| Literature DB >> 22399912 |
Adnan Mujahid1, Helen Stathopulos, Peter A Lieberzeit, Franz L Dickert.
Abstract
Cholesteric liquid crystals (CLCs) are used as sensitive coatings for the detection of organic solvent vapours for both polar and non-polar substances. The incorporation of different analyte vapours in the CLC layers disturbs the pitch length which changes the optical properties, i.e., shifting the absorption band. The engulfing of CLCs around non-polar solvent vapours such as tetrahedrofuran (THF), chloroform and tetrachloroethylene is favoured in comparison to polar ones, i.e., methanol and ethanol. Increasing solvent vapour concentrations shift the absorbance maximum to smaller wavelengths, e.g., as observed for THF. Additionally, CLCs have been coated on acoustic devices such as the quartz crystal microbalance (QCM) to measure the frequency shift of analyte samples at similar concentration levels. The mass effect for tetrachloroethylene was about six times higher than chloroform. Thus, optical response can be correlated with intercalation in accordance to mass detection. The mechanical stability was gained by combining CLCs with imprinted polymers. Therefore, pre-concentration of solvent vapours was performed leading to an additional selectivity.Entities:
Keywords: QCM; cholesteric liquid crystals; optical absorbance; organic solvent vapours; pitch
Year: 2010 PMID: 22399912 PMCID: PMC3292152 DOI: 10.3390/s100504887
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sensors (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8220 Impact factor: 3.576
Figure 1.Representation of cholesteric liquid crystals encapsulating analyte molecule.
Figure 2.A decrease in the λmax with increasing concentration of solvent vapours.
Figure 3.Optical sensor response of CLCs towards molar masses of different analyte vapours.
Figure 4.Optical absorbance changes versus relative QCM response for different analyte vapours.
Figure 5.Selectivity comparison of pure and imprinted CLCs in a cross linked polymer matrix (THF imprinted) for THF and EtOH sensing indicating imprinted one is more selective [5:1] while pure CLCs has [2:1].
Figure 6.Imprinting of different amounts of CLCs embedded in cross linked polyvinyl dibenzene showing that 5% gives better selectivity than others.
Figure 7.Optical response of CLCs embedded in imprinted polymer for THF and EtOH showing enhanced selectivity for imprinted THF than EtOH.