PURPOSE: Complex fractionated atrial electrograms (CFAEs) and high dominant frequency sites during atrial fibrillation (AF-HDF) are related to the maintenance of atrial fibrillation (AF). HDF sites in sinus rhythm (SR-HDF; as defined by frequencies of >70 Hz) are suggested to be abnormal atrial tissue. Relations between these electrophysiologic signals have not been elucidated. METHODS: We investigated the relations between SR-HDF and CFAE and AF-HDF sites during AF. NavX-based maps of CFAE and left atrium (LA)/pulmonary vein (PV) dominant frequency (DF) during AF and DF maps during SR were created for 23 patients with AF (paroxysmal AF (PAF), n = 14; persistent AF (PerAF), n = 9). RESULTS: The extent of overlap between SR-HDF and CFAE sites was 51 ± 18 % (as calculated by the LA/PV segments containing both an SR-HDF site and a CFAE site/total LA/PV segments containing an CFAE site) and the extent of overlap between SR-HDF and AF-HDF sites was 50 ± 35 % (P = 0.7464). However, statistically poor agreement was noted for both (kappa values, 0.07 ± 0.19 and 0.08 ± 0.24, P = 0.8794). The extent of overlap did not differ between PAF and PerAF patients (SR-HDF and CFAE, 52 % (interquartile range (IQR), 42-59) versus 57 % (IQR, 33-67), P = 0.5842; SR-HDF and AF-HDF, 43 % (IQR, 25-85) versus 55 % (IQR, 13-83), P = 0.9465). The bipolar voltage amplitudes of SR-HDF, CFAE, and AF-HDF sites revealed normal voltage areas (1.6 mV (IQR, 0.8-2.7), 1.9 mV (IQR, 1.1-2.8), and 1.5 mV (IQR, 1.7-2.7), respectively). CONCLUSIONS: In both PAF and PerAF, most CFAE and AF-HDF sites did not correspond to the SR-HDF sites or low-voltage area during SR. Thus, most CFAE and DF signals during AF represent functional electrical activities rather than structural remodeling of the atria.
PURPOSE: Complex fractionated atrial electrograms (CFAEs) and high dominant frequency sites during atrial fibrillation (AF-HDF) are related to the maintenance of atrial fibrillation (AF). HDF sites in sinus rhythm (SR-HDF; as defined by frequencies of >70 Hz) are suggested to be abnormal atrial tissue. Relations between these electrophysiologic signals have not been elucidated. METHODS: We investigated the relations between SR-HDF and CFAE and AF-HDF sites during AF. NavX-based maps of CFAE and left atrium (LA)/pulmonary vein (PV) dominant frequency (DF) during AF and DF maps during SR were created for 23 patients with AF (paroxysmal AF (PAF), n = 14; persistent AF (PerAF), n = 9). RESULTS: The extent of overlap between SR-HDF and CFAE sites was 51 ± 18 % (as calculated by the LA/PV segments containing both an SR-HDF site and a CFAE site/total LA/PV segments containing an CFAE site) and the extent of overlap between SR-HDF and AF-HDF sites was 50 ± 35 % (P = 0.7464). However, statistically poor agreement was noted for both (kappa values, 0.07 ± 0.19 and 0.08 ± 0.24, P = 0.8794). The extent of overlap did not differ between PAF and PerAF patients (SR-HDF and CFAE, 52 % (interquartile range (IQR), 42-59) versus 57 % (IQR, 33-67), P = 0.5842; SR-HDF and AF-HDF, 43 % (IQR, 25-85) versus 55 % (IQR, 13-83), P = 0.9465). The bipolar voltage amplitudes of SR-HDF, CFAE, and AF-HDF sites revealed normal voltage areas (1.6 mV (IQR, 0.8-2.7), 1.9 mV (IQR, 1.1-2.8), and 1.5 mV (IQR, 1.7-2.7), respectively). CONCLUSIONS: In both PAF and PerAF, most CFAE and AF-HDF sites did not correspond to the SR-HDF sites or low-voltage area during SR. Thus, most CFAE and DF signals during AF represent functional electrical activities rather than structural remodeling of the atria.
Authors: Michel Haïssaguerre; Prashanthan Sanders; Mélèze Hocini; Yoshihide Takahashi; Martin Rotter; Frederic Sacher; Thomas Rostock; Li-Fern Hsu; Pierre Bordachar; Sylvain Reuter; Raymond Roudaut; Jacques Clémenty; Pierre Jaïs Journal: J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol Date: 2005-11
Authors: Shang-Jin Kim; Stéphanie C M Choisy; Palash Barman; Haifei Zhang; Jules C Hancox; Sandra A Jones; Andrew F James Journal: Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol Date: 2011-08-23
Authors: Keiji Ujino; Marion E Barnes; Stephen S Cha; Andrew P Langins; Kent R Bailey; James B Seward; Teresa S M Tsang Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 2006-09-07 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: Mark D O'Neill; Pierre Jaïs; Yoshihide Takahashi; Anders Jönsson; Frédéric Sacher; Mélèze Hocini; Prashanthan Sanders; Thomas Rostock; Martin Rotter; Andrej Pernat; Jacques Clémenty; Michel Haïssaguerre Journal: J Interv Card Electrophysiol Date: 2006-11-14 Impact factor: 1.900