Literature DB >> 22397307

Cost of clinical management of acromegaly in Spain.

Montse Roset1, Sandra Merino-Montero, Manuel Luque-Ramírez, Susan M Webb, Pedro López-Mondéjar, Isabel Salinas, Alfonso Soto, Carmen Bernal, Carlos Villabona, Daniel De Luis, Sergio Donnay, Herminia Pascual, Jesús Pérez-Luis.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND
BACKGROUND: The cost of the therapeutic management of acromegaly depends on the selection of resources used, surgery and/or pharmacological treatment, by the specialist responsible for treatment, related to the characteristics of the patient and tumour. The objective of this work is to evaluate these costs for an illness that is rare but that is associated with a high morbidity in the context of routine clinical practice.
METHODS: This was an epidemiological, prospective, naturalistic, multicentre study in Spain, in which 38 endocrinologists participated. Adult patients with acromegaly and a pituitary microadenoma or macroadenoma were included in the study. Patients were assigned, according to first-line treatment, to the following two groups: surgery first-line group (surgery in the 6 months before inclusion or during the follow-up period) and pharmaceutical first-line group (treatment with somatostatin analogues [SAs] for at least 6 months and with or without surgery after starting treatment with SAs). Data were collected during routine visits made during a follow-up period of 2 years. All resources were estimated at 2009 prices (€) and adjusted according to the Spanish consumer price index in 2010.
RESULTS: Seventy-four patients were included, the majority of them with macroadenoma (70%). Eighty-eight percent of patients were treated surgically (76% as a first-line treatment), while 12% of patients received only SAs. Treatment with SAs was used at some point in the study by 85% of patients. The mean annual total cost of acromegaly is €9668 per patient (€9223 for the surgery group and €11,054 for the pharmaceutical group). Seventy-one percent of the direct cost of the disease corresponds to treatment with SAs. The cost of a patient treated only with surgery is €2501 on an annual basis, versus €9745 for a patient receiving only pharmacological treatment. In cases where a combination of both types of treatment is required, the annual total cost ranges from €10,866 to €12,364.
CONCLUSION: The annual direct cost per patients of acromegaly in Spain is €9668. Even though surgery is the preferred option for treatment for a great number of patients, SAs must be added to the treatment regimen of the majority of such patients. The costs associated with this treatment are greater than the cost of treatment with SAs alone.
© 2012 Adis Data Information BV. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22397307     DOI: 10.2165/11599680-000000000-00000

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Drug Investig        ISSN: 1173-2563            Impact factor:   2.859


  20 in total

Review 1.  Acromegaly. Diagnosis and therapy.

Authors:  A L Barkan
Journal:  Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 4.741

2.  Epidemiology and long-term survival in acromegaly. A study of 166 cases diagnosed between 1955 and 1984.

Authors:  B A Bengtsson; S Edén; I Ernest; A Odén; B Sjögren
Journal:  Acta Med Scand       Date:  1988

Review 3.  The cost of medical care for the acromegalic patient.

Authors:  Robert Knutzen; Shereen Ezzat
Journal:  Neuroendocrinology       Date:  2006-10-13       Impact factor: 4.914

4.  Cost-of-illness study in acromegalic patients in Italy.

Authors:  G Didoni; S Grottol; V Gasco; M Battistini; D Ferone; M Giusti; F Ragazzoni; P Ruffo; E Ghigo; F Minuto
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 4.256

Review 5.  Guidelines for acromegaly management: an update.

Authors:  S Melmed; A Colao; A Barkan; M Molitch; A B Grossman; D Kleinberg; D Clemmons; P Chanson; E Laws; J Schlechte; M L Vance; K Ho; A Giustina
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2009-02-10       Impact factor: 5.958

6.  Mortality in acromegaly: a metaanalysis.

Authors:  O M Dekkers; N R Biermasz; A M Pereira; J A Romijn; J P Vandenbroucke
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2007-10-30       Impact factor: 5.958

7.  Cost of management of invasive growth hormone-secreting macroadenoma.

Authors:  M Luque-Ramírez; C Paramo; C Varela da Costa; R V García-Mayor
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2007 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.256

Review 8.  Clinical, quality of life, and economic value of acromegaly disease control.

Authors:  A Ben-Shlomo; M C Sheppard; J M Stephens; S Pulgar; S Melmed
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 4.107

9.  Ascertainment and natural history of treated acromegaly in Northern Ireland.

Authors:  C M Ritchie; A B Atkinson; A L Kennedy; A R Lyons; D S Gordon; T Fannin; D R Hadden
Journal:  Ulster Med J       Date:  1990-04

10.  Clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of pegvisomant for the treatment of acromegaly: a systematic review and economic evaluation.

Authors:  David J Moore; Yaser Adi; Martin J Connock; Sue Bayliss
Journal:  BMC Endocr Disord       Date:  2009-10-08       Impact factor: 2.763

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Expert consensus document: A consensus on the medical treatment of acromegaly.

Authors:  Andrea Giustina; Philippe Chanson; David Kleinberg; Marcello D Bronstein; David R Clemmons; Anne Klibanski; Aart J van der Lely; Christian J Strasburger; Steven W Lamberts; Ken K Y Ho; Felipe F Casanueva; Shlomo Melmed
Journal:  Nat Rev Endocrinol       Date:  2014-02-25       Impact factor: 43.330

2.  Impact of pre-treatment with somatostatin analogs on surgical management of acromegalic patients referred to a single center.

Authors:  Susanna Bacigaluppi; Federico Gatto; Pasquale Anania; Nicola Luigi Bragazzi; Diego Criminelli Rossi; Giulia Benvegnu; Elena Nazzari; Renato Spaziante; Massimo Giusti; Diego Ferone; Gianluigi Zona
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2015-05-17       Impact factor: 3.633

3.  Diagnosis and management of acromegaly: the patient's perspective.

Authors:  Ilonka Kreitschmann-Andermahr; Sonja Siegel; Bernadette Kleist; Johannes Kohlmann; Daniel Starz; Rolf Buslei; Maria Koltowska-Häggström; Christian J Strasburger; Michael Buchfelder
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 4.107

4.  Somatostatin and CXCR4 chemokine receptor expression in hepatocellular and cholangiocellular carcinomas: tumor capillaries as promising targets.

Authors:  Daniel Kaemmerer; Robin Schindler; Franziska Mußbach; Uta Dahmen; Annelore Altendorf-Hofmann; Olaf Dirsch; Jörg Sänger; Stefan Schulz; Amelie Lupp
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2017-12-28       Impact factor: 4.430

5.  Burden of diabetes mellitus in patients with acromegaly treated with second-line pharmacotherapy in Spain.

Authors:  Laura Sánchez-Cenizo; Javier Aller; José Manuel Martínez-Sesmero; Nuria Mir; Carmen Peral; Darío Rubio-Rodríguez; Carlos Rubio-Terrés
Journal:  Clinicoecon Outcomes Res       Date:  2019-07-22

6.  Patient Characteristics, Diagnostic Delays, Treatment Patterns, Treatment Outcomes, Comorbidities, and Treatment Costs of Acromegaly in China: A Nationwide Study.

Authors:  Xiaopeng Guo; Kailu Wang; Siyue Yu; Lu Gao; Zihao Wang; Huijuan Zhu; Bing Xing; Shuyang Zhang; Dong Dong
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2020-12-01       Impact factor: 5.555

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.