BACKGROUND: Advancing age is a strong risk factor for the development of atrial fibrillation (AF). However, its impact on the left atrial (LA) substrate in patients is not well defined. METHODS: Forty-seven patients underwent catheter ablation of persistent AF. Bipolar electrograms from the LA were recorded for voltage analysis. The AF cycle length was determined by averaging the cycle lengths of ten fibrillatory ("f") waves on lead V(1). The mean amplitude of the same ten "f" waves was also determined. The ablation strategy consisted of pulmonary vein isolation, electrogram guided, and linear ablation. RESULTS: There was an inverse relationship between the mean bipolar LA voltage and age (R = -0.58; P < 0.0001). There was a direct relationship between AF cycle length and age (R = 0.74; P < 0.0001). There was an inverse relationship between amplitude of the "f" waves and age (R = -0.62; P < 0.0001). Areas of scar were found in 15 of the 47 patients (32%). AF cycle length was longer in patients with vs. those without scar (183 ± 20 vs. 151 ± 15 ms; P < 0.0001). Advancing age was the only predictor of LA scar (OR, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.11-1.58; P < 0.01). Forty patients (85%) remain arrhythmia-free without antiarrhythmic medications after a mean follow-up of 18 ± 10 months. Neither age nor LA scar was associated with outcome. CONCLUSIONS: In patients undergoing ablation of persistent AF, advancing age makes for a complex LA substrate that is characterized by areas of low voltage/scar, and yet is associated with a lower AF frequency. LA scar did not seem to impact outcome in this small study.
BACKGROUND: Advancing age is a strong risk factor for the development of atrial fibrillation (AF). However, its impact on the left atrial (LA) substrate in patients is not well defined. METHODS: Forty-seven patients underwent catheter ablation of persistent AF. Bipolar electrograms from the LA were recorded for voltage analysis. The AF cycle length was determined by averaging the cycle lengths of ten fibrillatory ("f") waves on lead V(1). The mean amplitude of the same ten "f" waves was also determined. The ablation strategy consisted of pulmonary vein isolation, electrogram guided, and linear ablation. RESULTS: There was an inverse relationship between the mean bipolar LA voltage and age (R = -0.58; P < 0.0001). There was a direct relationship between AF cycle length and age (R = 0.74; P < 0.0001). There was an inverse relationship between amplitude of the "f" waves and age (R = -0.62; P < 0.0001). Areas of scar were found in 15 of the 47 patients (32%). AF cycle length was longer in patients with vs. those without scar (183 ± 20 vs. 151 ± 15 ms; P < 0.0001). Advancing age was the only predictor of LA scar (OR, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.11-1.58; P < 0.01). Forty patients (85%) remain arrhythmia-free without antiarrhythmic medications after a mean follow-up of 18 ± 10 months. Neither age nor LA scar was associated with outcome. CONCLUSIONS: In patients undergoing ablation of persistent AF, advancing age makes for a complex LA substrate that is characterized by areas of low voltage/scar, and yet is associated with a lower AF frequency. LA scar did not seem to impact outcome in this small study.
Authors: Atul Verma; Oussama M Wazni; Nassir F Marrouche; David O Martin; Fethi Kilicaslan; Stephen Minor; Robert A Schweikert; Walid Saliba; Jennifer Cummings; J David Burkhardt; Mandeep Bhargava; William A Belden; Ahmad Abdul-Karim; Andrea Natale Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2005-01-18 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Isabelle Nault; Nicolas Lellouche; Seiichiro Matsuo; Sébastien Knecht; Matthew Wright; Kang-Teng Lim; Frederic Sacher; Pyotr Platonov; Antoine Deplagne; Pierre Bordachar; Nicolas Derval; Mark D O'Neill; George J Klein; Mélèze Hocini; Pierre Jaïs; Jacques Clémenty; Michel Haïssaguerre Journal: J Interv Card Electrophysiol Date: 2009-04-30 Impact factor: 1.900
Authors: Peter M Kistler; Prashanthan Sanders; Simon P Fynn; Irene H Stevenson; Steven J Spence; Jitendra K Vohra; Paul B Sparks; Jonathan M Kalman Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2004-07-07 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Andrea Corrado; Dimpi Patel; Lucie Riedlbauchova; Tamer S Fahmy; Sakis Themistoclakis; Aldo Bonso; Antonio Rossillo; Steven Hao; Robert A Schweikert; Jennifer E Cummings; Mandeep Bhargava; David Burkhardt; Walid Saliba; Antonio Raviele; Andrea Natale Journal: J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol Date: 2008-03-21
Authors: Michael F Swartz; Gregory W Fink; Charles J Lutz; Steven M Taffet; Omer Berenfeld; Karen L Vikstrom; Kimberly Kasprowicz; Luna Bhatta; Ferenc Puskas; Jérôme Kalifa; José Jalife Journal: Heart Rhythm Date: 2009-06-17 Impact factor: 6.343
Authors: Martin K Stiles; Bobby John; Christopher X Wong; Pawel Kuklik; Anthony G Brooks; Dennis H Lau; Hany Dimitri; Kurt C Roberts-Thomson; Lauren Wilson; Paolo De Sciscio; Glenn D Young; Prashanthan Sanders Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2009-04-07 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Erica Zado; David J Callans; Michael Riley; Mathew Hutchinson; Fermin Garcia; Rupa Bala; David Lin; Joshua Cooper; Ralph Verdino; Andrea M Russo; Sanjay Dixit; Edward Gerstenfeld; Francis E Marchlinski Journal: J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol Date: 2008-05-05
Authors: Robert S Oakes; Troy J Badger; Eugene G Kholmovski; Nazem Akoum; Nathan S Burgon; Eric N Fish; Joshua J E Blauer; Swati N Rao; Edward V R DiBella; Nathan M Segerson; Marcos Daccarett; Jessiciah Windfelder; Christopher J McGann; Dennis Parker; Rob S MacLeod; Nassir F Marrouche Journal: Circulation Date: 2009-03-23 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: S Ammar; G Hessling; M Paulik; T Reents; R Dillier; A Buiatti; V Semmler; C Kolb; B Haller; I Deisenhofer Journal: J Interv Card Electrophysiol Date: 2014-07-10 Impact factor: 1.900