| Literature DB >> 22403454 |
David A Wilder1, Kristin Myers, Anthony Fischetti, Yanerys Leon, Katie Nicholson, Janelle Allison.
Abstract
After a 3-step guided compliance procedure (vocal prompt, vocal plus model prompt, vocal prompt plus physical guidance) did not increase compliance, we evaluated 2 modifications with 4 preschool children who exhibited noncompliance. The first modification consisted of omission of the model prompt, and the second modification consisted of omitting the model prompt and decreasing the interprompt interval from 10 s to 5 s. Each of the modifications effectively increased compliance for 1 participant. For the remaining 2 participants, neither modification was effective; differential reinforcement in the form of contingent access to a preferred edible item was necessary to increase compliance. Problem behavior varied across participants, but was generally higher during guided compliance conditions and lower during differential reinforcement conditions.Entities:
Keywords: compliance; guided compliance; noncompliance; physical guidance; preschoolers; prompting
Mesh:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22403454 PMCID: PMC3297331 DOI: 10.1901/jaba.2012.45-121
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Appl Behav Anal ISSN: 0021-8855