Literature DB >> 15754735

Cost-of-illness study in acromegalic patients in Italy.

G Didoni1, S Grottol, V Gasco, M Battistini, D Ferone, M Giusti, F Ragazzoni, P Ruffo, E Ghigo, F Minuto.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: acromegalic therapeutic goals are directed at removing the tumor, preventing tumor re-growth and reducing long-term morbidity and mortality. In this scenario, the acromegalic patient needs a variety of health resources (diagnostic tests, surgery, radiotherapy, specialist visits and drugs) for his/her cure, in order to decrease/stop the progression of the disease and to cure the co-morbid diseases. Lack of epidemiological data has suggested performing an Italian retrospective study aiming to assess the health resource consumption that is caused by acromegalic cure and the relative co-morbidities, in order to estimate the amount of the direct costs of acromegalic patients.
METHOD: a retrospective study was performed on a total of 134 patients (142 patients selected, 76 in Genoa and 66 in Turin) for a period of about 7 yr preceding the enrolment date. Only direct costs were evaluated by performing an analysis on the perspective of Italian Healthcare Service (SSN).
RESULTS: the mean total direct costs for acromegaly cure ranged from 7,968.41 to 12,533.02 Euros/yr (p < 0.01; Mann Whitney Test), respectively, for Responders and Non-Responders. The cost driver was drug (SS analogs) for acromegalic cure. The co-morbidity conditions associated to acromegalic Non-Responder patients are clearly higher than those with well-controlled disease.
CONCLUSION: the study supports the hypothesis that controlled patients drove a saving for SSN in comparison to poor control patients that use more health resources.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15754735     DOI: 10.1007/BF03345306

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest        ISSN: 0391-4097            Impact factor:   4.256


  30 in total

1.  Epidemiology and long-term survival in acromegaly. A study of 166 cases diagnosed between 1955 and 1984.

Authors:  B A Bengtsson; S Edén; I Ernest; A Odén; B Sjögren
Journal:  Acta Med Scand       Date:  1988

2.  Primary medical therapy for acromegaly.

Authors:  P U Freda; S L Wardlaw
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 5.958

Review 3.  Acromegaly.

Authors:  S Melmed
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1990-04-05       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Long-term treatment of acromegaly with pegvisomant, a growth hormone receptor antagonist.

Authors:  A J van der Lely; R K Hutson; P J Trainer; G M Besser; A L Barkan; L Katznelson; A Klibanski; V Herman-Bonert; S Melmed; M L Vance; P U Freda; P M Stewart; K E Friend; D R Clemmons; G Johannsson; S Stavrou; D M Cook; L S Phillips; C J Strasburger; S Hackett; K A Zib; R J Davis; J A Scarlett; M O Thorner
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2001-11-24       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 5.  Current therapy for acromegaly.

Authors:  P M Stewart
Journal:  Trends Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2000 May-Jun       Impact factor: 12.015

Review 6.  Current treatment guidelines for acromegaly.

Authors:  S Melmed; I Jackson; D Kleinberg; A Klibanski
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 5.958

7.  Conventional supervoltage irradiation is an effective treatment for acromegaly.

Authors:  R C Eastman; P Gorden; J Roth
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  1979-06       Impact factor: 5.958

8.  Determinants of clinical outcome and survival in acromegaly.

Authors:  C Rajasoorya; I M Holdaway; P Wrightson; D J Scott; H K Ibbertson
Journal:  Clin Endocrinol (Oxf)       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 3.478

Review 9.  Growth hormone-releasing hormone-producing tumors: clinical, biochemical, and morphological manifestations.

Authors:  T Sano; S L Asa; K Kovacs
Journal:  Endocr Rev       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 19.871

10.  Long-term mortality after transsphenoidal surgery and adjunctive therapy for acromegaly.

Authors:  B Swearingen; F G Barker; L Katznelson; B M Biller; S Grinspoon; A Klibanski; N Moayeri; P M Black; N T Zervas
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 5.958

View more
  15 in total

1.  Pre-surgical treatment with somatostatin analogues in patients with acromegaly: the case for.

Authors:  D Ferone; F Gatto; F Minuto
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 4.256

Review 2.  Cost-of-illness studies : a review of current methods.

Authors:  Ebere Akobundu; Jing Ju; Lisa Blatt; C Daniel Mullins
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 3.  Retrospective economic and outcomes analyses using non-US databases: a review.

Authors:  Lizheng Shi; Eric Q Wu; Meredith Hodges; Andrew Yu; Howard Birnbaum
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 4.981

4.  Cost of clinical management of acromegaly in Spain.

Authors:  Montse Roset; Sandra Merino-Montero; Manuel Luque-Ramírez; Susan M Webb; Pedro López-Mondéjar; Isabel Salinas; Alfonso Soto; Carmen Bernal; Carlos Villabona; Daniel De Luis; Sergio Donnay; Herminia Pascual; Jesús Pérez-Luis
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2012-04-01       Impact factor: 2.859

5.  Evaluation of acromegaly treatment direct costs with respect to biochemical control and follow-up length.

Authors:  Francesco Cocchiara; Claudia Campana; Federica Nista; Giuliana Corica; Marco Ceraudo; Angelo Milioto; Diego Criminelli Rossi; Gianluigi Zona; Diego Ferone; Federico Gatto
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2021-11-10       Impact factor: 4.107

6.  Treatments, complications, and healthcare utilization associated with acromegaly: a study in two large United States databases.

Authors:  M S Broder; M P Neary; E Chang; D Cherepanov; L Katznelson
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 4.107

7.  Cost of management of invasive growth hormone-secreting macroadenoma.

Authors:  M Luque-Ramírez; C Paramo; C Varela da Costa; R V García-Mayor
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2007 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.256

8.  Decision-tree model for health economic comparison of two long-acting somatostatin receptor ligand devices in France, Germany, and the UK.

Authors:  Rémi Marty; Stéphane Roze; Hannah Kurth
Journal:  Med Devices (Auckl)       Date:  2012-05-01

Review 9.  Clinical, quality of life, and economic value of acromegaly disease control.

Authors:  A Ben-Shlomo; M C Sheppard; J M Stephens; S Pulgar; S Melmed
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 4.107

10.  Clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of pegvisomant for the treatment of acromegaly: a systematic review and economic evaluation.

Authors:  David J Moore; Yaser Adi; Martin J Connock; Sue Bayliss
Journal:  BMC Endocr Disord       Date:  2009-10-08       Impact factor: 2.763

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.