BACKGROUND: Unintended pregnancy is common in the United States, and interventions are needed to improve contraceptive use among women at higher risk of unintended pregnancy, including Latinas and women with low educational attainment. STUDY DESIGN: A three-arm randomized controlled trial was conducted at two family planning sites serving low-income, predominantly Latina populations. The trial tested the efficacy of a computer-based contraceptive assessment module in increasing the proportion of patients choosing an effective method of contraception (<10 pregnancies/100 women per year, typical use). Participants were randomized to complete the module and receive tailored health materials, to complete the module and receive generic health materials, or to a control condition. RESULTS: In intent-to-treat analyses adjusted for recruitment site (n=2231), family planning patients who used the module were significantly more likely to choose an effective contraceptive method: 75% among those who received tailored materials [odds ratio (OR)=1.56; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.23-1.98] and 78% among those who received generic materials (OR=1.74; 95% CI: 1.35-2.25), compared to 65% among control arm participants. CONCLUSIONS: The findings support prior research suggesting that patient-centered interventions can positively influence contraceptive method choice.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Unintended pregnancy is common in the United States, and interventions are needed to improve contraceptive use among women at higher risk of unintended pregnancy, including Latinas and women with low educational attainment. STUDY DESIGN: A three-arm randomized controlled trial was conducted at two family planning sites serving low-income, predominantly Latina populations. The trial tested the efficacy of a computer-based contraceptive assessment module in increasing the proportion of patients choosing an effective method of contraception (<10 pregnancies/100 women per year, typical use). Participants were randomized to complete the module and receive tailored health materials, to complete the module and receive generic health materials, or to a control condition. RESULTS: In intent-to-treat analyses adjusted for recruitment site (n=2231), family planning patients who used the module were significantly more likely to choose an effective contraceptive method: 75% among those who received tailored materials [odds ratio (OR)=1.56; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.23-1.98] and 78% among those who received generic materials (OR=1.74; 95% CI: 1.35-2.25), compared to 65% among control arm participants. CONCLUSIONS: The findings support prior research suggesting that patient-centered interventions can positively influence contraceptive method choice.
Authors: Judith Stephenson; Julia V Bailey; Ann Blandford; Nataliya Brima; Andrew Copas; Preethy D'Souza; Anasztazia Gubijev; Rachael Hunter; Jill Shawe; Greta Rait; Sandy Oliver Journal: Health Technol Assess Date: 2020-11 Impact factor: 4.014
Authors: Tessa Madden; Jessica Holttum; Ragini Maddipati; Gina M Secura; Robert F Nease; Jeffrey F Peipert; Mary C Politi Journal: Contraception Date: 2020-08-06 Impact factor: 3.375
Authors: Karen Pazol; Lauren B Zapata; Stephen J Tregear; Nancy Mautone-Smith; Loretta E Gavin Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2015-08 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Eleanor B Schwarz; Elizabeth J Burch; Sara M Parisi; Kathleen P Tebb; Daniel Grossman; Ateev Mehrotra; Ralph Gonzales Journal: Contraception Date: 2012-08-24 Impact factor: 3.375
Authors: Natasha Mack; Tineke J Crawford; Jeanne-Marie Guise; Mario Chen; Thomas W Grey; Paul J Feldblum; Laurie L Stockton; Maria F Gallo Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2019-04-23
Authors: Chioma Oringanje; Martin M Meremikwu; Hokehe Eko; Ekpereonne Esu; Anne Meremikwu; John E Ehiri Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2016-02-03