BACKGROUND: Cognitive models of bipolar I disorder (BD) may aid in identification of children who are especially vulnerable to chronic mood dysregulation. Information-processing biases related to memory and attention likely play a role in the development and persistence of BD among adolescents; however, these biases have not been extensively studied in youth with BD. METHODS: We administered the self-referent encoding task and the dot-probe task to adolescents with bipolar I disorder (BD, n = 35) and a demographically similar healthy comparison group (HC, n = 25) at baseline, and at a 1-year follow-up in a subset of this cohort (n = 22 per group). RESULTS: At both baseline and 1-year follow-up, there were significant interactions of group (BD, HC) and valence of stimulus (positive, negative adjective) on endorsement and recall of self-referent adjectives. HC adolescents endorsed and recalled more positive self-referent adjectives at baseline and follow-up while adolescents with BD endorsed and recalled more negative self-referent adjectives at baseline but not follow-up. Over time, depression symptomatology was associated with impaired memory for positive self-referent adjectives. There were no group differences in attentional bias at either time points. CONCLUSIONS: Adolescents with BD exhibit bias away from endorsement and recall of positive adjectives, which remained stable over time and independent of mood state.
BACKGROUND: Cognitive models of bipolar I disorder (BD) may aid in identification of children who are especially vulnerable to chronic mood dysregulation. Information-processing biases related to memory and attention likely play a role in the development and persistence of BD among adolescents; however, these biases have not been extensively studied in youth with BD. METHODS: We administered the self-referent encoding task and the dot-probe task to adolescents with bipolar I disorder (BD, n = 35) and a demographically similar healthy comparison group (HC, n = 25) at baseline, and at a 1-year follow-up in a subset of this cohort (n = 22 per group). RESULTS: At both baseline and 1-year follow-up, there were significant interactions of group (BD, HC) and valence of stimulus (positive, negative adjective) on endorsement and recall of self-referent adjectives. HC adolescents endorsed and recalled more positive self-referent adjectives at baseline and follow-up while adolescents with BD endorsed and recalled more negative self-referent adjectives at baseline but not follow-up. Over time, depression symptomatology was associated with impaired memory for positive self-referent adjectives. There were no group differences in attentional bias at either time points. CONCLUSIONS: Adolescents with BD exhibit bias away from endorsement and recall of positive adjectives, which remained stable over time and independent of mood state.
Authors: B Geller; B Zimerman; M Williams; K Bolhofner; J L Craney; M P DelBello; C Soutullo Journal: J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry Date: 2001-04 Impact factor: 8.829
Authors: Roy H Perlis; Melissa P Delbello; Sachiko Miyahara; Stephen R Wisniewski; Gary S Sachs; Andrew A Nierenberg Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2005-09-28 Impact factor: 13.382
Authors: Mani N Pavuluri; Lindsay S Schenkel; Subhash Aryal; Erin M Harral; S Kristian Hill; Ellen S Herbener; John A Sweeney Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2006-02 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: Karen E Seymour; Kerri L Kim; Grace K Cushman; Megan E Puzia; Alexandra B Weissman; Thania Galvan; Daniel P Dickstein Journal: Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry Date: 2015-02-28 Impact factor: 4.785
Authors: Álvaro Frías; Daniel P Dickstein; John Merranko; Mary Kay Gill; Tina R Goldstein; Benjamin I Goldstein; Heather Hower; Shirley Yen; Danella M Hafeman; Fangzi Liao; Rasim Diler; David Axelson; Michael Strober; Jeffrey I Hunt; Neal D Ryan; Martin B Keller; Boris Birmaher Journal: Bipolar Disord Date: 2017-06-27 Impact factor: 6.744
Authors: Sabine Groch; Dana McMakin; Patrick Guggenbühl; Björn Rasch; Reto Huber; Ines Wilhelm Journal: Dev Cogn Neurosci Date: 2015-11-10 Impact factor: 6.464