Literature DB >> 22396582

Incidence and outcome of surgical procedures after coronary bare-metal and drug-eluting stent implantation: a report from the CREDO-Kyoto PCI/CABG registry cohort-2.

Akihiro Tokushige1, Hiroki Shiomi, Takeshi Morimoto, Yutaka Furukawa, Yoshihisa Nakagawa, Kazushige Kadota, Masashi Iwabuchi, Satoshi Shizuta, Tomohisa Tada, Junichi Tazaki, Yoshihiro Kato, Mamoru Hayano, Mitsuru Abe, Natsuhiko Ehara, Tsukasa Inada, Satoshi Kaburagi, Shuichi Hamasaki, Chuwa Tei, Hitoshi Nakashima, Hisao Ogawa, Ryozo Tatami, Satoru Suwa, Akinori Takizawa, Ryuji Nohara, Hisayoshi Fujiwara, Kazuaki Mitsudo, Masakiyo Nobuyoshi, Toru Kita, Takeshi Kimura.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There still remain safety concerns on surgical procedures after coronary drug-eluting stents (DES) implantation, and optimal management of perioperative antiplatelet therapy (APT) has not been yet established. METHODS AND
RESULTS: During 3-year follow-up of 12 207 patients (DES=6802 patients and bare-metal stent [BMS] only=5405 patients) who underwent coronary stent implantation in the CREDO-Kyoto registry cohort-2, surgical procedures were performed in 2398 patients (DES=1295 patients and BMS=1103 patients). Surgical procedures (early surgery in particular) were more frequently performed in the BMS group than in the DES group (4.4% versus 1.9% at 42-day and 23% versus 21% at 3-year, log-rank P=0.0007). Cumulative incidences of death/myocardial infarction (MI)/stent thrombosis (ST) and bleeding at 30 days after surgery were low, without differences between BMS and DES (3.5% versus 2.9%, P=0.4 and 3.2% versus 2.1%, P=0.2, respectively). The adjusted risks of DES use relative to BMS use for death/MI/ST and bleeding were not significant (hazard ratio: 1.63, 95% confidence interval: 0.93 to 2.87, P=0.09 and hazard ratio: 0.6, 95% confidence interval: 0.34 to 1.06, P=0.08, respectively). The risks of perioperative single- and no-APT relative to dual-APT for both death/MI/ST and bleeding were not significant; single-APT as compared with dual-APT tended to be associated with lower risk for death/MI/ST (hazard ratio: 0.4, 95% confidence interval: 0.13 to 1.01, P=0.053).
CONCLUSIONS: Surgical procedures were commonly performed after coronary stent implantation, and the risk of ischemic and bleeding complications in surgical procedures was low. In patients selected to receive DES or BMS, there were no differences in outcomes. Perioperative administration of dual-APT was not associated with lower risk for ischemic events.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22396582     DOI: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.111.963728

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Interv        ISSN: 1941-7640            Impact factor:   6.546


  8 in total

Review 1.  Non-cardiac surgery in patients with coronary artery disease: risk evaluation and periprocedural management.

Authors:  Davide Cao; Rishi Chandiramani; Davide Capodanno; Jeffrey S Berger; Matthew A Levin; Mary T Hawn; Dominick J Angiolillo; Roxana Mehran
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2020-08-05       Impact factor: 32.419

2.  Non-cardiac surgery following drug-eluting coronary stent implantation-a question of timing?

Authors:  Andrew J Mitchell; Michael A Gillies; Nicholas L Cruden
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 3.  Recommendations for perioperative management of lung cancer patients with comorbidities.

Authors:  Hiroyoshi Tsubochi; Tomoki Shibano; Shunsuke Endo
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2017-11-16

4.  A case of myocardial infarction caused by obstruction of a drug-eluting stent during the perioperative period.

Authors:  Hiroaki Toyama; Kazutomo Saito; Hiroyuki Anzai; Naoya Kobayashi; Takanori Aihara; Yutaka Ejima; Masanori Yamauchi
Journal:  JA Clin Rep       Date:  2015-12-29

Review 5.  Cardiac Evaluation and Monitoring of Patients Undergoing Noncardiac Surgery.

Authors:  Arsalan Rafiq; Eduard Sklyar; Jonathan N Bella
Journal:  Health Serv Insights       Date:  2017-02-20

6.  Clinical Outcome of Noncardiac Surgery in Patients With History of Coronary Artery Revascularization by Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Versus Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery.

Authors:  Jungchan Park; Seung Hwa Lee; Jeayoun Kim; Myungsoo Park; Hyeon-Cheol Gwon; Young Tak Lee; Sangmin Maria Lee
Journal:  Jpn Clin Med       Date:  2018-01-03

7.  Update of the Brazilian Society of Cardiology's Perioperative Cardiovascular Assessment Guideline: Focus on Managing Patients with Percutaneous Coronary Intervention - 2022.

Authors:  Daniela Calderaro; Luciana Dornfeld Bichuette; Pamela Camara Maciel; Francisco Akira Malta Cardozo; Henrique Barbosa Ribeiro; Danielle Menosi Gualandro; Luciano Moreira Baracioli; Alexandre de Matos Soeiro; Carlos Vicente Serrano; Ricardo Alves da Costa; Bruno Caramelli
Journal:  Arq Bras Cardiol       Date:  2022-02       Impact factor: 2.000

8.  Gastroscopy-related adverse cardiac events and bleeding complications among patients treated with coronary stents and dual antiplatelet therapy.

Authors:  Gro Egholm; Troels Thim; Morten Madsen; Henrik Toft Sørensen; Jan Bech Pedersen; Svend Eggert Jensen; Lisette Okkels Jensen; Steen Dalby Kristensen; Hans Erik Bøtker; Michael Maeng
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2016-04-28
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.