Literature DB >> 14608313

Hamstring insertion site healing after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in patients with symptomatic hardware or repeat rupture: a histologic study in 12 patients.

Henri Robert1, Jaffar Es-Sayeh, Dominique Heymann, Norbert Passuti, Serge Eloit, Eric Vaneenoge.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Our goal was to characterize the type of biologic anchor of hamstring tendons to the femoral tunnel in cases of transfixion fixation for the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. The histologic bone-hamstring tendon anchorage is not yet clearly understood despite many experimental and some clinical studies. It constitutes the weak point of the ACL reconstruction. The type of fixation, either distant from the joint such as transfixion fixation or at the tunnel entrance such as aperture fixation will determine a specific tendon-bone healing process. TYPE OF STUDY: Histological study.
METHODS: We performed ACL reconstruction with 4 strands of semitendinosus and gracilis tendons fastened by a transfixion fixation. Femoral fixation was secured by transfixion (Transfix; Arthrex, Naples, CA) and tibia fixation by a biodegradable interference screw and 2 staples. Between 3 and 20 months after surgery, we performed 12 hamstring tendon biopsies (in 9 men and 3 women; mean age, 29 years). Biopsies were performed 2 cm from the femoral outlet in 10 patients undergoing hardware removal or by coring the femoral tunnel in 2 cases of repeat rupture. In 8 cases, the femoral device was removed for persistent lateral pain, in 2 cases for instability of the hardware, and in 2 cases a repeat rupture of the graft occurred. The samples were taken by coring a tunnel 5 mm in diameter, with a tubular harvester, along the femoral Transfix axis. Each fragment was stained with H&E, Solochrome cyanine, or Masson-trichrome, and microscopical examination was performed, including polarized light.
RESULTS: At 3 months (in 1 case), a fibrovascular interface was seen between the tendon and uncalcified osteoid with very few collagen fibers. At 5 and 6 months (in 2 cases), some Sharpey-like fibers and less immature woven bone was seen. Maturity of the secondary insertion was seen after at least 10 months in 5 cases. In 2 cases, no contact was seen at the biopsy site despite good clinical stability. The 2 remaining cases underwent repeat rupture at the midsubstance of the graft at 12 and 17 months after surgery. In the first case, the tendon-bone fixation was limited at the outlet of the femoral tunnel with no fixation inside the tunnel. In the second case, the fixation was continuous with Sharpey fibers along the tunnel.
CONCLUSIONS: According to our histologic results in patients, the time to obtain a mature indirect anchorage at the top of the tunnel was 10 to 12 months, which is much longer than in reported animal models (6 to 24 weeks). To our knowledge, this is the first clinical study reporting the histologic type of femoral ligament insertion 2 cm from the outlet of the tunnel with hamstring autograft for ACL reconstruction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14608313     DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2003.09.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthroscopy        ISSN: 0749-8063            Impact factor:   4.772


  14 in total

1.  The role of periosteal flap in the prevention of femoral widening in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using hamstring tendons.

Authors:  Henri Robert; Jaffar Es-Sayeh
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2003-09-09       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using biodegradable transfemoral fixation at 5-year follow-up: clinical and magnetic resonance imaging evaluation.

Authors:  Sven Nebelung; Gregor Deitmer; Rolf Gebing; Frank Reichwein; Wolfgang Nebelung
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-03-06       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Modified Prusik knot versus whipstitch technique for soft tissue fixation in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a biomechanical analysis.

Authors:  Dietmar Krappinger; Franz Sebastian Kralinger; Rene El Attal; Wolfgang Hackl; Christian Haid
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2006-08-15       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Soft tissue graft interference fit fixation: observations on graft insertion site healing and tunnel remodeling 2 years after ACL reconstruction in sheep.

Authors:  Patrick Hunt; Oliver Rehm; Andreas Weiler
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2006-05-19       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  An histological study of the influence of osteoinductive calcium phosphate ceramics on tendon healing pattern in a bone tunnel with suspensory fixation.

Authors:  Hao Shen; Gang Qiao; Hongbin Cao; Yao Jiang
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2009-06-12       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 6.  Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound therapy: a potential strategy to stimulate tendon-bone junction healing.

Authors:  Zhi-min Ying; Tiao Lin; Shi-gui Yan
Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 3.066

7.  A comparison of four tibial-fixation systems in hamstring-graft anterior ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Henri Robert; Mark Bowen; Guillaume Odry; Michel Collette; Xavier Cassard; Hubert Lanternier; Thierry De Polignac
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2014-05-10

8.  Evaluation of the vascular status of autogenous hamstring tendon grafts after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in humans using magnetic resonance angiography.

Authors:  Yuji Arai; Kunio Hara; Takeshi Takahashi; Hidenori Urade; Ginjiro Minami; Hisatake Takamiya; Toshikazu Kubo
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2008-01-09       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  Kartogenin induces cartilage-like tissue formation in tendon-bone junction.

Authors:  Jianying Zhang; James H-C Wang
Journal:  Bone Res       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 13.567

10.  Chronological changes in the collagen-type composition at tendon-bone interface in rabbits.

Authors:  K Tabuchi; T Soejima; T Kanazawa; K Noguchi; K Nagata
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2012-09-01       Impact factor: 5.853

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.