INTRODUCTION: Cholecystectomy is the standard treatment for patients with acute cholecystitis. However, percutaneous cholecystostomy (PC) is an alternative for patients at high risk for surgery. We present our five-year clinical experience with the aim of evaluating the efficacy of PC in high risk patients. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed on 30 consecutive patients who underwent PC at our institution. The indications for cholecystostomy, route of insertion, technical success, clinical improvement, length of hospitalisation, in-hospital or 30-day mortality, complications, subsequent admissions and performance of interval cholecystectomy were recorded. The median follow-up period was 25 months (range: 1-52 months). RESULTS: Thirty-two PCs were performed in thirty patients (mean age: 76.1 years; range: 52-90 years). The indications for PC were acute calculous cholecystitis (29/32), acalculous cholecystitis (1/32) and emphysematous cholecystitis (2/32). The route of insertion was transperitoneal for 22/32 PCs (68.8%) and transhepatic for 10/32 (31.2%). The procedure was technically successful in all patients although 2/22 transperitoneal drains (9.1%) were dislodged subsequently. Twenty-seven PCs (84.4%) resulted in clinical improvement within five days. The in-hospital or 30-day mortality rate was 16.7% (5/30). Eleven patients (36.7%) had a subsequent cholecystectomy: 6 were laparoscopic and 5 converted to open procedures at a median interval of 58 days (range: 1-124 days). CONCLUSIONS: PCs are straightforward with few complications. Most patients improve clinically and the procedure can therefore be used as a definitive treatment in unfit patients or as a bridge to surgery in those who might subsequently prove fit for a definitive operation.
INTRODUCTION: Cholecystectomy is the standard treatment for patients with acute cholecystitis. However, percutaneous cholecystostomy (PC) is an alternative for patients at high risk for surgery. We present our five-year clinical experience with the aim of evaluating the efficacy of PC in high risk patients. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed on 30 consecutive patients who underwent PC at our institution. The indications for cholecystostomy, route of insertion, technical success, clinical improvement, length of hospitalisation, in-hospital or 30-day mortality, complications, subsequent admissions and performance of interval cholecystectomy were recorded. The median follow-up period was 25 months (range: 1-52 months). RESULTS: Thirty-two PCs were performed in thirty patients (mean age: 76.1 years; range: 52-90 years). The indications for PC were acute calculous cholecystitis (29/32), acalculous cholecystitis (1/32) and emphysematous cholecystitis (2/32). The route of insertion was transperitoneal for 22/32 PCs (68.8%) and transhepatic for 10/32 (31.2%). The procedure was technically successful in all patients although 2/22 transperitoneal drains (9.1%) were dislodged subsequently. Twenty-seven PCs (84.4%) resulted in clinical improvement within five days. The in-hospital or 30-day mortality rate was 16.7% (5/30). Eleven patients (36.7%) had a subsequent cholecystectomy: 6 were laparoscopic and 5 converted to open procedures at a median interval of 58 days (range: 1-124 days). CONCLUSIONS: PCs are straightforward with few complications. Most patients improve clinically and the procedure can therefore be used as a definitive treatment in unfit patients or as a bridge to surgery in those who might subsequently prove fit for a definitive operation.
Authors: S Chopra; G D Dodd; A L Mumbower; K N Chintapalli; W H Schwesinger; K R Sirinek; J P Dorman; H Rhim Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2001-04 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Kenneth S H Chok; Ferdinand S K Chu; Tan To Cheung; Vincent W T Lam; Wai Key Yuen; Kelvin K C Ng; See Ching Chan; Ronnie T P Poon; Chun Yeung; Chung Mau Lo; Sheung Tat Fan Journal: ANZ J Surg Date: 2010-04 Impact factor: 1.872
Authors: Michael F Byrne; Paul Suhocki; Robert M Mitchell; Theodore N Pappas; Helen L Stiffler; Paul S Jowell; Malcolm S Branch; John Baillie Journal: J Am Coll Surg Date: 2003-08 Impact factor: 6.113
Authors: Eric J Silberfein; Wei Zhou; Panagiotis Kougias; Hosam F El Sayed; Tam T Huynh; Daniel Albo; David H Berger; F Charles Brunicardi; Peter H Lin Journal: Am J Surg Date: 2007-11 Impact factor: 2.565
Authors: Peter C Ambe; Sarantos Kaptanis; Marios Papadakis; Sebastian A Weber; Stefan Jansen; Hubert Zirngibl Journal: Dtsch Arztebl Int Date: 2016-08-22 Impact factor: 5.594
Authors: Francisco Schlottmann; Charles Gaber; Paula D Strassle; Marco G Patti; Anthony G Charles Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2018-09-17 Impact factor: 3.452