Literature DB >> 22397346

Worrying about terrorism and other acute environmental health hazard events.

Michael Greenberg1, Lauren Babcock-Dunning.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To better understand why some people worry more about terrorism compared with others, we measured how much US residents worried about a terrorist event in their area and examined the association of their fears with their concerns about acute and chronic hazards and other correlates.
METHODS: In 2008 (n = 600) and 2010 (n = 651), we performed a random-digit dialing national landline telephone survey. We asked about worries about terrorism and 5 other environmental health hazard issues. We also collected demographic and socioeconomic data.
RESULTS: Only 15% worried "a great deal" about a terrorist event in their area and 18% to 33% were greatly concerned about other environmental issues. Fear about acute hazard events was a stronger predictor of a great deal of concern about terrorism than were age, race/ethnicity, gender, educational achievement, and other correlates.
CONCLUSIONS: Those who worried most about acute environmental health hazard events were most likely to worry about terrorism. Also, those who were older, poorer, Blacks, or Latinos, or who lived in populous urban areas felt they were most vulnerable to terrorist attacks. We recommend methods to involve US citizens as part of disaster planning.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22397346      PMCID: PMC3489373          DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2011.300434

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Public Health        ISSN: 0090-0036            Impact factor:   9.308


  16 in total

1.  Evolving judgments of terror risks: foresight, hindsight, and emotion.

Authors:  Baruch Fischhoff; Roxana M Gonzalez; Jennifer S Lerner; Deborah A Small
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Appl       Date:  2005-06

2.  Differences in individual-level terrorism preparedness in Los Angeles County.

Authors:  David P Eisenman; Cheryl Wold; Jonathan Fielding; Anna Long; Claude Setodji; Scot Hickey; Lillian Gelberg
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 5.043

3.  Implications of the growing use of wireless telephones for health care opinion polls.

Authors:  Joel C Cantor; Susan Brownlee; Cliff Zukin; John M Boyle
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2009-07-27       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  Unrealistic optimism about susceptibility to health problems: conclusions from a community-wide sample.

Authors:  N D Weinstein
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  1987-10

5.  A national survey of stress reactions after the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks.

Authors:  M A Schuster; B D Stein; L Jaycox; R L Collins; G N Marshall; M N Elliott; A J Zhou; D E Kanouse; J L Morrison; S H Berry
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2001-11-15       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  What risks are Chinese people concerned about?

Authors:  Xiaofei Xie; Mei Wang; Liancang Xu
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 4.000

7.  Nationwide longitudinal study of psychological responses to September 11.

Authors:  Roxane Cohen Silver; E Alison Holman; Daniel N McIntosh; Michael Poulin; Virginia Gil-Rivas
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2002-09-11       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Psychological reactions to terrorist attacks: findings from the National Study of Americans' Reactions to September 11.

Authors:  William E Schlenger; Juesta M Caddell; Lori Ebert; B Kathleen Jordan; Kathryn M Rourke; David Wilson; Lisa Thalji; J Michael Dennis; John A Fairbank; Richard A Kulka
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2002-08-07       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Risk perception in a developing country: the case of Chile.

Authors:  Nicolás C Bronfman; Luis A Cifuentes
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 4.000

10.  Concern about environmental pollution: how much difference do race and ethnicity make? A New Jersey case study.

Authors:  Michael R Greenberg
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 9.031

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.