Literature DB >> 22394487

Cortical aPKC kinase activity distinguishes neural stem cells from progenitor cells by ensuring asymmetric segregation of Numb.

Jill M Haenfler1, Chaoyuan Kuang, Cheng-Yu Lee.   

Abstract

During asymmetric stem cell division, polarization of the cell cortex targets fate determinants unequally into the sibling daughters, leading to regeneration of a stem cell and production of a progenitor cell with restricted developmental potential. In mitotic neural stem cells (neuroblasts) in fly larval brains, the antagonistic interaction between the polarity proteins Lethal (2) giant larvae (Lgl) and atypical Protein Kinase C (aPKC) ensures self-renewal of a daughter neuroblast and generation of a progenitor cell by regulating asymmetric segregation of fate determinants. In the absence of lgl function, elevated cortical aPKC kinase activity perturbs unequal partitioning of the fate determinants including Numb and induces supernumerary neuroblasts in larval brains. However, whether increased aPKC function triggers formation of excess neuroblasts by inactivating Numb remains controversial. To investigate how increased cortical aPKC function induces formation of excess neuroblasts, we analyzed the fate of cells in neuroblast lineage clones in lgl mutant brains. Surprisingly, our analyses revealed that neuroblasts in lgl mutant brains undergo asymmetric division to produce progenitor cells, which then revert back into neuroblasts. In lgl mutant brains, Numb remained localized in the cortex of mitotic neuroblasts and failed to segregate exclusively into the progenitor cell following completion of asymmetric division. These results led us to propose that elevated aPKC function in the cortex of mitotic neuroblasts reduces the function of Numb in the future progenitor cells. We identified that the acyl-CoA binding domain containing 3 protein (ACBD3) binding region is essential for asymmetric segregation of Numb in mitotic neuroblasts and suppression of the supernumerary neuroblast phenotype induced by increased aPKC function. The ACBD3 binding region of Numb harbors two aPKC phosphorylation sites, serines 48 and 52. Surprisingly, while the phosphorylation status at these two sites directly impinged on asymmetric segregation of Numb in mitotic neuroblasts, both the phosphomimetic and non-phosphorylatable forms of Numb suppressed formation of excess neuroblasts triggered by increased cortical aPKC function. Thus, we propose that precise regulation of cortical aPKC kinase activity distinguishes the sibling cell identity in part by ensuring asymmetric partitioning of Numb into the future progenitor cell where Numb maintains restricted potential independently of regulation by aPKC.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22394487      PMCID: PMC3322243          DOI: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2012.02.027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dev Biol        ISSN: 0012-1606            Impact factor:   3.582


  46 in total

1.  The Drosophila Numb protein inhibits signaling of the Notch receptor during cell-cell interaction in sensory organ lineage.

Authors:  E Frise; J A Knoblich; S Younger-Shepherd; L Y Jan; Y N Jan
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1996-10-15       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Changes in Notch signaling coordinates maintenance and differentiation of the Drosophila larval optic lobe neuroepithelia.

Authors:  Mo Weng; Jill M Haenfler; Cheng-Yu Lee
Journal:  Dev Neurobiol       Date:  2012-07-27       Impact factor: 3.964

3.  Asymmetric segregation of the homeodomain protein Prospero during Drosophila development.

Authors:  J Hirata; H Nakagoshi; Y Nabeshima; F Matsuzaki
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1995-10-19       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  The bHLH factor deadpan is a direct target of Notch signaling and regulates neuroblast self-renewal in Drosophila.

Authors:  Beatriz P San-Juán; Antonio Baonza
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  2011-01-22       Impact factor: 3.582

5.  Regulation of cell growth by Notch signaling and its differential requirement in normal vs. tumor-forming stem cells in Drosophila.

Authors:  Yan Song; Bingwei Lu
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2011-12-15       Impact factor: 11.361

6.  The tumour-suppressor genes lgl and dlg regulate basal protein targeting in Drosophila neuroblasts.

Authors:  C Y Peng; L Manning; R Albertson; C Q Doe
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-11-30       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Control of daughter cell fates during asymmetric division: interaction of Numb and Notch.

Authors:  M Guo; L Y Jan; Y N Jan
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 17.173

8.  Miranda is required for the asymmetric localization of Prospero during mitosis in Drosophila.

Authors:  C P Shen; L Y Jan; Y N Jan
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1997-08-08       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 9.  Asymmetric cell division: recent developments and their implications for tumour biology.

Authors:  Juergen A Knoblich
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 94.444

10.  Differential expression of mammalian Numb, Numblike and Notch1 suggests distinct roles during mouse cortical neurogenesis.

Authors:  W Zhong; M M Jiang; G Weinmaster; L Y Jan; Y N Jan
Journal:  Development       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 6.868

View more
  21 in total

1.  An Hdac1/Rpd3-Poised Circuit Balances Continual Self-Renewal and Rapid Restriction of Developmental Potential during Asymmetric Stem Cell Division.

Authors:  Derek H Janssens; Danielle C Hamm; Lucas Anhezini; Qi Xiao; Karsten H Siller; Sarah E Siegrist; Melissa M Harrison; Cheng-Yu Lee
Journal:  Dev Cell       Date:  2017-02-27       Impact factor: 12.270

Review 2.  It takes two to tango, a dance between the cells of origin and cancer stem cells in the Drosophila larval brain.

Authors:  Derek H Janssens; Cheng-Yu Lee
Journal:  Semin Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2014-03-11       Impact factor: 7.727

3.  Regulation of Notch signaling and endocytosis by the Lgl neoplastic tumor suppressor.

Authors:  Marta Portela; Linda M Parsons; Nicola A Grzeschik; Helena E Richardson
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 4.534

4.  Phosphorylation of the Polarity Protein BASL Differentiates Asymmetric Cell Fate through MAPKs and SPCH.

Authors:  Ying Zhang; Xiaoyu Guo; Juan Dong
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2016-10-13       Impact factor: 10.834

5.  Compromising asymmetric stem cell division in Drosophila central brain: Revisiting the connections with tumorigenesis.

Authors:  Ana Carmena
Journal:  Fly (Austin)       Date:  2018-01-08       Impact factor: 2.160

6.  Homeodomain protein Six4 prevents the generation of supernumerary Drosophila type II neuroblasts and premature differentiation of intermediate neural progenitors.

Authors:  Rui Chen; Yanjun Hou; Marisa Connell; Sijun Zhu
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2021-02-08       Impact factor: 5.917

7.  Earmuff restricts progenitor cell potential by attenuating the competence to respond to self-renewal factors.

Authors:  Derek H Janssens; Hideyuki Komori; Daniel Grbac; Keng Chen; Chwee Tat Koe; Hongyan Wang; Cheng-Yu Lee
Journal:  Development       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 6.868

8.  The cell polarity scaffold Lethal Giant Larvae regulates synapse morphology and function.

Authors:  Jon Staples; Kendal Broadie
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2013-02-26       Impact factor: 5.285

9.  miR-219 regulates neural precursor differentiation by direct inhibition of apical par polarity proteins.

Authors:  Laura I Hudish; Alex J Blasky; Bruce Appel
Journal:  Dev Cell       Date:  2013-11-14       Impact factor: 12.270

10.  klumpfuss distinguishes stem cells from progenitor cells during asymmetric neuroblast division.

Authors:  Qi Xiao; Hideyuki Komori; Cheng-Yu Lee
Journal:  Development       Date:  2012-06-28       Impact factor: 6.868

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.