BACKGROUND: Chronically ill patients often experience psychosocial problems in everyday life. A biopsychosocial approach is considered to be essential in chronic care. In Dutch primary health care the current biomedically oriented clinical practice may conflict with the biopsychosocial approach. This study is aimed to explore the views of Dutch stakeholders on achieving a biopsychosocial approach to the care of patients with chronic diseases. METHODS: In a qualitative explorative study design, we held semi-structured interviews with stakeholders, face-to-face or by telephone. Data were analysed using content analysis. Thirty representatives of Dutch patients with chronic illnesses, primary care professionals, policy makers, health inspectorate, health insurers, educational institutes and researchers were interviewed. RESULTS: Stakeholders were aware that a systematic biopsychosocial care approach is lacking in current practice. Opportunities for effective change are multidimensional. Achieving a biopsychosocial approach to care relates to active patient participation, the training of professionals, high-quality guidelines, protocols and tools, integrated primary care, research and financial issues. CONCLUSIONS: Although the principles and importance of the biopsychosocial model have been recognized, the provision of care that starts from the medical, emotional or social needs of individual patients does not fit in easily with the current Dutch health care system. All parties involved need to make a commitment to realize the ideal of biopsychosocial chronic care. Together they need to equip health professionals with skills to understand patients' multifaceted needs and to reward integrated biopsychosocial care. Patients need to be empowered to be active partners in their own care.
BACKGROUND: Chronically ill patients often experience psychosocial problems in everyday life. A biopsychosocial approach is considered to be essential in chronic care. In Dutch primary health care the current biomedically oriented clinical practice may conflict with the biopsychosocial approach. This study is aimed to explore the views of Dutch stakeholders on achieving a biopsychosocial approach to the care of patients with chronic diseases. METHODS: In a qualitative explorative study design, we held semi-structured interviews with stakeholders, face-to-face or by telephone. Data were analysed using content analysis. Thirty representatives of Dutch patients with chronic illnesses, primary care professionals, policy makers, health inspectorate, health insurers, educational institutes and researchers were interviewed. RESULTS: Stakeholders were aware that a systematic biopsychosocial care approach is lacking in current practice. Opportunities for effective change are multidimensional. Achieving a biopsychosocial approach to care relates to active patient participation, the training of professionals, high-quality guidelines, protocols and tools, integrated primary care, research and financial issues. CONCLUSIONS: Although the principles and importance of the biopsychosocial model have been recognized, the provision of care that starts from the medical, emotional or social needs of individual patients does not fit in easily with the current Dutch health care system. All parties involved need to make a commitment to realize the ideal of biopsychosocial chronic care. Together they need to equip health professionals with skills to understand patients' multifaceted needs and to reward integrated biopsychosocial care. Patients need to be empowered to be active partners in their own care.
Authors: Apostolos Tsiachristas; Bethany Hipple-Walters; Karin M M Lemmens; Anna P Nieboer; Maureen P M H Rutten-van Mölken Journal: Health Policy Date: 2010-11-09 Impact factor: 2.980
Authors: Antoine Boivin; Kay Currie; Béatrice Fervers; Javier Gracia; Marian James; Catherine Marshall; Carol Sakala; Sylvia Sanger; Judi Strid; Victoria Thomas; Trudy van der Weijden; Richard Grol; Jako Burgers Journal: Qual Saf Health Care Date: 2010-04-27
Authors: Annemarie Koster; Hans Bosma; Gertrudis I J M Kempen; Brenda W J H Penninx; Aartjan T F Beekman; Dorly J H Deeg; Jacques Th M van Eijk Journal: J Psychosom Res Date: 2006-11 Impact factor: 3.006
Authors: Brenda W J H Penninx; Stephen B Kritchevsky; Kristine Yaffe; Anne B Newman; Eleanor M Simonsick; Susan Rubin; Luigi Ferrucci; Tamara Harris; Marco Pahor Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2003-09-01 Impact factor: 13.382
Authors: Antonis A Kousoulis; Evridiki Patelarou; Sue Shea; Christina Foss; Ingrid A Ruud Knutsen; Elka Todorova; Poli Roukova; Mari Carmen Portillo; María J Pumar-Méndez; Agurtzane Mujika; Anne Rogers; Ivaylo Vassilev; Manuel Serrano-Gil; Christos Lionis Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2014-10-02 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Anneke van Dijk-de Vries; Marloes A van Bokhoven; Berend Terluin; Trudy van der Weijden; Jacques Th M van Eijk Journal: BMC Fam Pract Date: 2013-06-07 Impact factor: 2.497