| Literature DB >> 32612901 |
Carina Esteves1, Efthymia Ramou1, Ana Raquel Pina Porteira1, Arménio Jorge Moura Barbosa1, Ana Cecília Afonso Roque1.
Abstract
Fast, real-time detection of gases and volatile organic compounds (VOCs) is an emerging research field relevant to most aspects of modern society, from households to health facilities, industrial units, and military environments. Sensor features such as high sensitivity, selectivity, fast response, and low energy consumption are essential. Liquid crystal (LC)-based sensors fulfill these requirements due to their chemical diversity, inherent self-assembly potential, and reversible molecular order, resulting in tunable stimuliresponsive soft materials. Sensing platforms utilizing thermotropic uniaxial systems-nematic and smectic-that exploit not only interfacial phenomena, but also changes in the LC bulk, are demonstrated. Special focus is given to the different interaction mechanisms and tuned selectivity toward gas and VOC analytes. Furthermore, the different experimental methods used to transduce the presence of chemical analytes into macroscopic signals are discussed and detailed examples are provided. Future perspectives and trends in the field, in particular the opportunities for LC-based advanced materials in artificial olfaction, are also discussed.Entities:
Keywords: gas sensing; liquid crystals; self-assembly; soft functional materials; volatile organic compounds
Year: 2020 PMID: 32612901 PMCID: PMC7329384 DOI: 10.1002/adom.201902117
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Adv Opt Mater ISSN: 2195-1071 Impact factor: 9.926
Figure 1Geometrical shapes of the three main building blocks forming liquid crystalline phases: a) rod shaped, 4-cyano-4′-pentylbiphenyl (5CB), b) disc shaped, benzene-hexa-n-alkanoate derivative, c) banana-shaped (or bent-core), 3:1,3-phenylene bis(4-(4-ethoxyphenyl) diazenyl) benzoate.
Figure 2Schematic arrangement of rod-shaped molecules in typical thermotropic liquid-crystalline mesophases. a) Nematic phase. The average molecular orientation is signified by the dark arrow running along the long molecular axis, namely the director b) Smectic A phase. The director is oriented parallel to the layer normal (here the z axis represented by the blue arrow). Within the layers the molecules are isotropically distributed. c) Smectic C phase. The director is tilted with respect to the layer normal (blue arrow). Within the layers the molecules are isotropically distributed. d) Chiral nematic phase. Here, the pitch is drawn orders of magnitude smaller than in reality. e) Chiral smectic C phase. The sketch to the left depicts in a simplistic way the chiral twist of the director along the helix axis. f) Columnar phase comprised of disc-shaped molecules stacking their cores on top of each other in a hexagonal arrangement.
Figure 3Typical liquid crystalline phase textures of samples prepared on untreated glass slides observed between crossed polarizers using a polarizing optical microscope. a) Schlieren texture of the nematic phase featuring dark brushes and point defects. b) Fan-shaped pattern of smectic A phase. c) Chiral smectic C phase exhibiting a broken fan-shaped texture and line pattern that denotes the existence of a helical structure. d) Focal conic and schlieren texture of smectic C phase. e) Fingerprint texture of the chiral nematic phase. The line pattern is due to the helical structure of the mesophase.
Figure 4Molecular structures of the most common mesogens forming liquid crystalline mesophases and corresponding transition temperatures: a) N-(p-methoxybenzylidene)-p-butylaniline (MBBA), b) 5-cholesten-3-yl benzoate (cholesteryl benzoate), c) D-2-methylbutyl 4–[4-n-decyloxybenzylideneamino]- cinnamate (DOBAMBC), d) 2,3,6,7,10,11-hexakishexyloxytriphenylene (a triphenylene derivative).
Figure 5Schematic representation of a) selective reflection in a chiral nematic liquid crystal. Depending on the pitch length of the helix, the refractive indices of the material and the wavelength of the light, right (left) handed structures can allow the transmission of left (right) handed circularly polarized light through the medium and reflect right (left) handed circularly polarized light. b) The three basic director deformations splay, twist, and bend. c) Definition of the zenithal (θ) and azimuthal (φ) director angles for the characterization of the preferred orientation of a liquid crystal, set by alignment (easy axis) on a flat surface. d) A well-aligned uniaxial liquid crystal between crossed polarizers for the definition of transmitted light intensity upon normal incidence.[
Figure 6Typical director configurations for the nematic mesophase on a,b) flat surfaces, c,d) spherical interfaces and e–g) cylindrical interfaces. a) Planar alignment. b) Homeotropic alignment. c) Bipolar configuration due to planar anchoring in a droplet formation. d) Radial configuration due to homeotropic anchoring in a droplet formation. c,d) The director field is schematically represented by the solid lines. The black dots depict point defects, which are characteristic of the corresponding director profile. The mesogenic molecules are denoted in the inset as red “cylinders” and the anchoring interfaces are shown in blue. e–g) The upper drawing represents an equatorial cross-section of the cylinder and the lower drawing represents a meridional cross-section though the middle of the cylinder. e) Radial configuration with a disclination line along the core for homeotropic anchoring. f) Escaped radial with point defects for homeotropic anchoring. g) Planar bipolar configuration for planar anchoring.
Figure 7a,b) Polarized light and bright-field microscopy images of nematic droplets with homeotropic anchoring. a) The extinction branches match the corresponding directions of the polarizers. b) Bright-field microscopy is used to visualize the core defect of the radial director profile named hedgehog and c,d) planar anchoring. c) The polarized light optical texture of the bipolar droplet depends on the position of the sample with respect to the crossed polarizers. d) Bright field microscopy enables the identification of the two surface defects, named boojums. The scale bar corresponds to 10 μm.
Liquid crystal-based gas sensing devices using solid functionalized surfaces.
| Liquid crystal | Sensing material | Detected analyte | Transduction | Analyte interaction with sensing material | Refs. | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nematic LCs | 5CB | LC film deposited onto chemically modified gold coated glass substrate with SAMs of MUA, covered with metal salts with mixed anions | DMMP | Optical (POM) | Reorientation of the LC due to the disruption of the coordination between 5CB’s nitrile group and the metal ion, due to the presence of the VOC | [ |
| 5CB | LC film deposited onto gold coated glass substrate chemically modified with MUA and aluminum perchlorate | DMMP | Optical (POM) | Reorientation of the LC due to the disruption of the | [ | |
| 5CB | LC thin film supported on a micropillar array[ | DMMP | Optical (POM) | Reorientation of the LC due to the disruption of the coordination between 5CB’s nitrile group and the metal ion (Cu2+), due to the presence of the VOC | [ | |
| 5CB | LC film assembled on top of microgroove patterned amino-terminated organic substrate chemically modified with copper perchlorate salts | DMMP | Optical (POM) | Reorientation of the LC due to the disruption of the coordination between 5CB’s nitrile group and the metal ion (Cu2+), due to the presence of the VOC | [ | |
| 5CB | LC layer supported on a thiol-sensitive layer containing metal ions | Thiol vapors | Optical (POM) | Reorientation of the LC tuned by thiol-Cu2+ affinity | [ | |
| 5CB | LC thin film supported on a micropillar array[ | DMMP | Optical (POM) | Reorientation of the LC due to the disruption of the coordination between 5CB’s nitrile group and the metal ion (Cu2+), due to the presence of the VOC | [ | |
| 5CB | Thin layer of LC on an AEAPS functionalized DMOAP-coated glass slide | Glutaraldehyde | Optical (POM) | Reorientation of the LC due to the reaction between glutaraldehyde and AEAPS | [ | |
| 5CB | LC film deposited onto chemically modified gold coated glass substrate with SAMs of MUA, covered with different metal perchlorate salts | DMMP | Optical (POM) | Reorientation of the LC tuned by competitive binding of 5CB and DMMP to the cations of the metal salts | [ | |
| 5CB | LC film between gold substrates modified with mixed SAMs containing –COOH functionalities | n-Hexylamine | Optical (POM) | Reorientation of the LC anchored at the surface through interaction with –COOH due to competitive binding of NH2 from the VOC | [ | |
| 5CB | LC film between gold substrates modified with mixed SAMs containing –COOH functionalities (1.) or deposited on chemically modified gold surfaces treated with copper perchlorate (2.) | Hexylamine (1.) DMMP (2.) | Optical (POM) | Reorientation of the LC anchored at the surfaces tuned by competitive binding of the VOC analytes to –COOH (1.) and Cu2+ (2.) | [ | |
| 5CB | LC film on top of chemically modified glass substrate with chitosan–copper perchlorate | Ammonia | Optical (POM) | Reorientation of the LC due to the disruption of the coordination between 5CB’s nitrile group and the metal ion (Cu2+), due to the presence of the VOC | [ | |
| 5CB | LC film on glass substrates cover with manganese perchlorate | Chlorine gas | Optical (POM) | Reorientation of the LC due to the disruption of the coordination between 5CB’s nitrile group and the metal ion due to the oxidation of Mn2+ salts to Mn4+ in the presence of chlorine and water vapor | [ | |
| 5CB | LC thin film between glass substrates covered with metal salts | DMMP | Optical (POM) | Reorientation of the LC due to the disruption of the coordination between 5CB’s nitrile group and the metal ion, due to the presence of the VOC | [ | |
| 5CB | LC film on the bottom of polymeric wells modified with aluminum perchlorate | DMMP water | Optical (POM) | Reorientation of the LC due to the disruption of the coordination between 5CB’s nitrile group and the metal ion (Al3+), due to the presence of the VOC | [ | |
| 5CB | LC film on the bottom of polymeric wells modified with metal perchlorates | DMMP water | Optical (POM) | Reorientation of the LC due to the disruption of the coordination between 5CB’s nitrile group and the metal ion, due to the presence of the VOC | [ | |
| E7 | LC film deposited on gold coated glass surface with polymer micropillars modified with lead perchlorate; top glass surface modified with OTS | Hydrogen sulfide | Optical (POM) | Reorientation of the LC due to the disruption of the coordination between 5CB’s nitrile group and the metal ion (Pb2+), due to the presence of the VOC | [ | |
| E7 | LC film deposited on gold coated glass surface with polymer micropillars modified with aluminum perchlorate | DMMP | Optical (POM) | Reorientation of the LC due to the disruption of the coordination between 5CB’s nitrile group and the metal ion (Al3+), due to the presence of the VOC | [ | |
| E7 | LC film deposited on polyurethane microwells functionalized with gold, SAM of MUA and perchlorate salts of metal ions | Organophosphorous nerve agents’ vapors | Optical (POM) | Reorientation of the LC due to the disruption of the coordination between 5CB’s nitrile group and the metals ion (Al3+), due to the presence of competing VOC | [ | |
| E7 | LC film supported between two glass substrates chemically functionalized with gold, a SAM of MUA and gallium perchlorate | Diazinon | Optical (POM) | Reorientation of the LC tuned by competitive binding of the LC molecules and VOC to Ga3+ | [ | |
| PCH3:PCH5 mixture | LC mixture into fabricated microwells with bottom surfaces decorated with lanthanum perchlorate | DMMP | Optical (POM) | Reorientation of the LC mixture due to the disruption of the coordination between LC’s nitrile group and the metal ion (La3+), due to the presence of the VOC | [ | |
| Smectic LC | 8CB | LC thin films deposited on copper perchlorate chemically functionalized gold surfaces | DMMP | Optical (spectroscopy) | Reorientation of the LC due to the disruption of the coordination between 8CB’s nitrile group and the metal ion (Cu2+), due to the presence of the VOC | [ |
| 8CB | LC thin layer on copper perchlorate-MUA chemically functionalized goldcoated glass slides | DMMP | Optical (cross polarized equipment) | Reorientation of the LC due to the disruption of the coordination between 8CB’s nitrile group and the metal ion (Cu2+), due to the presence of the VOC | [ |
Notes.
Copper perchlorate chemically functionalized gold coated nickel micropillar glass slides
Nickel micropillar on top of aluminum perchlorate chemically functionalized gold coated glass slides. 8CB: 4’-n-octyl-4-cyano-biphenyl; AEAPS: N-(2-aminoethyl)-3-(trimethoxysilyl)propilamine; DMOAP: (N.N-dimethyl-N-octadecyl-3-aminopropyl)trimethoxysilyl chloride; E7: Mixture of cyanobiphenyl and terphenyls; PCH3: 4-(trans-4-propylcyclohexyl) benzonitrile; PCH5: 4-(trans-4-pentylcyclohexyl)benzonitrile; SAMs: Self-assembled monolayers.
Surface topography and unconventional geometry.
| Liquid crystal | Sensing material | Detected analyte (gas or VOC) | Transduction method | Analyte interaction with sensing material | Refs. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PYP-606:PYP-701 | LC mixture deposited on top of unidirectional rubbed polyimide on top of silver coated glass substrate | n-alkanes cyclohexane derivatives aromatic compounds | Optical (surface plasmon resonance) | Phase transition of LC in the presence of the VOC | [ |
| PYP-606:PYP-701 | LC mixture deposited on top of unidirectional rubbed polyimide on top of silver-coated glass substrate | m-xylene p-xylene tetrachloroethylene | Optical (interferometry and crossed polarized equipment) | Phase transition of LC in the presence of the VOC | [ |
| E7 | LC film deposited on gold-coated glass surface with polymer micropillars | Nitrogen dioxide | Optical (POM) | Reorientation of the LC tuned by the affinity between gold (substrate) and the VOC | [ |
| 5CB | Thin films of LC supported on chemically patterned microwells in glass, gold, and polystyrene substrates | Toluene | Optical (POM) | Reorientation of the LC due to a decrease in LC anchoring allowing for the relaxation of the elastically strained LC state | [ |
| MBBA Cyanobiphenyl derivatives | LC droplets placed on microscope glass slides covered with polyimide layers or sodium dodecyl phosphate | Ethyl alcohol Acetone Toluene | Optical (POM) | Phase transition of the LC in the presence of the VOC | [ |
| 5CB and ZLI-1132 | LC anchored in open microchannels with defined periodic geometry | Chiral vapors (enantiopure compounds) Natural vapor mixtures | Optical (POM) | Imbalance of the twisted helical director distortions due to VOC interaction and its enantiomeric excess | [ |
| 5CB | LC functionalized PVP fiber mats | Toluene | Optical (POM and naked eye) | Phase transition of LC core due to interaction with the VOC | [ |
| 5CB | LC functionalized PLA fiber mats | Toluene Acetone | Optical (crossed polarized equipment) | Phase transition of LC core due to interaction with the VOC | [ |
E7: Mixture of cyanobiphenyl and terphenyls; PLA: Polylactic acid.
Figure 8Orientational transition upon gas exposure for a liquid crystal supported on a chemically functionalized surface. a) Schematic illustration of the change in molecular ordering of a homeotropically aligned liquid crystal to a planar reorientation, upon gas exposure, caused by the competition between gas and liquid crystal molecules for the binding sites on the aligning substrate. b) Molecular interactions between copper (II) perchlorate (chemically modified substrate) and the nitrile group of 5CB and the imminent disruption by the phosphoryl group of the chemical analyte DMMP (dimethyl methyl phosphonate).
Figure 9Polarized optical microscopy images of a thin film of E7 supported on a gold surface, for NO2 detection in real time. When viewed between crossed polarizers the sensor appears bright before NO2 exposure (1) and dark when exposed to NO2 (2), due to binding of NO2 on the gold that leads the LC to an orientational transition. The corresponding transmitted light response shows the selectivity of the sensor towards NO2, since it does not respond when exposed to other gases such as ammonia, ethanol etc. Adapted with permission.[ Copyright 2013, Elsevier B.V.
Figure 10Aligned mat with coaxially spun PVP-5CB fibers a) before, b) during and c) after toluene exposure. Images on the left were taken when the mat was observed under nonchromatic crossed polarizers (scale bar 10 mm). In the right column, the images were captured during POM observation of the mat using crossed polarizers (scale bar 80 μm). Reproduced with permission under the terms of the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license.[ Copyright 2016, The Authors, published by Taylor & Francis.
Figure 11Schematic representation of the experimental setup developed by Ohzono et al.[ for chiral discrimination of vapors and director configurations within different domains along the zigzag disclination line. The gas vapor is injected through the nozzle depicted in the figure. The response can be monitored via POM. Reproduced with permission under the terms of the CC-BY-NC-ND 3.0 license.[ Copyright 2014, The Authors, published by Springer Nature.
Gas Sensors employing doped nematic systems.
| Liquid crystal | Dopant | Sensing material | Detected analyte(gas or VOC) | Transduction method | Analyte interaction with sensing material | Refs. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5CB | DBA | DBA doped LC pipetted into copper grids placed on DMOAP-coated glass slides | Hydrazine | Optical (POM) | Reorientation of the LC due to a reaction between the dopant and the VOC | [ |
| 5CB | DCB | LC film onto chemically modified gold coated micropillar arrays with SAMs of MUA, covered with copper perchlorate | DMMP | Optical | Reorientation of the LC due to the disruption of the coordination between mesogen’s nitrile group and metal ion (Cu2+), due to the presence of the VOC | [ |
| 5CB | FCB F1 | Thin films of LC supported on chemically patterned microwells in glass substrates or between glass substrates covered with metal salts | DMMP | Optical (POM) | Reorientation of the LC due to disruption of the coordination between nitrile group and the metal ion due to the presence of the VOC | [ |
| 5CB | Copper perchlorate | Copper perchlorate doped LC placed on top of BCB core and epoxy substrate | Ethanol | Optical (custom device) | Reorientation of the LC due to the disruption of the coordination between 5CB’s nitrile group and the doped metal ion (Cu2+) due to the presence of the VOC and increase of LC’s refractive index. | [ |
| 5CB | Lauric aldehyde | Lauric aldehyde doped LC pipetted into copper grid placed on a clean glass slide | Octylamine Butylamine DIPA | Optical (POM) | Reorientation of the LC due to a reaction between the dopant (lauric aldehyde) and the VOCs | [ |
| 5CB | Copper perchlorate | Copper perchlorate doped LC pipetted into copper grid placed on glass slides | DMMP DIMP | Optical (POM) | Reorientation of the LC due to the disruption of the coordination between 5CB’s nitrile group and the doped metal ion (Cu2+) due to the presence of the VOC | [ |
BCB: Benzocyclobutene; DBA: 4-decyloxy benzaldehyde; DCB: 4-pentyl-3′,4′-dicyanobiphenyl; DIMP: Diisopropyl methylphoshonate; DIPA: Diisoproylamine; DMOAP: (N.N-dimethyl-N-octadecyl-3-aminopropyl)trimethoxysilyl chloride; F1: 4-Fluoro-4′-pentyl-1,1′-biphenyl.
Figure 12Representation of the director configuration of 5CB doped with lauric aldehyde (in a range of different concentrations), and confined in copper grids, at the LC/glass and LC/air interfaces. Corresponding polarized optical microscopy images captured 2 h after sample preparation. Scale bar, 250 μm. Reproduced with permission.[ Copyright 2012, Elsevier B.V.
Figure 13a) Chemical structures of 4′-n-pentyl-4-biphenylcarbonitrile (5CB), and 3-fluoro-4′-pentyl[1,1′-biphenyl]-4-carbonitrile (FBC). b) Response times of pure 5CB and 5CB/FCB mixture (90 wt% 5CB - 10 wt% FCB) supported on surfaces coated with 10 × 10−3 m of five different metal perchlorate salts following exposure to DMMP. The last column is an average over all metal cations. Asterisks indicate a statistically significant difference in the results between 5CB and the mixture FCB/5CB. Reproduced with permission.[ Copyright 2017, American Chemical Society.
Gas sensing systems using nematic droplet configurations.
| Liquid crystal(system) | Sensing material | Detected analyte(gas or VOC) | Transduction method | Analyte interaction with sensing material | Refs. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5CB | LC droplets: biopolymeric ionogel thin film on an untreated glass slide | Organic vapors | Optical (e-nose) | Phase transition or reorientation of the LC due to interaction with the VOC | [ |
| 5CB | LC droplets: biopolymeric ionogel thin film spin coated on an untreated glass slide | Tilapia fish deterioration vapors | Optical (crossed polarized equipment) | Phase transition or reorientation of the LC due to interaction with the VOC | [ |
| 5CB | LC droplets: biopolymeric ionogel thin film on an untreated glass slide | Organic vapors | Optical (crossed polarized equipment) and electrical | Phase transition or reorientation of the LC due to interaction with the VOC (optical signal) and changes in the system’s conductance due to interaction with the matrix (electrical signal) | [ |
| 5CB | LC droplets deposited onto glass slides treated with piranha solution (hydrophilic) or OTS (hydrophobic) | Water Heptane Ethyl alcohol | Optical (POM) | Reorientation of the LC within the LC droplets anchored at the glass surfaces, upon VOC exposure | [ |
| E7 (+CNT) | CNT–PDLC thin film on gold electrodes patterned on a silicon substrate | DMMP | Electrical | LC orientational transition, leading to restructure of CNT networks, upon VOC exposure | [ |
| E7 (+CNT) | CNT–PDLC thin film on gold electrodes patterned on a silicon substrate | Acetone | Electrical | LC orientational transition, leading to restructure of CNT networks, upon VOC exposure | [ |
E7: Mixture of cyanobiphenyl and terphenyls; PDLC: Polymer dispersed liquid crystal.
Figure 14Polarized optical microscopy images of liquid crystal droplet patterns formed by spreading 1 μL solution of a) ethyl alcohol containing 1% (v/v) 5CB on a piranha treated glass slide and b) heptane containing 10% (v/v) 5CB on octyltrichlorosilane (OTS) treated glass slide. c) Polarized optical microscopy images of droplet patterns on an OTS treated glass acquired in order to evaluate responses upon VOC exposure: A) in room environment, B) 5 s after incubation in heptane vapors, C) immediate exposure to the room environment, D) after a subsequent 5s incubation in heptane vapors, E) immediate exposure to the room environment again, and F) 18 s after subsequent incubation in ethyl alcohol vapors. Adapted with permission.[ Copyright 2013, The Royal Society of Chemistry.
Figure 15Multicomponent hybrid gel films: a) schematic illustration of the compartmentalization and organization within the gels, showing the ionic liquid–liquid crystal droplets supported on the biopolymer network. b) Sequence of polarizing optical microscopy images of hybrid gel films during exposure to air saturated in hexane and ethanol. VOC injection was performed at 10 s and clean air was introduced at 25 s for hexane and 28 s for ethanol. The scale bars represent 100 μm. Reproduced with permission.[ Copyright 2017, John Wiley and Sons.
Figure 16Polymer-dispersed liquid-crystal sensor doped with carbon nanotubes: a) Schematic representation of the molecular ordering, before and after acetone vapor exposure. b) Comparison of the response of the pure polymer dispersed liquid crystal sensor (PDLC) and polymer dispersed liquid crystal doped with carbon nanotubes (CNT-PDLC) sensor for different concentrations of acetone. c) Influence of film thickness on the response of the CNT-PDLC sensor. Reproduced with permission.[ Copyright 2014, Elsevier B.V.
Chiral liquid crystal systems.
| Liquid crystal | Dopant | Sensing material | Detected analyte (gas or VOC) | Transduction method | Analyte interaction with sensing material | Refs. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CB | – | CLCs polymer[ | Alcohol and amine vapors | Optical (spectroscopy and naked eye) | Shortening of the helical pitch due to due to formation of H-bonds between the VOC and the matrix | [ |
| Licritherm TM1013 | – | CLCs incorporated on a molecular imprinted polymer matrix[ | Methanol | Optical (spectroscopy) and mass (quartz crystal microbalance) | Change in the helical pitch length due to VOC absorption in the system | [ |
| CN | – | CLC film on a glass disk with black reverse side | Acetone | Optical (spectroscopy) | Change in the helical pitch length due to VOC absorption in the system | [ |
| CC | – | CLC-coated styrene plate | Methanol | Optical (spectroscopy) | Distortion of the anisotropic phase resulting in a swelling of the helical pitch due to VOC interaction with the CLC | [ |
| CC | – | CLC film coated side polished fiber | Tetrahydrofuran | Optical (spectroscopy) | Change in the helical pitch length due to VOC interaction with the CLC | [ |
| E7 | S1011 and DBD | CLC-coated PET films | Acetone | Optical (POM & Spectroscopy) | Change in helical pitch length and a subsequent phase transition due to VOC interaction with the CLC | [ |
| E7 | S1011, DBD, and CNT | CLC–CNT hybrid solution on rubbed PET films | Acetone | Optical (spectroscopy) and electrical | Change in helical pitch length and a subsequent phase transition due to VOC interaction with the system. Changes in the electrical resistance of the system | [ |
| MBBA | Cholesterol carbonate | LC[ | Cyclohexane Acetic acid | Optical (optical microscopy) | Phase transition of the CLCs in the presence of the VOC | [ |
| Wacker oligomer | – | CLC dissolved in toluene and deposited on glass slide. Samples were heated up to 120 °C at the presence of air, pure water or solutions of polyacrylic acid | Water | AFM | Surface pattern reconstruction | [ |
| E7 | Optically pure diamine-TADDOL derivative (R,R-1 and S,S-1) complex (1.) chiral binaphtyl dithiol derivative and a nonresponsive codopant – (R)-(+)-(1,1′-binaphthalene)-2,2′-dithiol (2.) | CLC thin film on planarly rubbed with a velvet cloth TAC foil or polyimide-coated glass slide | Carbon dioxide (1.) Oxygen (2.) | Optical (spectroscopy & naked eye) | Change in helical twist power of the chiral dopant due to reaction with the VOC | [ |
| 1,4-Di(4-(6-acryloyloxypropyloxy) benzoyloxyl)-2-methylbenzene and 4-(4-(6-acryloyloxyhexyloxy) benzoyloxy) methoxybenzene | MAA | CLC polymeric[ | (1) Anhydrous TMA, (2) TMA in watersaturated nitrogen gas | Optical (spectroscopy and naked eye) | (1) Phase transition due to disruption of H-bonded polymer network upon exposure to the VOC, (2) Change in the helical pitch length due to adsorption of the VOC in the system | [ |
| RM82 and RM105 | LC756 | Hydrogen-bridged CLC polymer networks with a porosity printed on TAC films | Alcohol vapors | Optical (spectroscopy) | Change in helical pitch length due to absorption of the VOC in the system | [ |
| COC | Dodecylamine | CLCs doped with dodecylamine pasted onto clean or DMOAP-coated glass slides (reverse side black). CLC doped films covered with PDMS followed by glass slides | Aldehyde vapors | Optical (spectroscopy & naked eye) | Color change due to a reaction between the dopant (dodecylamine) and the VOC | [ |
| CN | Oleic acid (1.) Oleyl amine (2.) Mono cholesteryl terephthaloyl chloride (3.) Cholesteryl phenyl hydrazide (4.) Cholesterol (5.) Cholesteryl chloroformate (5.) Methyl linolenate (6.) | CLC film onto thin Mylar film with black reverse side | Hydrochloric acid (1.) Hydrogen fluoride (2.) Hydrazine (3.) Unsymmetrical dimethyl hydrazine (4.) Nitrogen dioxide (5.) Nitric acid (6.) | Optical (naked eye) | Color change due to interactions with the VOC | [ |
| E7 | R,R-TADDOLphenylhydrazine complex | LC-dopant mixture spin-coated onto polyimide-coated glass slides, previously rubbed with a velvet cloth | Acetone | Optical (spectroscopy) | Change in the helical twisting power due to a reaction between the dopant and the VOC | [ |
| E E1[ | Magnetite NPs | LC doped with magnetite NPs absorbed into mesoporous alumina matrix | Carbon monoxide | Optical (spectroscopy) | Change in helical pitch length due to VOC interaction with dopant (magnetite NPs) and with the LC | [ |
| E E1e) | Magnetite NPs | LC doped with magnetite NPs absorbed into silicon dioxide nanocomposite | Carbon monoxide | Optical (spectroscopy) | Change in helical pitch length due to VOC interaction with dopant (magnetite NPs) and with the LC | [ |
| CLC-2103L | Magnetite NPs | LC doped with magnetite NPs into optically transparent porous material | Carbon monoxide | Optical (spectroscopy) | Change in helical pitch length due to VOC interaction with dopant (magnetite NPs) and with the LC | [ |
| Schiff-bases (azomethine), Demus esters, tolans (diphenylacetylene), phenylcyclohecyls, and bicyclohexanes derived LC | DDS-1015L & NYC-22133L | CLCs spin coated on a rubbed polyimidecoated glass substrate | Toluene | Optical (spectroscopy) | Change in helical pitch length upon interaction of the VOC with the CLC | [ |
| CN | LCR-262[ | LC films on structuresupporting polymers[ | Amine vapors | Optical (photometry and spectroscopy) | Change in helical pitch length upon interaction of the VOC with the CLC | [ |
UV curable polymer Norland Optical Adhesive 61 (NOA61) and glass slide covered by another glass slide; separation distance between glasses kept by using two pieces of polyethylene spacer
Divinylbenzene (cross linker), styrene (monomers), AIBN (initiator) and tetrahydrofuran (solvent)
CLC mixtures composed of MBBA, derivatives of cholesterol and Wacker oligomer (glass-forming compound). CLC compositions → CLC-A: cholesterol carbonate (77%) and cholesterol chloride (23%); CLC-B: MBBA (59%) and CLC-C (41%); CLC-C: MBBA (80%) and Wacker oligomer (20%); CLC-D: CLC-A (90%) and Wacker oligomer (10%); CLC-E: CLC-A (80%) and Wacker oligomer (20%); CLC-F: CLC-A (65%) and Wacker oligomer (35%)
Other chemicals used for the CLC film: 1,4-Di(4-(6-acryloyloxypropyloxy)benzoyloxy)-2-methylbenzene (crosslinker), 4-(6-acyloyloxyhexyloxy)benzoic acid and 4-(6-acyloyloxyhexyloxy)-2-methylbenzoic acid (polymerizable benzoic acid derivative), Irgacure 369 (photoinitiator), hydroquinone monomethyl ether (thermal inhibitor) and tetrahydrofuran (solvent)
Chiral LC mixture containing multiple chiral cyano-biphenyl, cyano-terphenyl derivatives, with a chiral mesophase range of 282–318 K and optical anisotropy Δn 0.234 at 589 nm, 273 K
CB with a trifluoroacetyl receptor attached to a benzene moiety
PMMA and EG80A (polyurethane hydrogel) and hexamethyldisilazane. CB: Cholesteryl benzoate; CC: Cholesteryl chloride; CN: Cholesteryl nonanoate; CCA: Cholesteryl carbonate; COC: Cholesteryl olelyl carbonate; CLC: Chiral liquid crystal; DMOAP: (N.N-dimethyl-N-octadecyl-3-aminopropyl)trimethoxysilyl chloride; E7: Mixture of cyanobiphenyl and terphenyls; MAA: R(+)-3-methyladipic acid; NPs: Nanoparticles; PDMS: Poly(dimethylsiloxane); PET: Polyethylene terephthalate; TAC: Triacetyl cellulose; TMA: Trimethylamine.
Figure 17Schematic representation of swelling of the chiral liquid crystal system which leads to an alteration in magnitude of the chiral pitch, upon interaction with gas molecules. Redrawn from Shibaev et al.[
Figure 18a) Chiral dopant containing diamine groups (1) that transforms into a carbamate (2) upon CO2 exposure. b) Complex chiral dopant 1.3 (produced via mixing 3, a TADDOL derivative, with 1) used by Han et al.[ to dope E7 (LC host). c) Transmission spectra of E7 samples doped with 1.3 and 3, before (closed symbols) and after (open symbols) exposure to CO2. d) Images of an E7 sample doped with 1, before (top) and after (bottom) exposure to CO2 for 1h. Reproduced with permission.[ Copyright 2010, American Chemical Society.
Figure 19Color changes of six chiral liquid crystal droplets with different compositions (from A to F) as observed with polarizing optical Microscopy. a) Initial state, b) response to 5 μL of cyclohexane, c) response to 10 μL of cyclohexane. Reproduced with permission.[ Copyright 2019, Taylor & Francis.