Literature DB >> 22390320

What matters to users of services? An explorative study to promote shared decision making in health care.

Kath Padgett1, Christine Rhodes, Maureen Lumb, Penny Morris, Sue Sherwin, Jools Symons, Joannie Tate, Ken Townend.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Involving service users and carers in decisions about their health care is a key feature of health-care practice. Professional health and social care students need to develop skills and attributes to best enable this to happen. AIMS: The aims were to explore service user and carer perceptions of behaviours, attributes and context required to enable shared decision making; to compare these perceptions to those of students and academic staff with a view to utilizing the findings to inform the development of student assessment tools.
METHODS: A mixed methods approach was used including action learning groups (ALG) and an iterative process alongside a modified Delphi survey. PARTICIPANTS: The ALGs were from an existing service user and carer network. The survey was sent to sixty students, sixty academics and 30 service users from 16 different professional disciplines, spanning four Universities in England.
RESULTS: The collaborative enquiry process and survey identified general agreement that being open and honest, listening, showing respect, giving time and being up to date were important. The qualitative findings identified that individual interpretation was a key factor. An unexpected result was an insight into possible insecurities of students.
CONCLUSIONS: The findings indicate that distilling rich qualitative information into a format for student assessment tools could be problematic as the individual context could be lost, it is therefore proposed that the information could be better used as a learning rather than assessment tool. Several of those involved identified how they valued the process and found it beneficial.
© 2012 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  health care education; participative research; patient centred care; patient involvement; service user and carer involvement; shared decision making

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22390320      PMCID: PMC5060734          DOI: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2012.00767.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Expect        ISSN: 1369-6513            Impact factor:   3.377


  8 in total

Review 1.  Research guidelines for the Delphi survey technique.

Authors:  F Hasson; S Keeney; H McKenna
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 3.187

2.  Developing a service user designed tool for the assessment of student mental health nurses in practice: a collaborative process.

Authors:  Theodore Stickley; Gemma Stacey; Angie Smith; Janet Betinis; Kristian Pollock; Sarah Fairbank
Journal:  Nurse Educ Today       Date:  2010-06-11       Impact factor: 3.442

3.  Service user involvement in the assessment of a practice competency in mental health nursing - stakeholders' views and recommendations.

Authors:  Janey Speers
Journal:  Nurse Educ Pract       Date:  2007-05-30       Impact factor: 2.281

Review 4.  A socially inclusive approach to user participation in higher education.

Authors:  Lucy Simons; Steve Tee; Judith Lathlean; Abigail Burgess; Lesley Herbert; Colin Gibson
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 3.187

5.  The practice assessment of student nurses by people who use mental health services.

Authors:  Theodore Stickley; Gemma Stacey; Kristian Pollock; Angie Smith; Janet Betinis; Sarah Fairbank
Journal:  Nurse Educ Today       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 3.442

6.  UK consensus statement on the content of communication curricula in undergraduate medical education.

Authors:  Martin von Fragstein; Jonathan Silverman; Annie Cushing; Sally Quilligan; Helen Salisbury; Connie Wiskin
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2008-08-21       Impact factor: 6.251

7.  Helpfulness of mental health day care: client and staff views.

Authors:  T Ricketts; M N Kirshbaum
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 3.187

8.  The patient's role in the assessment of students' communication skills.

Authors:  Christopher S Davies; Katherine Lunn
Journal:  Nurse Educ Today       Date:  2008-10-22       Impact factor: 3.442

  8 in total
  2 in total

1.  The Use of a Two-Phase Online Delphi Panel Methodology to Inform the Concurrent Development of a School-Based Ovulatory Menstrual Health Literacy Intervention and Questionnaire.

Authors:  Felicity Roux; Sharyn Burns; HuiJun Chih; Jacqueline Hendriks
Journal:  Front Glob Womens Health       Date:  2022-05-23

2.  On speaking terms: a Delphi study on shared decision-making in maternity care.

Authors:  Marianne J Nieuwenhuijze; Irene Korstjens; Ank de Jonge; Raymond de Vries; Antoine Lagro-Janssen
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2014-07-09       Impact factor: 3.007

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.