Literature DB >> 22397338

The expert and the lay public: reflections on influenza A (H1N1) and the risk society.

Charles Dupras1, Bryn Williams-Jones.   

Abstract

Trust between the lay public and scientific experts is a key element to ensuring the efficient implementation of emergency public health measures. In modern risk societies, the management and elimination of risk have become preeminent drivers of public policy. In this context, the protection of public trust is a complex task. Those actors involved in public health decision-making and implementation (e.g., mass vaccination for influenza A virus) are confronted with growing pressures and responsibility to act. However, they also need to accept the limits of their own expertise and recognize the ability of lay publics to understand and be responsible for public health. Such a shared responsibility for risk management, if grounded in participative public debates, can arguably strengthen public trust in public health authorities and interventions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22397338      PMCID: PMC3489361          DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2011.300417

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Public Health        ISSN: 0090-0036            Impact factor:   9.308


  6 in total

1.  Conflicts of interest. WHO and the pandemic flu "conspiracies".

Authors:  Deborah Cohen; Philip Carter
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2010-06-03

2.  Public health response to influenza A(H1N1) as an opportunity to build public trust.

Authors:  Heidi J Larson; David L Heymann
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2010-01-20       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Calibrated response to emerging infections.

Authors:  Peter Doshi
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2009-09-03

4.  Beyond a pejorative understanding of conflict of interest.

Authors:  Bryn Williams-Jones
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 11.229

5.  [Influenza A (H1N1) 2009 and uncertainties: lessons from a pandemic].

Authors:  Anne Iten; Laurent Kaiser
Journal:  Rev Med Suisse       Date:  2010-04-07

6.  Scientific research and the public trust.

Authors:  David B Resnik
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2010-08-29       Impact factor: 3.525

  6 in total
  6 in total

1.  Pandemicity and severity are separate constructs.

Authors:  Alan J Card
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2012-05-17       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Lay people's interpretation of ethical values related to mass vaccination; the case of A(H1N1) vaccination campaign in the province of Quebec (French Canada).

Authors:  Raymond Massé; Michel Désy
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2012-09-28       Impact factor: 3.377

3.  Trust in COVID-19 policy among public health professionals in Israel during the first wave of the pandemic: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Tamar Zohar; Maya Negev; Maia Sirkin; Hagai Levine
Journal:  Isr J Health Policy Res       Date:  2022-04-11

4.  Trust in experts, not trust in national leadership, leads to greater uptake of recommended actions during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Sangeeta C Ahluwalia; Maria O Edelen; Nabeel Qureshi; Jason M Etchegaray
Journal:  Risk Hazards Crisis Public Policy       Date:  2021-04-27

5.  Longitudinal investigation of public trust in institutions relative to the 2009 H1N1 pandemic in Switzerland.

Authors:  Adrian Bangerter; Franciska Krings; Audrey Mouton; Ingrid Gilles; Eva G T Green; Alain Clémence
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-21       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Cultural epidemiology of pandemic influenza in urban and rural Pune, India: a cross-sectional, mixed-methods study.

Authors:  Neisha Sundaram; Christian Schaetti; Vidula Purohit; Abhay Kudale; Mitchell G Weiss
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2014-12-08       Impact factor: 2.692

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.