Literature DB >> 15632378

CYP2D6 genotype, antidepressant use, and tamoxifen metabolism during adjuvant breast cancer treatment.

Yan Jin1, Zeruesenay Desta, Vered Stearns, Bryan Ward, Herbert Ho, Kyung-Hoon Lee, Todd Skaar, Anna Maria Storniolo, Lang Li, Adjei Araba, Rebecca Blanchard, Anne Nguyen, Lynda Ullmer, Jill Hayden, Suzanne Lemler, Richard M Weinshilboum, James M Rae, Daniel F Hayes, David A Flockhart.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of tamoxifen therapy for the treatment of breast cancer varies widely among individuals. Plasma concentrations of the active tamoxifen metabolite endoxifen are associated with the cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2D6 genotype. We examined the effects of concomitant use of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor antidepressants, which are CYP2D6 enzyme inhibitors commonly prescribed to treat hot flashes in women who take tamoxifen, and genotypes for genes that encode tamoxifen-metabolizing enzymes on plasma concentrations of tamoxifen and its metabolites.
METHODS: Eighty patients with newly diagnosed with breast cancer who were beginning tamoxifen therapy (20 mg/day orally), 24 of whom were taking CYP2D6 inhibitors, were genotyped for common alleles of the CYP2D6, CYP2C9, CYP3A5, and sulfotransferase (SULT) 1A1 genes. Plasma concentrations of tamoxifen and its metabolites were measured after 1 and 4 months of tamoxifen therapy. Differences in plasma concentrations of tamoxifen and its metabolites between genotype groups were analyzed by the Wilcoxon rank sum test. All statistical tests were two-sided.
RESULTS: Among all women, plasma endoxifen concentrations after 4 months of tamoxifen therapy were statistically significantly lower in subjects with a CYP2D6 homozygous variant genotype (20.0 nM, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 11.1 to 28.9 nM) or a heterozygous genotype (43.1 nM, 95% CI = 33.3 to 52.9 nM) than in those with a homozygous wild-type genotype (78.0 nM, 95%CI = 65.9 to 90.1 nM) (both P = .003). Among subjects who carried a homozygous wild-type genotype, the mean plasma endoxifen concentration for those who were using CYP2D6 inhibitors was 58% lower than that for those who were not (38.6 nM versus 91.4 nM, difference = -52.8 nM, 95% CI = -86.1 to -19.5 nM, P = .0025). The plasma endoxifen concentration was slightly reduced in women taking venlafaxine, a weak inhibitor of CYP2D6, whereas the plasma endoxifen concentration was reduced substantially in subjects who took paroxetine (a potent inhibitor of CYP2D6). Genetic variations of CYP2C9, CYP3A5, or SULT1A1 had no statistically significant associations with plasma concentrations of tamoxifen or its metabolites.
CONCLUSION: Interactions between CYP2D6 polymorphisms and coadministered antidepressants and other drugs that are CYP2D6 inhibitors may be associated with altered tamoxifen activity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15632378     DOI: 10.1093/jnci/dji005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst        ISSN: 0027-8874            Impact factor:   13.506


  246 in total

1.  Pharmacogenomic diversity of tamoxifen metabolites and estrogen receptor genes in Hispanics and non-Hispanic whites with breast cancer.

Authors:  Leticia B A Rangel; Jodi L Taraba; Christopher R Frei; Lon Smith; Gladys Rodriguez; John G Kuhn
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2014-11-14       Impact factor: 4.872

Review 2.  Part 2: pharmacogenetic variability in drug transport and phase I anticancer drug metabolism.

Authors:  Maarten J Deenen; Annemieke Cats; Jos H Beijnen; Jan H M Schellens
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2011-05-31

Review 3.  Clinically significant drug interactions with newer antidepressants.

Authors:  Edoardo Spina; Gianluca Trifirò; Filippo Caraci
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2012-01-01       Impact factor: 5.749

4.  SULT1A1, CYP2C19 and disease-free survival in early breast cancer patients receiving tamoxifen.

Authors:  Ann M Moyer; Vera J Suman; Richard M Weinshilboum; Rajeswari Avula; John L Black; Stephanie L Safgren; Mary J Kuffel; Matthew M Ames; James N Ingle; Matthew P Goetz
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics       Date:  2011-10-03       Impact factor: 2.533

5.  Gene-expression profiling in breast cancer: bespoke cancer therapy or more fiction than science?

Authors:  M Barry; M R Kell
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2010-08-31       Impact factor: 1.568

Review 6.  Metabolism and transport of tamoxifen in relation to its effectiveness: new perspectives on an ongoing controversy.

Authors:  Deirdre P Cronin-Fenton; Per Damkier; Timothy L Lash
Journal:  Future Oncol       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 3.404

Review 7.  New insights into the metabolism of tamoxifen and its role in the treatment and prevention of breast cancer.

Authors:  V Craig Jordan
Journal:  Steroids       Date:  2007-07-27       Impact factor: 2.668

Review 8.  Pharmacogenomic progress in individualized dosing of key drugs for cancer patients.

Authors:  Christine M Walko; Howard McLeod
Journal:  Nat Clin Pract Oncol       Date:  2009-01-27

9.  Estrogen receptor genotypes, menopausal status, and the lipid effects of tamoxifen.

Authors:  N I Ntukidem; A T Nguyen; V Stearns; M Rehman; A Schott; T Skaar; Y Jin; P Blanche; L Li; S Lemler; J Hayden; R M Krauss; Z Desta; D A Flockhart; D F Hayes
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2007-08-22       Impact factor: 6.875

Review 10.  Mechanisms, Predictors, and Challenges in Assessing and Managing Painful Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy.

Authors:  Grace A Kanzawa-Lee; Robert Knoerl; Clare Donohoe; Celia M Bridges; Ellen M Lavoie Smith
Journal:  Semin Oncol Nurs       Date:  2019-04-30       Impact factor: 2.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.