liver in each group stained by H-E (Magnification 200×).
Figure 2Plasma levels of TNF-α (a) and IL6 (b) in all groups of treatment. Values are means ± SD. *** P < 0.001, vs. SD group. ‡ P < 0.01, vs. HFD/HF group.
Figure 3(a) ProSSG/Tot GSH ratios were reported. Histograms are the mean value ± S.D. *** P < 0.001, vs. SD group. ‡ P < 0.01, vs. HFD/HF group; (b) Western blotting of total, phosphorylated and glutathionylated PTEN in primary hepatocytes isolated from livers of each group of treatment.
Figure 4(a) ProSSG/Tot GSH ratios were reported as fold induction; (b) Cell viability at 24 h was evaluated by a neutral red assay and reported as percentage compared with the control (SD). Histograms are the mean value ± S.D. *** P < 0.001; ‡ and § P < 0.01, # P < 0.05.