Literature DB >> 22745313

klumpfuss distinguishes stem cells from progenitor cells during asymmetric neuroblast division.

Qi Xiao1, Hideyuki Komori, Cheng-Yu Lee.   

Abstract

Asymmetric stem cell division balances maintenance of the stem cell pool and generation of diverse cell types by simultaneously allowing one daughter progeny to maintain a stem cell fate and its sibling to acquire a progenitor cell identity. A progenitor cell possesses restricted developmental potential, and defects in the regulation of progenitor cell potential can directly impinge on the maintenance of homeostasis and contribute to tumor initiation. Despite their importance, the molecular mechanisms underlying the precise regulation of restricted developmental potential in progenitor cells remain largely unknown. We used the type II neural stem cell (neuroblast) lineage in Drosophila larval brain as a genetic model system to investigate how an intermediate neural progenitor (INP) cell acquires restricted developmental potential. We identify the transcription factor Klumpfuss (Klu) as distinguishing a type II neuroblast from an INP in larval brains. klu functions to maintain the identity of type II neuroblasts, and klu mutant larval brains show progressive loss of type II neuroblasts due to premature differentiation. Consistently, Klu protein is detected in type II neuroblasts but is undetectable in immature INPs. Misexpression of klu triggers immature INPs to revert to type II neuroblasts. In larval brains lacking brain tumor function or exhibiting constitutively activated Notch signaling, removal of klu function prevents the reversion of immature INPs. These results led us to propose that multiple mechanisms converge to exert precise control of klu and distinguish a progenitor cell from its sibling stem cell during asymmetric neuroblast division.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22745313      PMCID: PMC3392700          DOI: 10.1242/dev.081687

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Development        ISSN: 0950-1991            Impact factor:   6.868


  52 in total

1.  Nicastrin is required for Presenilin-mediated transmembrane cleavage in Drosophila.

Authors:  H M Chung; G Struhl
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 28.824

Review 2.  Mosaic analysis with a repressible cell marker (MARCM) for Drosophila neural development.

Authors:  T Lee; L Luo
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 13.837

3.  Changes in Notch signaling coordinates maintenance and differentiation of the Drosophila larval optic lobe neuroepithelia.

Authors:  Mo Weng; Jill M Haenfler; Cheng-Yu Lee
Journal:  Dev Neurobiol       Date:  2012-07-27       Impact factor: 3.964

4.  Genetic control of programmed cell death in Drosophila.

Authors:  K White; M E Grether; J M Abrams; L Young; K Farrell; H Steller
Journal:  Science       Date:  1994-04-29       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Asymmetric distribution of numb protein during division of the sensory organ precursor cell confers distinct fates to daughter cells.

Authors:  M S Rhyu; L Y Jan; Y N Jan
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1994-02-11       Impact factor: 41.582

6.  Mutations in the beta-propeller domain of the Drosophila brain tumor (brat) protein induce neoplasm in the larval brain.

Authors:  E Arama; D Dickman; Z Kimchie; A Shearn; Z Lev
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2000-08-03       Impact factor: 9.867

7.  Specification of motoneuron fate in Drosophila: integration of positive and negative transcription factor inputs by a minimal eve enhancer.

Authors:  Jocelyn A McDonald; Miki Fujioka; Joanne P Odden; James B Jaynes; Chris Q Doe
Journal:  J Neurobiol       Date:  2003-11

8.  Dlg, Scrib and Lgl regulate neuroblast cell size and mitotic spindle asymmetry.

Authors:  Roger Albertson; Chris Q Doe
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 28.824

9.  The head involution defective gene of Drosophila melanogaster functions in programmed cell death.

Authors:  M E Grether; J M Abrams; J Agapite; K White; H Steller
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  1995-07-15       Impact factor: 11.361

10.  Drosophila aPKC regulates cell polarity and cell proliferation in neuroblasts and epithelia.

Authors:  Melissa M Rolls; Roger Albertson; Hsin-Pei Shih; Cheng-Yu Lee; Chris Q Doe
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2003-12-01       Impact factor: 10.539

View more
  35 in total

1.  An Hdac1/Rpd3-Poised Circuit Balances Continual Self-Renewal and Rapid Restriction of Developmental Potential during Asymmetric Stem Cell Division.

Authors:  Derek H Janssens; Danielle C Hamm; Lucas Anhezini; Qi Xiao; Karsten H Siller; Sarah E Siegrist; Melissa M Harrison; Cheng-Yu Lee
Journal:  Dev Cell       Date:  2017-02-27       Impact factor: 12.270

Review 2.  Opportunities lost and gained: Changes in progenitor competence during nervous system development.

Authors:  Dylan R Farnsworth; Chris Q Doe
Journal:  Neurogenesis (Austin)       Date:  2017-05-26

Review 3.  It takes two to tango, a dance between the cells of origin and cancer stem cells in the Drosophila larval brain.

Authors:  Derek H Janssens; Cheng-Yu Lee
Journal:  Semin Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2014-03-11       Impact factor: 7.727

4.  A cell atlas of the adult Drosophila midgut.

Authors:  Ruei-Jiun Hung; Yanhui Hu; Rory Kirchner; Yifang Liu; Chiwei Xu; Aram Comjean; Sudhir Gopal Tattikota; Fangge Li; Wei Song; Shannan Ho Sui; Norbert Perrimon
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-01-08       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Compromising asymmetric stem cell division in Drosophila central brain: Revisiting the connections with tumorigenesis.

Authors:  Ana Carmena
Journal:  Fly (Austin)       Date:  2018-01-08       Impact factor: 2.160

6.  Brain tumor specifies intermediate progenitor cell identity by attenuating β-catenin/Armadillo activity.

Authors:  Hideyuki Komori; Qi Xiao; Brooke M McCartney; Cheng-Yu Lee
Journal:  Development       Date:  2013-11-20       Impact factor: 6.868

7.  Earmuff restricts progenitor cell potential by attenuating the competence to respond to self-renewal factors.

Authors:  Derek H Janssens; Hideyuki Komori; Daniel Grbac; Keng Chen; Chwee Tat Koe; Hongyan Wang; Cheng-Yu Lee
Journal:  Development       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 6.868

8.  bHLH-O proteins balance the self-renewal and differentiation of Drosophila neural stem cells by regulating Earmuff expression.

Authors:  Xiaosu Li; Rui Chen; Sijun Zhu
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  2017-09-09       Impact factor: 3.582

Review 9.  Understanding how differentiation is maintained: lessons from the Drosophila brain.

Authors:  Francesca Froldi; Louise Y Cheng
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2016-01-27       Impact factor: 9.261

10.  The Ets protein Pointed prevents both premature differentiation and dedifferentiation of Drosophila intermediate neural progenitors.

Authors:  Yonggang Xie; Xiaosu Li; Xiaobing Deng; Yanjun Hou; Krysten O'Hara; Andreacarola Urso; Ying Peng; Li Chen; Sijun Zhu
Journal:  Development       Date:  2016-08-10       Impact factor: 6.868

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.