| Literature DB >> 22403708 |
Ye Su1, Xin Cheng, Yaohong Tan, Yunhui Hu, Yuan Zhou, Juanni Liu, Yuanfu Xu, Yinliang Xie, Caiyun Wang, Yingdai Gao, Jianxiang Wang, Tao Cheng, Chunzheng Yang, Dongsheng Xiong, Hua Miao.
Abstract
Multidrug resistance mediated by P-glycoprotein inEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22403708 PMCID: PMC3293869 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0032782
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Figure 1Schematic illustration of the process that leads to the discovery of PH II-7.
From Danggui Longhui Wan to Indigo naturalis, then to indirubin, the anti-cancer bioactivity was finally attributed to oxindole, the effector moiety of indirubin, which was kept intact in the further modifications that lead to 3 kinds of compounds. Based on compound II, 25 candidates were generated by different modifications, among them PH II-7 was finally screened out by structure-activity relationship analysis and MTT assay.
Figure 2Efficacy of PH II-7 in cancer cell lines.
(A) IC50 value of PH II-7 in various human cancer cell lines. IC50 values (mean ± SD, µM) were calculated from 3 independent experiments. (B) Cytotoxicity comparison between PH II-7 and ADM in five pairs of human tumor cell lines and their MDR sublines. IC50 values (mean ± SD, µM) were calculated from 3 independent experiments. The 5 MDR sublines are A549DDP, KB/v200, MCF-7/ADR, HL60/ADR, and K562/A02 respectively. (C) The IC50 values(mean ± SD, µM, calculated from 3 independent experiments) of Adriamycin (ADM, upper panel) and Vincristine (VCR, lower panel) in K562, K562/A02, MCF7, MCF7/ADR cells, with or without PH II-7 (0.5 µM).
Figure 3Efficacy of PH II-7 in K562 and K562/A02 xenograft tumors.
(A) K562 and K562/A02 xenograft tumors were treated with PBS(control), 25 mg/kg PH II-7, 50 mg/kg PH II-7, 4 mg/kg ADM, separately. The relative tumor volumes (RTV) were measured and calculated over 11 days (n = 5). (B) Relative Body Weight (RBW) of each group (n = 5) (* : P<0.05).
Figure 4PH II-7 induces apoptosis in K562 and K562/A02 cells.
(A) Induction of apoptosis by PH II-7 and ADM (both treated for 24 hours, concentrations indicated in the figure) in K562 or K562/A02 cells. (B) The induction of apoptosis in K562 and K562/A02 cells by different concentrations of PH II-7(300 nM, 600 nM, 700 nM), either alone or in combination with ADM(100 nM).
Figure 5PH II-7 induces S phase cell cycle arrest in K562 and K562/A02 cells.
(A) PH II-7 induces cell cycle S phase arrest in a concentration-dependent manner in K562 and K562/A02 cells, the cells were treated with the indicated concentrations of PH II-7 for 24 hours. (B) ADM induces cell cycle S-phase arrest in a concentration-dependent manner in K562 and K562/A02 cells; the cells were treated with the indicated concentration of ADM for 24 hours. The number of events is plotted against fluorescence intensity (DNA content).
Figure 6The intracellular distribution of PH II-7 in K562 and K562/A02 cells and its regulation of intracellular ADM concentration in K562/A02 cells.
(A) Synthesis of 3-nitrobenzylidene-1-(3-aminopropyl) indoline-2-one (PH II-7-NH2), and the conjugation of it with FITC. (B)The intracellular locations of PH II-7 in K562 and K562/A02 cells at 0.5 hour, 3 hours, and 5.5 hours. Green dots indicate the FITC-labeled PH II-7 derivative. Blue dots indicate cell nuclei. (C) Adriamycin intracellular concentration augmented in a time dependent manner in PH II-7 treated K562/A02 cells. (D) Modulation of ADM intracellular concentration by PH II-7 in K562/A02 cells measured by flow cytometry. The X-axis represents intracellular ADM concentration, while the Y-axis represents the cell count.
Figure 7Regulation of gene expression by PH II-7 in K562 and K562/A02 cells.
The K562 and K562/A02 cells were treated with PBS or PH II-7 (200 nM) for 48 hours, (A)Venn diagrams showing numbers of PH II-7-responsive genes in K562 and K562/A02 cells. PH II-7-responsive genes were defined as genes whose expression levels were up-regulated or down-regulated by PH II-7 (200 nM, 48 hours) by more than 2-fold and were assigned to 6 groups: up-regulated by PH II-7 in both cell lines, K562/A02 only, and K562 only; down-regulated by PH II-7 in both cell lines, K562/A02 only, and K562 only. (B) Genes showed significant expression level change compared with control (P<0.05) in further validation by RT-qPCR. Data represent results from at least 4 separate experiments.
Gene Ontology analysis, over-represented functional classes of genes.
| Up-regulated by PH II-7 | Down-regulated by PH II-7 |
| Cellular process (P<0.003) | Cell cycle (P<0.02) |
| Apoptosis (P<0.03) | Cellular physiological process (P<0.03) |
| Programmed cell death (P<0.03) | Cytoskeleton (P<0.006) |
| Phosphatidylinositol signaling system (P<0.05) |
Figure 8PH II-7 regulates MDR1/P-gp expression through a PKCA pathway.
(A) The expression of MDR1 in K562 and K562/A02 cells with or without the treatments of either PH II-7 (200 nM), TPA (100 nM), Calphostin (1 µM), or their different combinations, detected by RT-qPCR. Expression levels are normalized to that of untreated K562/A02 (as 1) (n = 4). (B) The surface expression of MDR1 in K562 and K562/A02 cells with or without treatments of either PH II-7, TPA, Calphostin, or their different combinations, detected by flow cytometry(n = 4). (C) mRNA expression of PKCA in K562, K562/A02, K562/A02 treated with PH II-7(200 nM), K562/A02 treated with siRNA targeting PKCA, detected by RT-qPCR (n = 4). (D) Western-blot, protein level of PKCA in K562/A02, K562/A02 treated with control siRNA(scramble), K562/A02 treated with siRNA targeting PKCA, K562/A02 treated with PH II-7(200 nM), K562. GAPDH was used as an internal control. (E) Transfection of K562/A02 cells with PKCA-targeted siRNA, resulted in mRNA expression knock down in PKCA, MDR1, and also two transcriptors downstream of PKCA, c-JUN, c-FOS.