Literature DB >> 22401990

Electrophysiological evidence for phonological priming in Spanish Sign Language lexical access.

Eva Gutiérrez1, Oliver Müller, Cristina Baus, Manuel Carreiras.   

Abstract

Interactive activation models of lexical access assume that the presentation of a given word activates not only its lexical representation but also those corresponding to words similar in form. Current theories are based on data from oral and written languages, and therefore signed languages represent a special challenge for existing theories of word recognition and lexical access since they allow us to question what the genuine fundamentals of human language are and what might be modality-specific adaptation. The aim of the present study is to determine the electrophysiological correlates and time course of phonological processing of Spanish Sign Language (LSE). Ten deaf native LSE signers and ten deaf non-native but highly proficient LSE signers participated in the experiment. We used the ERP methodology and form-based priming in the context of a delayed lexical decision task, manipulating phonological overlap (i.e. related prime-target pairs shared either handshape or location parameters). Results showed that both parameters under study modulated brain responses to the stimuli in different time windows. Phonological priming of location resulted in a higher amplitude of the N400 component (300-500 ms window) for signs but not for non-signs. This effect may be explained in terms of initial competition among candidates. Moreover, the fact that a higher amplitude N400 for related pairs was found for signs but not for non-signs points to an effect at the lexical level. Handshape overlap produced a later effect (600-800 ms window). In this window, a more negative-going wave for the related condition than for the unrelated condition was found for non-signs in the native signers group. The findings are discussed in relation to current models of lexical access and word recognition. Finally, differences between native and non-native signers point to a less efficient use of phonological information among the non-native signers.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22401990     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.02.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  12 in total

1.  Implicit co-activation of American Sign Language in deaf readers: An ERP study.

Authors:  Gabriela Meade; Katherine J Midgley; Zed Sevcikova Sehyr; Phillip J Holcomb; Karen Emmorey
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2017-04-10       Impact factor: 2.381

2.  Lexical selection in bimodal bilinguals: ERP evidence from picture-word interference.

Authors:  Karen Emmorey; Megan Mott; Gabriela Meade; Phillip J Holcomb; Katherine J Midgley
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2020-09-21       Impact factor: 2.331

3.  Tracking the time course of sign recognition using ERP repetition priming.

Authors:  Karen Emmorey; Katherine J Midgley; Phillip J Holcomb
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2021-11-17       Impact factor: 4.348

4.  The role of syllables in sign language production.

Authors:  Cristina Baus; Eva Gutiérrez; Manuel Carreiras
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-11-13

5.  Phonological reduplication in sign language: Rules rule.

Authors:  Iris Berent; Amanda Dupuis; Diane Brentari
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-06-10

Review 6.  Iconicity and Sign Lexical Acquisition: A Review.

Authors:  Gerardo Ortega
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-08-02

7.  Neural Networks Supporting Phoneme Monitoring Are Modulated by Phonology but Not Lexicality or Iconicity: Evidence From British and Swedish Sign Language.

Authors:  Mary Rudner; Eleni Orfanidou; Lena Kästner; Velia Cardin; Bencie Woll; Cheryl M Capek; Jerker Rönnberg
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2019-10-22       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  The ASL-LEX 2.0 Project: A Database of Lexical and Phonological Properties for 2,723 Signs in American Sign Language.

Authors:  Zed Sevcikova Sehyr; Naomi Caselli; Ariel M Cohen-Goldberg; Karen Emmorey
Journal:  J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ       Date:  2021-03-17

9.  Ongoing Sign Processing Facilitates Written Word Recognition in Deaf Native Signing Children.

Authors:  Barbara Hänel-Faulhaber; Margriet Anna Groen; Brigitte Röder; Claudia K Friedrich
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-08-05

10.  Psycholinguistic norms for more than 300 lexical signs in German Sign Language (DGS).

Authors:  Patrick C Trettenbrein; Nina-Kristin Pendzich; Jens-Michael Cramer; Markus Steinbach; Emiliano Zaccarella
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2021-02-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.