Literature DB >> 2240301

Epidemiologic differences between chlamydia and gonorrhea.

H L Zimmerman1, J J Potterat, R L Dukes, J B Muth, H P Zimmerman, J S Fogle, C I Pratts.   

Abstract

To assess the prevalence, demographics, and transmission patterns of genital chlamydia infection, we screened 3,078 patients, and compared identified cases (N = 511) to gonorrhea cases (N = 291) diagnosed in the same setting. Chlamydia cases were younger and more likely to be White than their gonorrhea counterparts. Chlamydia cases were distributed diffusely; geographic overlap between the two diseases was only about 40 percent. Gonococcal coinfection was noted in less than 10 percent of patients with chlamydia. Nearly half of men with chlamydia and four-fifths of women were asymptomatic and most cases were identified through screening or contact tracing. Populations at high risk for chlamydia are seemingly different from those for gonorrhea. Differences may be due to control interventions (active for gonorrhea, passive for chlamydia). Chlamydia case reporting and control initiatives are recommended.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2240301      PMCID: PMC1404909          DOI: 10.2105/ajph.80.11.1338

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Public Health        ISSN: 0090-0036            Impact factor:   9.308


  13 in total

1.  Control of sexually transmitted chlamydial infections.

Authors:  H H Handsfield
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1987-04-17       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 2.  Epidemiology of sexually transmitted Chlamydia trachomatis infections.

Authors:  S E Thompson; A E Washington
Journal:  Epidemiol Rev       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 6.222

3.  Centers for Disease Control guidelines for prevention and control of Chlamydia trachomatis infections. Summary and Commentary.

Authors:  T A Bell; J T Grayston
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1986-04       Impact factor: 25.391

4.  Disease transmission by heterosexual men with gonorrhea: an empiric estimate.

Authors:  J J Potterat; R L Dukes; R B Rothenberg
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  1987 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.830

5.  A new approach to gonorrhea control. The asymptomatic man and incidence reduction.

Authors:  J J Potterat; R D King
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1981-02-13       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  The geography of gonorrhea. Empirical demonstration of core group transmission.

Authors:  R B Rothenberg
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1983-06       Impact factor: 4.897

7.  Gonorrhea as a social disease.

Authors:  J J Potterat; R B Rothenberg; D E Woodhouse; J B Muth; C I Pratts; J S Fogle
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  1985 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.830

8.  Chlamydia trachomatis infections in the United States. What are they costing us?

Authors:  A E Washington; R E Johnson; L L Sanders
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1987-04-17       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Women contacts of men with gonorrhea: case-finding yields.

Authors:  J J Potterat; D E Woodhouse; C I Pratts; G S Markewich; J S Fogle
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  1983 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.830

10.  A civilian-military partnership to reduce the incidence of gonorrhea.

Authors:  D E Woodhouse; J J Potterat; J B Muth; C I Pratts; R B Rothenberg; J S Fogle
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1985 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.792

View more
  34 in total

1.  Do the factors associated with successful contact tracing of patients with gonorrhoea and Chlamydia differ?

Authors:  J D Ross; A Sukthankar; K W Radcliffe; J Andre
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 3.519

2.  Sexual networks and sexually transmitted infections: a tale of two cities.

Authors:  A M Jolly; S Q Muth; J L Wylie; J J Potterat
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 3.671

3.  Spatial analysis and mapping of sexually transmitted diseases to optimise intervention and prevention strategies.

Authors:  D C G Law; M L Serre; G Christakos; P A Leone; W C Miller
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 3.519

4.  Diagnosing Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae infections.

Authors:  M F Stern
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1991 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  Reciprocal sex partner concurrency and STDs among heterosexuals at high-risk of HIV infection.

Authors:  Alan Neaigus; Samuel M Jenness; Holly Hagan; Christopher S Murrill; Travis Wendel
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 3.671

6.  The interrelation of demographic and geospatial risk factors between four common sexually transmitted diseases.

Authors:  E F Monteiro; C J N Lacey; D Merrick
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.519

7.  Comparative geographic concentrations of 4 sexually transmitted infections.

Authors:  Roxanne P Kerani; Mark S Handcock; H Hunter Handsfield; King K Holmes
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 9.308

8.  Sustained influence of infections on prostate-specific antigen concentration: An analysis of changes over 10 years of follow-up.

Authors:  Marvin E Langston; Ratna Pakpahan; Remington L Nevin; Angelo M De Marzo; Debra J Elliott; Charlotte A Gaydos; William B Isaacs; William G Nelson; Lori J Sokoll; Jonathan M Zenilman; Elizabeth A Platz; Siobhan Sutcliffe
Journal:  Prostate       Date:  2018-05-30       Impact factor: 4.104

9.  Validity of self-reported history of Chlamydia trachomatis infection.

Authors:  Ann C Frisse; Jeanne M Marrazzo; Nhial T Tutlam; Courtney A Schreiber; Stephanie B Teal; David K Turok; Jeffrey F Peipert
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2016-12-14       Impact factor: 8.661

10.  Risk factors for genital chlamydial infection.

Authors:  Christine Navarro; Anne Jolly; Rama Nair; Yue Chen
Journal:  Can J Infect Dis       Date:  2002-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.