Literature DB >> 22402024

Investigating the subharmonic response of individual phospholipid encapsulated microbubbles at high frequencies: a comparative study of five agents.

Brandon L Helfield1, Emmanuel Cherin, F Stuart Foster, David E Goertz.   

Abstract

There are a range of contrast ultrasound applications above 10 MHz, a frequency regime in which nonlinear microbubble behavior is poorly understood. Lipid-encapsulated microbubbles have considerable potential for use at higher frequencies because they have been shown to exhibit pronounced nonlinear activity at frequencies up to 40 MHz. The objective of this work was to investigate the influence of agent formulation on the subharmonic response of lipid-encapsulated microbubbles at high frequencies with a view to providing information relevant to improving contrast agent design and imaging performance. An optical-acoustical setup was used to measure the subharmonic emissions from small (d < 3 μm) individual lipid-encapsulated microbubbles as a function of transmit pressure, size and composition. In this study, five agent formulations (Definity™, MicroMarker™ and three in-house agents manipulated to exhibit different levels of shell microstructure heterogeneity) were insonified at 25 MHz over a peak negative pressure (P(n)) range of 0.02-1.2 MPa. All agents exhibited distinctly different subharmonic behavior, both in terms of amplitude and active sizes. MicroMarker™ exhibited the strongest, broadest and most consistent subharmonic response, 22% greater in power than that of Definity™ and as much as 50% greater than the in-house formulations. No clear relation between in-house agents' shell microstructure and nonlinear response was found, other than the variability in the nonlinear response itself. An analysis of the response of MicroMarker™ bubbles suggests that these bubbles exhibit "expansion-dominated" oscillations, in contrast to "compression-only" oscillations observed for similar bubbles at lower frequencies (f < 11 MHz).
Copyright © 2012 World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22402024     DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2012.01.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol        ISSN: 0301-5629            Impact factor:   2.998


  15 in total

Review 1.  In vitro methods to study bubble-cell interactions: Fundamentals and therapeutic applications.

Authors:  Guillaume Lajoinie; Ine De Cock; Constantin C Coussios; Ine Lentacker; Séverine Le Gac; Eleanor Stride; Michel Versluis
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2016-01-28       Impact factor: 2.800

2.  Characterization of Adnexal Masses Using Contrast-Enhanced Subharmonic Imaging: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Lauren J Delaney; Priscilla Machado; Mehnoosh Torkzaban; Andrej Lyshchik; Corinne E Wessner; Christine Kim; Norman Rosenblum; Scott Richard; Kirk Wallace; Flemming Forsberg
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2019-11-26       Impact factor: 2.153

3.  Modifying the size distribution of microbubble contrast agents for high-frequency subharmonic imaging.

Authors:  Himanshu Shekhar; Joshua J Rychak; Marvin M Doyley
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Functionalized multiwalled carbon nanotubes as ultrasound contrast agents.

Authors:  Lucia Gemma Delogu; Gianpaolo Vidili; Enrica Venturelli; Cécilia Ménard-Moyon; Maria Antonietta Zoroddu; Giovannantonio Pilo; Paola Nicolussi; Ciriaco Ligios; Davide Bedognetti; Francesco Sgarrella; Roberto Manetti; Alberto Bianco
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-09-24       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Impulse response method for characterization of echogenic liposomes.

Authors:  Jason L Raymond; Ying Luan; Tom van Rooij; Klazina Kooiman; Shao-Ling Huang; David D McPherson; Michel Versluis; Nico de Jong; Christy K Holland
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Biophysical insight into mechanisms of sonoporation.

Authors:  Brandon Helfield; Xucai Chen; Simon C Watkins; Flordeliza S Villanueva
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-08-22       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Mechanistic Insight into Sonoporation with Ultrasound-Stimulated Polymer Microbubbles.

Authors:  Brandon L Helfield; Xucai Chen; Bin Qin; Simon C Watkins; Flordeliza S Villanueva
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2017-08-25       Impact factor: 2.998

8.  Influence of shell properties on high-frequency ultrasound imaging and drug delivery using polymer-shelled microbubbles.

Authors:  Parag V Chitnis; Sujeethraj Koppolu; Jonathan Mamou; Ceciel Chlon; Jeffrey A Ketterling
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 2.725

9.  Fluid Viscosity Affects the Fragmentation and Inertial Cavitation Threshold of Lipid-Encapsulated Microbubbles.

Authors:  Brandon Helfield; John J Black; Bin Qin; John Pacella; Xucai Chen; Flordeliza S Villanueva
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2015-12-07       Impact factor: 2.998

10.  High-Frequency Array-Based Nanobubble Nonlinear Imaging in a Phantom and In Vivo.

Authors:  Carly Pellow; Emmanuel Cherin; Eric C Abenojar; Agata A Exner; Gang Zheng; Christine E M Demore; David E Goertz
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2021-05-25       Impact factor: 3.267

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.