Literature DB >> 2239908

Maternal employment and reproductive risk factors.

D A Savitz1, E A Whelan, A S Rowland, R C Kleckner.   

Abstract

Studies of reproductive hazards in the workplace must address potential biases related to selection for employment. The National Natality Survey, a probability sample of live births to married women in 1980, was used to examine the relation between female employment during pregnancy and factors that might affect reproductive outcome by analyzing the 5,927 women with complete occupational data. Demographic and behavioral attributes as well as reproductive history were compared for the 3,712 women employed and the 2,215 women not employed during pregnancy. Employed mothers were of more optimal reproductive age, were more highly educated, had higher incomes, began prenatal care earlier, had greater weight gain during pregnancy, and were slightly less likely to be heavy smokers. Employed women had markedly fewer previous births and less favorable reproductive histories (more stillbirths, miscarriages, and induced abortions) than unemployed women, controlling for gravidity. Full- and part-time workers were similar with regard to demographic and behavioral characteristics, but part-time workers had higher parity. Differences were noted by employment sector: professional women had especially favorable demographic and behavioral traits, and women employed as operatives and service workers were less advantaged. These results indicate that substantial differences in pregnancy-related risk factors exist in relation to employment, with working women generally having more favorable demographic and behavioral characteristics and less favorable reproductive histories. This pattern could produce selection bias in studies of work and reproductive health, and it encourages the restriction of comparison groups to other employed women, with a need to consider heterogeneity among working women as well.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2239908     DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a115736

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Epidemiol        ISSN: 0002-9262            Impact factor:   4.897


  11 in total

1.  Characteristics of maternal employment during pregnancy: effects on low birthweight.

Authors:  M D Peoples-Sheps; E Siegel; C M Suchindran; H Origasa; A Ware; A Barakat
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Risk of spontaneous abortion in women occupationally exposed to anaesthetic gases: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  J F Boivin
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 4.402

3.  Employment, job strain, and preterm delivery among women in North Carolina.

Authors:  K M Brett; D S Strogatz; D A Savitz
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Congenital malformations and maternal occupation: a registry based case-control study.

Authors:  F Bianchi; D Cianciulli; A Pierini; A Seniori Costantini
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 4.402

5.  Factors associated with employment status before and during pregnancy: Implications for studies of pregnancy outcomes.

Authors:  Carissa M Rocheleau; Stephen J Bertke; Christina C Lawson; Paul A Romitti; Tania A Desrosiers; Aaron J Agopian; Erin Bell; Suzanne M Gilboa
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 2.214

6.  Reproductive outcomes among male and female workers at an aluminum smelter.

Authors:  Carine J Sakr; Oyebode A Taiwo; Deron H Galusha; Martin D Slade; Martha G Fiellin; Felicia Bayer; David A Savitz; Mark R Cullen
Journal:  J Occup Environ Med       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 2.162

7.  Employment, working conditions, and preterm birth: results from the Europop case-control survey.

Authors:  M J Saurel-Cubizolles; J Zeitlin; N Lelong; E Papiernik; G C Di Renzo; G Bréart
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 3.710

8.  Employment patterns and timing of birth in women with high-risk pregnancies.

Authors:  J M Youngblut; E A Madigan; D F Neff; W Deoisres; P Siripul; D Brooten
Journal:  J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs       Date:  2000 Mar-Apr

9.  Does unemployment in family affect pregnancy outcome in conditions of high quality maternity care?

Authors:  Kaisa Raatikainen; Nonna Heiskanen; Seppo Heinonen
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2006-02-24       Impact factor: 3.295

10.  Physical hazards in employment and pregnancy outcome.

Authors:  Bratati Banerjee
Journal:  Indian J Community Med       Date:  2009-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.