Literature DB >> 12215130

Nationwide longitudinal study of psychological responses to September 11.

Roxane Cohen Silver1, E Alison Holman, Daniel N McIntosh, Michael Poulin, Virginia Gil-Rivas.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: The September 11, 2001, attacks against the United States provide a unique opportunity to examine longitudinally the process of adjustment to a traumatic event on a national scale.
OBJECTIVE: To examine the degree to which demographic factors, mental and physical health history, lifetime exposure to stressful events, September 11-related experiences, and coping strategies used shortly after the attacks predict psychological outcomes over time. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A national probability sample of 3496 adults received a Web-based survey; 2729 individuals (78% participation rate) completed it between 9 and 23 days (75% within 9 to 14 days) after the terrorist attacks. A random sample of 1069 panelists residing outside New York, NY, were drawn from the wave 1 sample (n = 2729) and received a second survey; 933 (87% participation rate) completed it approximately 2 months following the attacks. A third survey (n = 787) was completed approximately 6 months after the attacks. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: September 11-related symptoms of acute stress, posttraumatic stress, and global distress.
RESULTS: Seventeen percent of the US population outside of New York City reported symptoms of September 11-related posttraumatic stress 2 months after the attacks; 5.8% did so at 6 months. High levels of posttraumatic stress symptoms were associated with female sex (odds ratio [OR], 1.64; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.17-2.31), marital separation (OR, 2.55; 95% CI, 1.06-6.14), pre-September 11 physician-diagnosed depression or anxiety disorder (OR, 1.84; 95% CI, 1.33-2.56) or physical illness (OR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.88-0.99), severity of exposure to the attacks (OR, 1.31; 95% CI, 1.11-1.55), and early disengagement from coping efforts (eg, giving up: OR, 1.68; 95% CI, 1.27-2.20; denial: OR, 1.33; 95% CI, 1.07-1.64; and self-distraction: OR, 1.31; 95% CI, 1.07-1.59). In addition to demographic and pre-September 11 health variables, global distress was associated with severity of loss due to the attacks (beta =.07; P =.008) and early coping strategies (eg, increased with denial: beta =.08; P =.005; and giving up: beta =.05; P =.04; and decreased with active coping: beta = -.08; P =.002).
CONCLUSIONS: The psychological effects of a major national trauma are not limited to those who experience it directly, and the degree of response is not predicted simply by objective measures of exposure to or loss from the trauma. Instead, use of specific coping strategies shortly after an event is associated with symptoms over time. In particular, disengaging from coping efforts can signal the likelihood of psychological difficulties up to 6 months after a trauma.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12215130     DOI: 10.1001/jama.288.10.1235

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  170 in total

1.  Terror, Resource Gains and Exclusionist Political Attitudes among New Immigrants and Veteran Israelis.

Authors:  Eran Halperin; Daphna Canetti; Stevan E Hobfoll; Robert J Johnson
Journal:  J Ethn Migr Stud       Date:  2009-07

2.  A New Stress-Based Model of Political Extremism: Personal Exposure to Terrorism, Psychological Distress, and Exclusionist Political Attitudes.

Authors:  Daphna Canetti-Nisim; Eran Halperin; Keren Sharvit; Stevan E Hobfoll
Journal:  J Conflict Resolut       Date:  2009-06

3.  Contextualizing trauma: using evidence-based treatments in a multicultural community after 9/11.

Authors:  Randall D Marshall; Eun Jung Suh
Journal:  Psychiatr Q       Date:  2003

4.  Fear of terrorism in New York after the September 11 terrorist attacks: implications for emergency mental health and preparedness.

Authors:  Joseph A Boscarino; Charles R Figley; Richard E Adams
Journal:  Int J Emerg Ment Health       Date:  2003

Review 5.  Emotional and behavioral consequences of bioterrorism: planning a public health response.

Authors:  Bradley D Stein; Terri L Tanielian; David P Eisenman; Donna J Keyser; M Audrey Burnam; Harold A Pincus
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 4.911

6.  Adolescents react to the events of September 11, 2001: focused versus ambient impact.

Authors:  Carol K Whalen; Barbara Henker; Pamela S King; Larry D Jamner; Linda Levine
Journal:  J Abnorm Child Psychol       Date:  2004-02

7.  Terror attacks influence driving behavior in Israel.

Authors:  Guy Stecklov; Joshua R Goldstein
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-09-24       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Population-level response shift: novel implications for research.

Authors:  Darren Lau; Calypse Agborsangaya; Fatima Al Sayah; Xiuyun Wu; Arto Ohinmaa; Jeffrey A Johnson
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2011-11-18       Impact factor: 4.147

9.  Media's role in broadcasting acute stress following the Boston Marathon bombings.

Authors:  E Alison Holman; Dana Rose Garfin; Roxane Cohen Silver
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-12-09       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 10.  Psychobiology of PTSD in the acute aftermath of trauma: Integrating research on coping, HPA function and sympathetic nervous system activity.

Authors:  Matthew C Morris; Uma Rao
Journal:  Asian J Psychiatr       Date:  2012-09-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.