Song Wen 文颂1, Dong-Fang Liu 柳东芳1, Zhen Liu 刘振2, Steven Harris3, Yu-Yu Yao 姚玉宇4, Qi Ding 丁琪5, Fang Nie 聂芳1, Tong Lu 卢瞳1, Hua-Jun Chen 陈华俊1, Yan-Li An 安艳丽1, Feng-Chao Zang 臧凤超1, Gao-Jun Teng 滕皋军6. 1. Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Molecular and Functional Imaging, Department of Radiology, Zhongda Hospital, Medical School, Southeast University, Nanjing, China. 2. Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Molecular and Functional Imaging, Atherosclerosis Research Center, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China. 3. Department of Biomedical Engineering, Emory University/Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA. 4. Department of Cardiology, Zhongda Hospital, Southeast University, Nanjing, China. 5. Jiangsu Key Laboratory for Biomaterials and Devices, State Key Laboratory of Bioelectronics, School of Biological Science and Medical Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing, China. 6. Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Molecular and Functional Imaging, Department of Radiology, Zhongda Hospital, Medical School, Southeast University, Nanjing, China. Electronic address: gjteng@vip.sina.com.
Abstract
Atherosclerotic disease is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in developed countries, and oxidized LDL (OxLDL) plays a key role in the formation, rupture, and subsequent thrombus formation in atherosclerotic plaques. In the current study, anti-mouse OxLDL polyclonal antibody and nonspecific IgG antibody were conjugated to polyethylene glycol-coated ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide (USPIO) nanoparticles, and a carotid perivascular collar model in apolipoprotein E-deficient mice was imaged at 7.0 Tesla MRI before contrast administration and at 8 h and 24 h after injection of 30 mg Fe/kg. The results showed MRI signal loss in the carotid atherosclerotic lesions after administration of targeted anti-OxLDL-USPIO at 8 h and 24 h, which is consistent with the presence of the nanoparticles in the lesions. Immunohistochemistry confirmed the colocalization of the OxLDL/macrophages and iron oxide nanoparticles. The nonspecific IgG-USPIO, unconjugated USPIO nanoparticles, and competitive inhibition groups had limited signal changes (p < 0.05). This report shows that anti-OxLDL-USPIO nanoparticles can be used to directly detect OxLDL and image atherosclerotic lesions within 24 h of nanoparticle administration and suggests a strategy for the therapeutic evaluation of atherosclerotic plaques in vivo.
Atherosclerotic disease is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in developed countries, and oxidized LDL (OxLDL) plays a key role in the formation, rupture, and subsequent thrombus formation in atherosclerotic plaques. In the current study, anti-mouse OxLDL polyclonal antibody and nonspecific IgG antibody were conjugated to polyethylene glycol-coated ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide (USPIO) nanoparticles, and a carotid perivascular collar model in apolipoprotein E-deficient mice was imaged at 7.0 Tesla MRI before contrast administration and at 8 h and 24 h after injection of 30 mg Fe/kg. The results showed MRI signal loss in the carotid atherosclerotic lesions after administration of targeted anti-OxLDL-USPIO at 8 h and 24 h, which is consistent with the presence of the nanoparticles in the lesions. Immunohistochemistry confirmed the colocalization of the OxLDL/macrophages and iron oxide nanoparticles. The nonspecific IgG-USPIO, unconjugated USPIO nanoparticles, and competitive inhibition groups had limited signal changes (p < 0.05). This report shows that anti-OxLDL-USPIO nanoparticles can be used to directly detect OxLDL and image atherosclerotic lesions within 24 h of nanoparticle administration and suggests a strategy for the therapeutic evaluation of atherosclerotic plaques in vivo.
Despite significant diagnostic and therapeutic advances achieved in the last few decades,
atherosclerotic disease is still a leading factor contributing to morbidity and mortality
worldwide (1). Vulnerable plaques with large lipid
cores, thin fibrous caps, and increased inflammatory cell infiltrate may be more prone to
rupture, exposing the thrombogenic material of the plaque core, precipitating acute
coronary syndrome, and myocardial infarction (2).
It is necessary to develop diagnostic tools that can characterize plaque composition,
especially components that mediate the transition of stable plaques to vulnerable plaques
(3).Oxidized LDL (OxLDL) plays a key role in atherosclerotic plaque formation, rupture, and
thrombotic ischemia in animal models and humans (4). OxLDL stimulates the transformation of macrophages and vascular smooth muscle
cells into lipid-rich foam cells, induces the proliferation and migration of vascular
cells, and retards endothelial regeneration (5).
Recent human studies have shown that vulnerable plaques are enriched in OxLDL and that
increased circulating levels of OxLDL are associated with acute coronary syndrome and
plaque disruption (6). Furthermore, removal of
circulating OxLDL has proven to be a promising strategy for the treatment of
atherosclerosis (7). Therefore, the development of
sensitive molecular imaging probes directly targeting OxLDL in the vessel wall may allow
for in vivo characterization of plaque vulnerability.Briley-Saebo et al. (8–11) have recently demonstrated in vivo imaging of OxLDL by
targeting oxidation-specific epitopes (OSEs), which are abundant in aortic atherosclerotic
lesions of apolipoprotein E-deficient (apoE−/−) mice, using MDA2,
E06, and IK17 Fab. However, these antibodies are only targeted to a single oxLDL epitope
(12, 13). Moreover, the aortic atherosclerotic lesions induced by long periods of
fat-feeding used in these studies were stable and did not lead to plaque rupture (14, 15),
unlike a carotid perivascular collar model in apoE−/− mice in the
presence of hypercholesterolemia that offers reproducible site-controlled neointimal
formation and stenosis, which is more likely to reflect the complex pathogenesis seen in
clinical practice (16, 17).MRI has emerged as a leading noninvasive imaging modality for assessing plaque burden and
evaluating plaque composition with extraordinarily high temporal and spatial resolution
(18, 19). However, MR imaging with endogenous contrast is not sufficient for plaque
characterization (20), and contrast agents are
needed improve the detection and characterization of vulnerable plaques. Ultrasmall
superparamagnetic iron oxide (USPIO) nanoparticles are MRI contrast agents that produce
large local magnetic susceptibilities that lead to signal loss in T2 or T2* weighted
images. These nanoparticles have been extensively studied and applied to imaging
atherosclerosis (8, 21), cancer (22), and
targeted-drug therapy (23), and they can be safe
for human administration (21, 24).In previous investigations, Gao and colleagues (25–28) established a synthetic
route for achieving water-soluble and biocompatible polyethylene glycol (PEG)-coated
Fe3O4 nanocrystals, which were prepared via a
“one-pot” route. MRI studies have demonstrated that these nanoparticles are
useful in tumor detection via passive (25) or
active targeting in vivo (26, 27).In this study, PEG-coated USPIO nanoparticles with polyclonal rabbit anti-copper-oxidemouse LDL antibody were developed to generate a novel, targeted MRI contrast agent. These
nanoparticles were used to detect plaques in an in vivo perivascular collar-induced
atherosclerotic lesion model in carotid arteries of apoE−/− mice.
The results show that the anti-OxLDL-USPIO nanoparticles has excellent diagnostic ability
as an MRI contrast agent, suggesting further potential for characterizing carotid
atherosclerotic lesions.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Materials
PEG-coated USPIO nanoparticles (Fe3O4 nanocrystals, mean size
11.8 ± 0.5 nm, using α,ω-dicarboxyl-terminated PEG [HOOC-PEG-COOH,
Mn = 2000] as the surface capping agent) (25) and synthesized using the “one-pot” reaction were kindly
provided by the Laboratory of Colloid, Interface and Chemical Thermodynamics,
Institute of Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China. Polyclonal
rabbit anti-copper-oxidemouse LDL antibody (IgG, MW 150 KD, >99% pure) was
purchased from Biosynthesis Biotechnogy Co. (Beijing, China).
1-Ethyl-3-(dimethylaminopropyl) carbodiimide hydrochloride (EDC.HCl) and
Sulfo-N-hydrosuccinimide (Sulfo-NHS) were purchased from Medpep Co. (Shanghai,
China).
Synthesis of OxLDL targeted USPIO nanoparticles
To prepare the OxLDL-targeted USPIO nanoparticles, 1 mg of PEG-coated USPIO
nanoparticles was diluted in 200 μl boric acid/borate buffer (pH 9, 0.2 M).
EDC.HCl (1 mg) and Sulfo-NHS (0.5 mg) was then added to the particle solution
(EDC.HCl and Sulfo-NHS dissolve in borate buffer) and mixed well. The reaction
continued for 30 min with continuous mixing. Then 200 μg anti-mouse OxLDL antibody
(dissolved in 100 μl PBS, 0.1 M, pH 7.4) was added, and the mixture was stirred
for 3 h at room temperature. Then, conjugated USPIO nanoparticles were purified three
times with PBS using a centrifugal filter device and stored in PBS (0.1 M, pH 7.4) at
4°C (29). Normal mouse IgG conjugated
USPIO and nonconjugated USPIO nanoparticles were used as controls.
Characterization of conjugated USPIO
The morphology of the USPIO nanoparticles was characterized by transmission electron
microscopy (JEOL-100CX), and particle sizes and size distributions were calculated
using at least 300 particles and image analysis software (Image-Pro Plus 5.0; Media
Cybernetics). The hydrated particle sizes were characterized by dynamic light
scattering (DLS) (90 Plus Particle Size Analyzer; Brookhaven Instruments), and the
magnetic properties of the iron oxide nanoparticles were investigated using a
vibrating sample magnetometer (Lakeshore 7407). The longitudinal (R1) and transverse
(R2) relaxivities at 3.0 Tesla were measured in PBS at 25°C using a clinical MRI
scanner (Philips Achieva 3.0 T; operating frequency 128 MHz). The longitudinal (R1)
and transverse (R2) relaxation rates were determined at five different concentration
levels (0.1–0.5 mmol/l Fe) using a Look Locker T1 mapping sequence (repetition
time/echo time 3.8/1.9 ms, Flip angle 7°) and a Multi-Slice Multi-Echo T2 mapping
sequence (repletion time 2500 ms, echo time 19–112 ms, 16 echoes, Flip angle
180°), respectively. All relaxivity values were calculated as the slope
associated with a linear fit of the iron oxide concentration (mmol/l Fe) versus R1
(mmol/s) or R2 (mmol/s).The specificity of the targeted nanoparticles binding to copper-oxide LDL was
evaluated with a mouse OxLDL ELISA kit (Y-J Biological, Shanghai, China). Antibody
content per USPIO nanoparticleswas estimated using a Braford protein assay kit
(Keygentec, China) combined with the phenanthronline chemical iron quantification
method (26). To assess the stability of the
targeted and untargeted USPIO nanoparticles, the hydrodynamic size of the USPIO
nanoparticles in PBS or 10% FBS was analyzed by DLS measurement within 24 h. The
particles sized were measured for 4 weeks with storage in the dark at 4°C with
ambient humidity.
Radioiodination of conjugated USPIO
Radiolabeling of anti-OxLDL-USPIO nanoparticles with 125I was performed by
the chloramine-T method (30). The iodinated
anti-OxLDL-USPIO nanoparticles were separated from excess reactants by passage
through a Sephadex G-25 column. Anti-OxLDL-USPIO nanoparticles were labeled with
125I to specific activities of 10 μCi μg−1
protein. As control, normal mouse IgG-USPIO nanoparticles were labeled with
125I by a similar method.
Pharmacokinetic and biodistribution of conjugated USPIO nanoparticles
apoE−/− mice (6–8 weeks old) on a C57BL/6 background
receiving a western-type diet (10% grease, 2% cholesterol, and 0.5% cholate;
Cooperative Medical Biological Engineering Co., Nanjing, China) ad libitum beginning
at 8 weeks until 28 to 32 weeks of age were used for all studies. Age-matched C57BL/6
wild-type (WT) mice on normal chow until 28 to 32 weeks of age were used as control
subjects. The biodistribution of 125I-labeled anti-OxLDL-USPIO and
125I-labeled normal mouse IgG-USPIO nanoparticles was examined in
apoE−/− mice and C57BL/6 WT mice (8, 10). Five
apoE−/− mice and five WT mice in one group were
administered 30 μCi of 125I-labeled anti-OxLDL-USPIO via intravenous
tail vein injection, and another group (five apoE−/− mice and
five WT mice) was injected with 30 μCi of 125I-labeled normal mouse
IgG-USPIO nanoparticles. Ten microliters of blood were collected from the tail vein
at 5 min, 30 min, and 1, 2, 4, 8, and 24 h after injection. Blood pool activity was
corrected for decay and normalized by dividing by the initial blood pool counts. The
normalized blood pool data were analyzed by biexponential (two-compartment) curve
fitting. Twenty-four hours after injection, tissues from the liver, lung, heart,
spleen, stomach, colon, kidney, bone, and muscle were collected, and the
radioactivity in each tissue was counted by a γ scintillation counter. The
results are expressed as the percentage of the injected dose per g (%ID/g).
In vitro analysis of USPIO nanoparticle uptake
Murine macrophages (RAW 264.7) were obtained from the Shanghai Cell Bank (Type
Culture Collection Committee, Chinese Academy of Science, China). Cells were cultured
in DMEM media (Gibco, Carlsbad, CA) containing 10% FBS, 1% penicillin-streptomycin,
1% glutamine, and 1% sodium pyruvate in an incubator with 5% CO2 at 100%
humidity and 37°C. Cells between passages 4 and 6 were used in the
experiments.Similar to the studies by Briley-Saebo et al. (8, 10), in vitro cell studies were
performed to determine the extent of passive uptake of PEG-coated targeted and
untargeted USPIO nanoparticles in quiescent and activated foaming macrophages. USPIO
nanoparticles were incubated with cultured macrophages under four conditions:
preincubation of macrophages with or without mouse OxLDL and preincubation of USPIO
nanoparticles with or without mouse OxLDL (8). To perform these experiments, 1 × 106 RAW264.7
macrophages were plated in 12-well plates with DMEM containing 10% FBS. In one set of
wells, mouse OxLDL (100 μg/ml) was added and incubated with macrophages for 12 h
at 37°C, and in the other no OxLDL was added. The macrophages were exposed to
similar conditions. The wells were washed three times with fresh DMEM, and the
macrophages were used in the following experiments. In a similar manner,
anti-OxLDL-USPIO (n = 3), normal mouse IgG-USPIO (n = 3), and
unconjugated USPIO nanoparticles (n = 3) were preexposed or not to mouse OxLDL
(100 μg/ml) for 2 h at 37°C. The USPIO nanoparticles were then incubated with
the macrophages for an additional 12 h at 37°C. Resovist (Ferucarbotran,
Schering, Germany), a commercially available and passively macrophage-targeted SPIO,
was used as a control nanoparticle. Internalized iron oxide particles were detected
with Perl's staining with nuclear fast red counterstaining.
Animal protocol
All experimental animal protocols were approved by the animal care committee of
Southeast University, Nanjing, China. Male apoE−/− mice on a
C57BL/6 background (n = 20), aged 10–12 weeks, were acquired from the
Department of Laboratory Animal Science, Peking University Health Science Center
(Beijing, China). Mice were kept on a 12/12 h light-dark cycle with food and water
freely available. The animals received a western-type diet for 2 weeks before
surgery. All mice underwent surgery after deep anesthesia induced by subcutaneous
injection of 60 mg/kg ketamine (Hengrui Medicine Co., LTD, Jiangsu, China) and 1.26
mg/kg fentanyl citrate (Yichang Humanwell Pharmaceutical Co., LTD, Sichuan, China).
As described by von der Thusen (16), carotid
atherosclerotic lesions were induced using bilateral perivascular polyethylene
collars (PE0503; AniLab Software and Instruments Co., Ningbo, China). Collars
(1.5–2 mm long and 0.25 mm internal diameter) were placed on the common carotid
arteries with an average adventitial diameter of 0.5 mm. The axial edges were
approximated by the placement of two or three circumferential silk ties. All
procedures were performed under a stereomicroscope. The entry wounds were closed, and
the animals were returned to their cages and remained on the western-type diet for 3
weeks. Two mice died after surgery. The 18 remaining apoE−/−
mice were assigned to the following experimental groups: six anti-OxLDL-USPIO
nanoparticles, four untargeted IgG-USPIO nanoparticles, four unconjugated USPIO
nanoparticles, and four for the in vivo competitive inhibition study.
In vivo MRI
In vivo MRI was performed at 7.0 Tesla using a 35-mm birdcage coil and mouse cradle.
Animals were initially anesthetized with a 4% isoflurane/air gas mixture delivered
through a nose cone and maintained under anesthesia with a 1.5–2%
isoflurane/air gas mixture. MRI was performed preceding nanoparticle administration
and at 8 and 24 h after the tail vein injection of 30 mg Fe/kg body weight USPIO
nanoparticles over 1 min. For in vivo competitive inhibition, age-matched
apoE−/− mice (n = 4) received tail vein injection of
a mixture of 1 mg free anti-OxLDL antibody and 30 mg/kg body weight anti-OxLDL-USPIO
nanoparticles. The following MRI sequences were used (1): 3D Fast
Low Angle Shot (FLASH): repetition time/echo time = 15 ms/2.5 ms, Flip angle
= 20°, number of averages = 1; (2) T2-PD (proton
density) weighted dual-echo Multi-Slice Multi-Echo: repetition time = 3,058.5
ms, echo time = 65/13 ms, slice thickness = 0.5 mm, slices = 25,
number of averages = 3, matrix = 256 × 256. The total imaging
time for each time point was less than 40 min.
Image quality and image analysis
Two experienced radiologists independently reviewed each MR study. Image quality was
rated for each artery and contrast weighting on a five-point scale (with 1 being poor
and 5 excellent) based on the overall signal-to-noise ratio of the image and the
clarity of the vessel wall boundary. Slices with image quality less than 2 were
excluded from the study. Preinjection images and MR images taken 8 h and 24 h after
USPIO injection were manually coregistered according to plaque morphology and the
distance from the upper edge of the aortic arch. Changes in the relative signal
intensity (rSI) between the preinjection and the 8 h and 24 h postUSPIO images were
measured within the entire noncalcified portion of athermanous plaque. Image
measurements were made using Paravision 5.0 software by an independent reader who was
blind to the histological analysis. The rSI was defined as the ratio of the signal
intensity (SI) in the user-defined plaque area (SIplaque) to the SI in the
adjacent sternocleidomastoid muscle (SImuscle) for each MR image (24, 31).
The percent of normalized enhancement (%NENH) describes the percent change in the rSI
ratios obtained before and after injection: %NENH = (rSIpost
− rSIpre /rSIpre) × 100%, where rSIpost
is the rSI value obtained after injection and rSIpre is the rSI value
obtained before administration of the USPIO.
Tissue harvest and section
After all MR imaging, the mice were anesthetized by an overdose of intraperitoneally
injected chloral hydrate and perfused with 50–100 ml PBS through the left
ventricle, followed by 4% paraformaldehyde under physiological pressure. The
bilateral common carotid arteries and organs, including the liver, spleen, and
kidneys, were excised and embedded in Tissue-Tek OCT compound (Sakura Finetek Japan
Co., Tokyo), frozen, and sectioned (CM1950; Leica). For the carotid arteries, serial
consecutive cryosections were cut with a 6 μm thickness every 100 μm along the
specimen, and approximately 200 sections were obtained per vessel. For the organs,
serial consecutive cryosections were cut with a 10 μm thickness every 500 μm,
and approximately 10 sections per organ were obtained.
Histomorphometry and immunohistochemistry
Sections obtained from the carotid arteries and organs were stained with hematoxylin
and eosin for morphometric analysis. Perl's staining was applied to identify the
USPIO nanoparticles. Sections were stained with polyclonal anti-OxLDL antibody
(1:100; Biosynthesis Biotechnogy Co., Beijing, China) and anti-CD68 antibody (1:100;
Biolegend, San Diego, CA) for macrophage immunoreactivity using an ultrasensitive SP
immunohistochemical kit (Zhongshan Goldenbridge Biotechnology Co., Beijing, China).
Light hematoxylin counterstaining was used to visualize all nuclei in the tissue
sections. Negative control was added with PBS. All images were reviewed under light
microscope (Scope.A1; Zeiss, Germany) with an independent pathologist.
Computer-assisted morphometry was performed with Image Pro Plus 5.0. A mean of 10
randomly selected fields were counted for each section.
Statistical analysis
Data are indicated as mean ± standard deviation. All multiple comparisons were
made by one-way ANOVA followed by a Tukey post hoc test. All statistical tests were
performed using SPSS for windows (Version 13.0; SPSS), and a value of
P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
RESULTS
Characterization of USPIO nanoparticles
The physical and chemical properties of the nanoparticles are summarized in . The transmission electron
microscopy images () show
that the anti-OxLDL-USPIO nanoparticles are well dispersed in PBS solution. Although
they have the same iron core size, the anti-OxLDL-USPIO and nonspecific IgG-USPIO
nanoparticles have greater hydrated diameters than unconjugated USPIO (28.8 ±
2.32 nm and 27.2 ± 3.99 nm vs. 19.0 ± 2.67 nm) (Fig. 1B, D). The saturation magnetization values of
anti-OxLDL-USPIO and unconjugated USPIO are 53.1 and 52.4 emu/g Fe at 25°C,
respectively (Fig. 1C). The R2 and R1
relaxivity values of anti-OxLDL-USPIO, untargeted IgG-USPIO, and unconjugated USPIO
nanoparticles were 184.82 ± 5.27, 182.65 ± 5.76, and 192.12 ±
5.9 and 4.15 ± 0.11, 4.38 ± 0.02, and 4.26 ± 0.07, respectively.
To assess the stability of the targeted and untargeted USPIO nanoparticles, the
hydrodynamic size of the USPIO nanoparticles in PBS or 10% FBS was analyzed by DLS
measurement. The hydrodynamic sizes did not change significantly within 24 h (Fig. 1D). In addition, the targeted
anti-OxLDL-USPIO and untargeted IgG-USPIO nanoparticles exhibited limited (<10%)
variation in hydrodynamic size after 4 weeks of storage in PBS at 4°C, showing
excellent stability in an aqueous medium. The concentration of antibody per USPIO was
58.12 μg protein/mg Fe, and ELISA showed that the anti-OxLDL-antibody conjugated
with USPIO nanoparticles retained its biological activity, whereas the unconjugated
USPIO and boiled anti-OxLDL-USPIO nanoparticles had a negligible effect on the
OD450 value (Fig. 1E).
TABLE 1.
Physical and chemical properties of nanoparticles
Formulation
Anti-OxLDL-USPIO
Untargeted IgG-USPIO
Unconjugated USPIO
Size (hydrodynamic diameter, nm)
28.2 ± 2.82
27.2 ± 3.99
19.0 ± 2.67
R1 at 128 MHz (s mmol/L)
4.15 ± 0.11
4.38 ± 0.02
4.26 ± 0.07
R2 at 128 MHz (s mmol/L)
184.82 ± 5.27
182.65 ± 5.76
192.12 ± 5.9
R2/R1 value
44.53
41.7
45.1
Blood half-life ApoE−/− (h)
14.13*
10.43
—
Blood half-life WT (h)
10.38
10.62
—
% ID/g in liver ApoE−/− (24 h p.i.)
4.24 ± 1.73
4.12 ± 0.79
—
% ID/g in liver WT (24 h p.i.)
5.62 ± 1.13
4.24 ± 1.56
—
% ID/g in spleen ApoE−/− (24 h p.i.)
4.17 ± 1.57
4.31 ± 0.70
—
% ID/g in spleen WT (24 h p.i.)
5.21 ± 1.08
4.41 ± 1.59
—
All values expressed as mean ± SD. All sizes are based upon the
weighted averages. Relaxivities shown were obtained in PBS at 128 MHz and
25°C. All blood half-lives and percentage injected (p.i.) doses (%ID/g)
in the liver and spleen were obtained in apoE−/− or
WT mice after injection of 30 μCi 125I-labeled nanoparticles.
*P < 0.05 apoE−/− vs.
WT mice. oxLDL, oxidized low-density lipoprotein; R1, longitudinal
relaxation rate; R2, transverse relaxation rate; USPIO, ultrasmall iron
oxide particle.
Fig. 1.
Characterization of iron oxide nanoparticles. A: Representative TEM image of
anti-OxLDL-USPIO nanoparticles. Upper insert shows a photograph of
anti-OxLDL-USPIO solution in PBS. B: The dynamic light scattering diameters and
(C) room-temperature magnetization curve of anti-OxLDL-USPIO and unconjugated
USPIO nanoparticles. D: The stability curves of various USPIO nanoparticles in
10% FBS or PBS by DLS measurement. ELISA results show the biological activity
of anti-OxLDL-USPIO nanoparticles, while boiled anti-OxLDL-USPIO and
unconjugated USPIO have limited nonspecific adsorption on OD450
value (E). Data presented as mean ± SD (n = 3).
Physical and chemical properties of nanoparticlesAll values expressed as mean ± SD. All sizes are based upon the
weighted averages. Relaxivities shown were obtained in PBS at 128 MHz and
25°C. All blood half-lives and percentage injected (p.i.) doses (%ID/g)
in the liver and spleen were obtained in apoE−/− or
WT mice after injection of 30 μCi 125I-labeled nanoparticles.
*P < 0.05 apoE−/− vs.
WT mice. oxLDL, oxidized low-density lipoprotein; R1, longitudinal
relaxation rate; R2, transverse relaxation rate; USPIO, ultrasmall ironoxide particle.Characterization of iron oxide nanoparticles. A: Representative TEM image of
anti-OxLDL-USPIO nanoparticles. Upper insert shows a photograph of
anti-OxLDL-USPIO solution in PBS. B: The dynamic light scattering diameters and
(C) room-temperature magnetization curve of anti-OxLDL-USPIO and unconjugated
USPIO nanoparticles. D: The stability curves of various USPIO nanoparticles in
10% FBS or PBS by DLS measurement. ELISA results show the biological activity
of anti-OxLDL-USPIO nanoparticles, while boiled anti-OxLDL-USPIO and
unconjugated USPIO have limited nonspecific adsorption on OD450
value (E). Data presented as mean ± SD (n = 3).In WT mice, the blood half-life was ∼10.5 h for targeted or untargeted IgG-USPIO
nanoparticles, consistent with the literature (32, 33). However, in
apoE−/− mice, the targeted anti-OxLDL-USPIO maintained a
longer half-life than the untargeted IgG-USPIO (14.13 h vs. 10.43 h). In addition,
there was no significant difference in the percentage injected dose (%ID/g) in the
liver and spleen between apoE−/− mice and WT mice for targeted
USPIO or untargeted IgG-USPIO nanoparticles 24 h after 125I-labeled
anti-OxLDL-USPIO or 125I-labeled IgG-USPIO injection (Table 1).
In vitro studies
summarizes the in vitro
macrophage experiments assessing the association and uptake of the four types of
USPIO nanoparticles by RAW264.7 macrophages under four conditions. Perl's
staining showed that the highest uptake of iron oxide nanoparticles was when both the
macrophages and anti-OxLDL-USPIO nanoparticles were preexposed to OxLDL (Fig. 2D). On the other hand, when macrophages
were preexposed to OxLDL but the anti-OxLDL-USPIO nanoparticles were not (Fig. 2B) or when the anti-OxLDL-USPIO
nanoparticles was preexposed to OxLDL but the macrophages were not (Fig. 2C), the uptake of iron oxide nanoparticles
was very limited. Cells incubated with untargeted IgG-USPIO (Fig. 2E–H) and unconjugated-USPIO nanoparticles (Fig. 2I, L) showed much less USPIO staining under
all conditions. The results suggest that the PEG-coated USPIO nanoparticles
significantly inhibited the nonspecific uptake of nanoparticles by RAW264.7
macrophages. However, because anti-OxLDL-USPIO nanoparticles may bind free mouse
OxLDL in DMEM, they could be taken up as OxLDL/anti-OxLDL-USPIO complexes by
activated foaming macrophages (induced by preexposing to OxLDL for 12 h, Oil O
staining proved; data not shown). As anticipated, Resovist showed a large macrophage
uptake (Fig. 2M).
Fig. 2.
Macrophages uptake of USPIO nanoparticles. In vitro RAW264.7 macrophages uptake
of targeted USPIO, untarget USPIO, and unconjugated USPIO nanoparticles (as
negative control) and Resovist (as positive control) with 100 μg Fe/ml for
12 h. Perl's staining for iron oxide uptake was performed. Macrophages
were preincubated (+) or not preincubated (−) to mouse OxLDL (100
μg /ml) for 12 h, and iron oxide nanoparticles were preincubated (+) or
not preincubated (−) to mouse OxLDL (100 μg /ml) for 2 h before being
mixed together in cell culture. Bar = 20 μm.
Macrophages uptake of USPIO nanoparticles. In vitro RAW264.7 macrophages uptake
of targeted USPIO, untarget USPIO, and unconjugated USPIO nanoparticles (as
negative control) and Resovist (as positive control) with 100 μg Fe/ml for
12 h. Perl's staining for iron oxide uptake was performed. Macrophages
were preincubated (+) or not preincubated (−) to mouse OxLDL (100
μg /ml) for 12 h, and iron oxide nanoparticles were preincubated (+) or
not preincubated (−) to mouse OxLDL (100 μg /ml) for 2 h before being
mixed together in cell culture. Bar = 20 μm.
In vivo MRI studies
Next, we administered 30 mg iron/kg body of the prepared iron oxide nanoparticles to
apoE−/− mice with perivascular collar induced carotid
atherosclerosis. shows
representative in vivo MR images of the atherosclerotic carotid lesions obtained
before and 8 h and 24 h after the injection of the different USPIO formulations.
Fig. 3A–C shows that significant
signal loss is observed at 8 h and 24 h after the administration of targeted
anti-OxLDL-USPIO nanoparticles (red arrow), and the presence of iron is confirmed by
Perl's staining (Fig. 3D). There were 66
matched image pairs available (24 for anti-OxLDL-USPIO, 16 for untargeted IgG-USPIO,
16 for unconjugated USPIO nanoparticles and 10 for competitive inhibition group,
3–5 image pairs obtained from each mouse) for further comparative analysis. The
relative signal intensity changes were −30.4 ± 16% and −34.7
± 19% for 8 h and 24 h after injection (n = 24). Untargeted IgG-USPIO
(Fig. 3E–H) and unconjugated USPIO
nanoparticles (Fig. 3I–L) had limited
relative signal intensity changes (4.2 ± 17.4% and −4.8 ± 15.8%
for untargeted IgG-USPIO nanoparticles [n = 16] and −0.01 ± 27.6%
and 1.39 ± 19.0% for unconjugated USPIO nanoparticles [n = 16]). In
addition, the simultaneous administration of sufficient free anti-OxLDL antibody with
the anti-OxLDL-USPIO nanoparticles significantly inhibited the change in relative
signal intensity (−6.9 ± 17.5% and −8.2 ± 16.1%, n =
10, p < 0.05) (Fig.
3M–P) ().
Furthermore, there is a strong correlation between OxLDL/macrophages (CD68+) and
positive Perl's staining (), confirming the deposition of anti-OxLDL-USPIO
nanoparticles in OxLDL enriched macrophages and foam cells. Conversely, even with
OxLDL/macrophages (CD68+) present, there is only limited USPIO nanoparticle
deposition in atherosclerotic lesions for the competitive inhibition groups (Fig. 5B, F, J, N), the nonspecific IgG-USPIO
nanoparticles (Fig. 5C, G, K, O), and
unconjugated USPIO nanoparticles (Fig, 5D, H, L,
P).
Fig. 3.
USPIOs MRI of apoE−/− mice. Representative in vivo
carotid atherosclerotic lesion enhancement in apoE−/−
mice before and 8 h and 24 h after administration of targeted USPIO, untargeted
USPIO, unconjugated USPIO nanoparticles and competitive inhibition (free
antibody + anti-OxLDL-USPIO) with a dose of 30 mg Fe/kg body weight. The
red arrows indicate the location of signal loss within the plaque. Matched
Perl's stained section shows USPIO nanoparticle deposition (blue) within
the arterial wall. Bar = 100 μm.
Fig. 4.
Relative signal intensity changes among different groups. Comparisons of the
relative signal intensity changes (NENH%) in the T2-weighted images
associated with the carotid arterial wall before and after administration of
USPIO nanoparticles are shown. * P < 0.05 vs.
targeted USPIO group.
Fig. 5.
Immunohistochemistry of carotid lesions of apoE−/− mice.
Immunohistochemistry of targeted USPIO, untargeted USPIO, and unconjugated
USPIO nanoparticles and competitive inhibition groups in the carotid arterial
wall of apoE−/− mice. The carotid arteries wall was
stained for OxLDL, macrophage (CD68), and iron oxide (Perl's) deposition
(bar = 100 μm). Red arrows indicate the location of iron oxide
deposition while OxLDL and macrophages are high expressed in the targeted USPIO
group.
USPIOs MRI of apoE−/− mice. Representative in vivo
carotid atherosclerotic lesion enhancement in apoE−/−
mice before and 8 h and 24 h after administration of targeted USPIO, untargeted
USPIO, unconjugated USPIO nanoparticles and competitive inhibition (free
antibody + anti-OxLDL-USPIO) with a dose of 30 mg Fe/kg body weight. The
red arrows indicate the location of signal loss within the plaque. Matched
Perl's stained section shows USPIO nanoparticle deposition (blue) within
the arterial wall. Bar = 100 μm.Relative signal intensity changes among different groups. Comparisons of the
relative signal intensity changes (NENH%) in the T2-weighted images
associated with the carotid arterial wall before and after administration of
USPIO nanoparticles are shown. * P < 0.05 vs.
targeted USPIO group.Immunohistochemistry of carotid lesions of apoE−/− mice.
Immunohistochemistry of targeted USPIO, untargeted USPIO, and unconjugated
USPIO nanoparticles and competitive inhibition groups in the carotid arterial
wall of apoE−/− mice. The carotid arteries wall was
stained for OxLDL, macrophage (CD68), and iron oxide (Perl's) deposition
(bar = 100 μm). Red arrows indicate the location of iron oxide
deposition while OxLDL and macrophages are high expressed in the targeted USPIO
group.
Deposition of anti-OxLDL-USPIO nanoparticles in glomerulus
As in previous studies (34), the PEG-coating
does not preclude the final accumulation of USPIO nanoparticles in the
reticuloendothelial system because considerable particle uptake was observed in the
liver and spleen 24 h after administration (Table
1). However, in an unanticipated finding, histological staining showed a
large amount of anti-OxLDL-USPIO nanoparticles deposited in one mouse kidney
glomerulus ().
Furthermore, the presence of macrophages and OxLDL in this glomerulus was confirmed
by immunohistochemical staining (Fig.
6B–C, red arrow). In contrast, the other mouse glomeruli in the
anti-OxLDL-USPIO group showed limited iron oxide deposition by Perl's staining
(Fig. 6D) with corresponding limited
staining for OxLDL and CD68 (Fig.
6E–F).
Fig. 6.
Immunohistochemistry for glomerulus of apoE−/− mice.
Histology and immunohistochemistry for targeted USPIO nanoparticles in kidney
glomerulus in apoE−/− mice. The staining is positive for
iron oxide deposition (Perl's), OxLDL, and macrophages (CD68) (A–C;
red arrow) in kidney glomerulus in apoE−/− mice. The
absence of iron oxide deposition in the glomerulus (D) of a control
apoE−/− mouse with limited OxLDL and CD68 expression
(E, F) is shown. Bar = 100 μm.
Immunohistochemistry for glomerulus of apoE−/− mice.
Histology and immunohistochemistry for targeted USPIO nanoparticles in kidney
glomerulus in apoE−/− mice. The staining is positive for
iron oxide deposition (Perl's), OxLDL, and macrophages (CD68) (A–C;
red arrow) in kidney glomerulus in apoE−/− mice. The
absence of iron oxide deposition in the glomerulus (D) of a control
apoE−/− mouse with limited OxLDL and CD68 expression
(E, F) is shown. Bar = 100 μm.
DISCUSSION
OxLDL is primarily present in atherosclerotic lesions but not in normal arteries and is
associated with increased plaque inflammation and plaque vulnerability. Because of its
prominent role in atherosclerosis, OxLDL-targeted molecular imaging has become an area
of great research interest (10, 11, 35–38). Although antibodies
against different oxidation-specific epitopes have been generated, antibody selection
for OxLDL detection is still controversial because of specificity to a single OxLDL
epitope (13). To address this challenge, a
polyclonal anti-OxLDL antibody may have advantages for detecting OxLDL in vivo due to
its ability to bind multiple oxLDL epitopes.In our preliminary studies, a polyclonal rabbit anti-copper-oxidemouse LDL was
produced, and in vitro ELISA assays demonstrated that this polyclonal anti-OxLDL
antibody has a high binding specificity to copper-oxidemouse LDL but not to normal
mouse LDL. Using this anti-copper-oxide OxLDL antibody, we synthesized a biocompatible,
stable, OxLDL-targeted USPIO functioning as an MRI molecular imaging contrast agent in
the current study. PEG-coated USPIO using α,ω-dicarboxyl-terminated PEG as a
surface capping molecule through a “one-pot reaction” was used (28), which has been well reported to have in vivo
tumor detection (25–27). This probe was then used to image carotid atherosclerosis in
apoE−/− mice with lesions initiated by bilateral perivascular
collar (16). Importantly, we have shown that
OxLDL-enriched atherosclerotic lesions can be noninvasively imaged from 8 h to 24 h
after anti-OxLDL-USPIO administration. In addition, cotreatment of animals with free
anti-OxLDL antibody and anti-OxLDL-USPIO nanoparticles resulted in reduced MR signal
changes that may be due to the blocking of available antibody binding sites, similar to
Briley-Saebo et al. (12). To our knowledge,
this is the first time that OxLDL-targeted USPIO nanoparticles have been used in carotid
atherosclerotic lesions of apoE−/− mice. To identify and quantify
OxLDL within atherosclerotic lesions, in vivo MRI with targeted probe indicates an
important step toward the detection of vulnerable plaques (8, 10).Sinerem (Ferumoxtran-10; Guerbet, Roissy, France), a commercial dextran-coated USPIO
nanoparticle, has been used in clinical studies to identify carotid plaque inflammation
(31, 39) and to assess therapeutic response to atorvastatin therapy (21). These dextran-coated iron oxide particles are
passively taken up by a variety of activated macrophages within the artery wall and are
best imaged 24–36 h after administration. On the other hand, PEG-coated iron
oxides, as presented in the current work, are known to reduce plasma protein binding,
delay clearance by the reticuloendothelial system, and increase particle circulation
times (25, 26, 29). These factors increase the
probability of the targeted iron oxide nanoparticles reaching the tissue of interest
(28). Our in vitro experiments confirmed
that the PEG-coated USPIOs are not passively taken up by macrophages or foam cells
(macrophages exposed to OxLDL for 12 h), except when they are conjugated to anti-OxLDL
antibody and after binding free OxLDL (Fig. 2D)
(8, 10). Briley-Saebo et al. (8) demonstrated that OSE-targeted, PEG-coated
nanoparticles (lipid-coated SPIO or lipid-coated USPIO nanoparticles) may bind
extracellular OxLDL or OxLDL bound to macrophage scavenger receptors and selectively
accumulate within lipid-rich J774A.1 macrophages and foam cells. Our in vitro data show
similar results in RAW264.7 macrophages. Future studies are warranted to evaluate the
immune response to the polyclonal antibodies and the mechanism of uptake for targeted
PEG-coated USPIO by macrophages.Targeted anti-OxLDL-USPIO nanoparticles exhibited a significantly longer circulating
half-life than the untargeted IgG-USPIO. However, this was noted only in
apoE−/− mice, which may have higher levels of circulating
OxLDL in the blood and vessel wall, similar to the previous studies (8). It is expected that the binding of targeted
anti-OxLDL-USPIO nanoparticles to circulating OxLDL may have reduced blood clearance
(8, 35). For imaging, the increased blood half-life of the targeted nanoparticles
was likely beneficial because it allows greater time for accumulation of the particles
within the arterial wall and greater uptake by macrophages.In a related study, Briley-Saebo et al. (8) used MDA2, E06, and IK17 PEG-linked to the
surface of lipid coated USPIO nanoparticles to construct iron oxide probes targeted to
OSE and imaged the nanoparticles in an apoE−/− mouse aorta
atherosclerotic plaque model. The MRI results showed significant signal loss 24 h after
administration of all the oxidation-specific epitope targeted LUSPIO formulations
(MDA2-LUSPIO, E06-LUSPIO, and IK17-LUSPIO) in apoE−/− mice and
was confirmed by gradient echo acquisition for superparamagnetic particles with positive
contrast images and histology. In addition, MDA2, E06, and IK17 linked to the surface of
micelles containing gadolinium (10) or MDA2,
E06, and IK17 linked to the surface of micelles containing manganese (9) have been used to detect OSE in aortic
atherosclerotic lesions in apoE−/− mice and
LDLR−/− mice. However, monoantibodies, such as MDA2, E06, and
IK17, can only detect single oxidation-specific epitopes in atherosclerotic lesions.
Furthermore, these antibodies were not available for most laboratories. Finally, the
animal models used in the study by Briley-Saebo et al. study have several disadvantages.
Although the aortic atherosclerotic lesions are relatively straightforward to locate for
histological processing, thereby making it easy to standardize across experiments and
laboratories, it does not exhibit intraplaque hemorrhage or any other sign of plaque
disruption in apoE−/− mice or LDLR−/−
mice, even after extended periods of fat feeding (14). The use of aortic atherosclerotic lesions for investigations of plaque
rupture is still controversial (15, 40).In comparison, the perivascular collar model used in current study offers the advantage
of maintaining the structural integrity of the endothelium while inducing rapid,
site-controlled atherosclerotic lesions formation (16). First, carotid plaques induced by perivascular collar develop much
faster than those of other models. Rapid atherogenesis allows efficient screening of
potentially antiatherogenic new chemical entities and the valuation of therapies with a
limited duration of effectiveness. Second, lesions in this perivascular collar model
develop immediately proximal to the collar, elicited by low wall shear stress in this
region, and are strictly dependent on the presence of hypercholesterolemia, which the
two key etiologic factors are known to drive spontaneous humanatherosclerosis. Third,
the carotid artery of apoE−/− mice is easily accessible and can
be repeatedly exposed for gene or pharmacological interventions (16, 41, 42).The current studies using polyclonal anti-OxLDL antibody conjugated USPIO nanoparticles
targeted to OxLDL in vivo show significant signal loss in carotid atherosclerotic
lesions at 8 h after administration that remains at 24 h in T2-weighted MR images.
Immunohistochemistry confirmed the colocalization of the OxLDL/macrophages and ironoxide nanoparticles. Moreover, the simultaneous administration of sufficient free
anti-OxLDL antibody with the anti-OxLDL-USPIO nanoparticles significantly inhibited the
change in relative signal intensity. These results indicate that a polyclonal anti-OxLDL
antibody can be used for the molecular imaging of OxLDL in vivo with sensitivity similar
to monoclonal antibodies or fragments and validate that noninvasive imaging of OxLDL
within the atherosclerotic lesions is possible by using OxLDL-targeted nanoparticles. If
translated to clinical applications, this approach may provide a valuable tool for
noninvasively detecting, quantifying, and monitoring vulnerable atherosclerotic
plaques.An unexpected finding was the deposition of anti-OxLDL-USPIO nanoparticles in the kidney
glomerulus of one apoE−/− mouse, which was colocalized with OxLDL
and CD68(+) macrophages. First, this proves that anti-OxLDL-USPIO nanoparticles
target OxLDL beyond carotid atherosclerotic plaque lesions. This potential is
encouraging because OxLDL and oxidative stress play key roles in the development of
glomerular disease. Second, it provides further evidence of the specificity of
anti-OxLDL-USPIO nanoparticles to OxLDL and macrophages, especially OxLDL-enriched and
activated macrophages.Limitations of the current study include the fact that we can only hypothesize as to the
mechanism of targeted-USPIO nanoparticle uptake and the degree of immune response to the
polyclonal antibodies. These questions require multistaged future investigations.
Another limitation of our in vivo approach was the large USPIO dose compared with
clinical studies (30 mg iron/kg vs. 5.6 mg iron/kg body weight), although no clinical
signs of toxicity were observed during or after iron oxide administration. One challenge
is that neovascularization in carotid atherosclerotic lesions is far less than in aortic
atherosclerotic lesions in apoE−/− mice (43), and neovascularization in the neointima plays a pivotal role
for USPIO nanoparticle deposition into plaque. Another challenge is that USPIOs less
than 25 nm in diameter may diffuse in the plaques more easily because the aorta
endothelial tight gap junction associated with the plaque is approximately 20 nm in
apoE−/− mice (8).
Advancements in the “one-pot” reaction process have led to a new kind of
biocompatible Fe3O4 nanocrystal with a smaller mean size (6.6
± 1.1 nm) that is now commercially available (http://www.oneder-hightech.com). We anticipate that future studies using
this smaller-sized USPIO nanoparticles could reduce the USPIO dose.In conclusion, the present study demonstrates a novel method for noninvasively imaging
an important mediator of cardiovascular disease, OxLDL, within carotid atherosclerotic
lesions. Additionally, these OxLDL-targeted USPIO nanoparticles may have the potential
to noninvasively image glomerular disease. Continuing studies are warranted to confirm
these encouraging results.
Authors: Rikin A Trivedi; Chinthake Mallawarachi; Jean-Marie U-King-Im; Martin J Graves; Jo Horsley; Martin J Goddard; Andrew Brown; Liqun Wang; Peter J Kirkpatrick; John Brown; Jonathan H Gillard Journal: Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol Date: 2006-04-20 Impact factor: 8.311
Authors: Tobias Saam; Thomas S Hatsukami; Norihide Takaya; Baocheng Chu; Hunter Underhill; William S Kerwin; Jianming Cai; Marina S Ferguson; Chun Yuan Journal: Radiology Date: 2007-07 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Jan H von der Thüsen; Bart J M van Vlijmen; Rob C Hoeben; Mark M Kockx; Louis M Havekes; Theo J C van Berkel; Erik A L Biessen Journal: Circulation Date: 2002-04-30 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Jason Johnson; Kevin Carson; Helen Williams; Sharada Karanam; Andrew Newby; Gianni Angelini; Sarah George; Christopher Jackson Journal: Circulation Date: 2005-03-22 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Valentin Fuster; Pedro R Moreno; Zahi A Fayad; Roberto Corti; Juan J Badimon Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2005-09-20 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Patrick M Winter; Anne M Morawski; Shelton D Caruthers; Ralph W Fuhrhop; Huiying Zhang; Todd A Williams; John S Allen; Elizabeth K Lacy; J David Robertson; Gregory M Lanza; Samuel A Wickline Journal: Circulation Date: 2003-10-13 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Karen C Briley-Saebo; Willem J M Mulder; Venkatesh Mani; Fabien Hyafil; Vardan Amirbekian; Juan Gilberto S Aguinaldo; Edward A Fisher; Zahi A Fayad Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2007-09 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Rikin A Trivedi; Jean-Marie U-King-Im; Martin J Graves; Justin J Cross; Jo Horsley; Martin J Goddard; Jeremy N Skepper; George Quartey; Elizabeth Warburton; Ilse Joubert; Liqun Wang; Peter J Kirkpatrick; John Brown; Jonathan H Gillard Journal: Stroke Date: 2004-05-27 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Laura Rueda-Gensini; Javier Cifuentes; Maria Claudia Castellanos; Paola Ruiz Puentes; Julian A Serna; Carolina Muñoz-Camargo; Juan C Cruz Journal: Nanomaterials (Basel) Date: 2020-09-11 Impact factor: 5.076