| Literature DB >> 26588358 |
Sabine Groch1, Dana McMakin2, Patrick Guggenbühl1, Björn Rasch3, Reto Huber4, Ines Wilhelm5.
Abstract
The individual tendency to interpret ambiguous situations negatively is associated with mental disorders. Interpretation biases are already evident during adolescence and due to the greater plasticity of the developing brain it may be easier to change biases during this time. We investigated in healthy adolescents and adults whether stabilizing memories of positive or negative scenes modulates the later interpretation of similar scenes. In the evening, participants learnt associations between ambiguous pictures and words that disambiguate the valence of the pictures in a positive or negative direction. Half of the words were acoustically presented (i.e. cued) during post-learning sleep which is known to benefit memory consolidation by inducing reactivation of learned information. Cued compared to un-cued stimuli were remembered better the next morning. Importantly, cueing positively disambiguated pictures resulted in more positive interpretations whereas cueing negatively disambiguated pictures led to less positive interpretations of new ambiguous pictures with similar contents the next morning. These effects were not modulated by participants' age indicating that memory cueing was as efficient in adolescents as in adults. Our findings suggest that memory cueing during sleep can modify interpretation biases by benefitting memory stabilization and generalization. Implications for clinical settings are discussed.Entities:
Keywords: Development; Interpretation bias; Memory; Plasticity; Reactivation; Sleep
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26588358 PMCID: PMC6990077 DOI: 10.1016/j.dcn.2015.10.006
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Dev Cogn Neurosci ISSN: 1878-9293 Impact factor: 6.464
Fig. 1Experimental procedure and picture-word association task. (a) After placement of the electrode net participants completed a learning phase followed by immediate recall testing taking place between ∼20:00 and 22:00 h. A typical polysomnogram visualizes the proportion of sleep stages during the nocturnal retention interval (wake (W), non-rapid eye movement (Non-REM) sleep stages 1–3 (N1–N3), REM sleep) and speakers indicate that acoustic cueing was performed during N3 in the post-learning night for a maximum number of 12 times per word. The next morning, participants performed on a cued memory recall and on the generalization task. (b) Learning the picture-word association task required participants to associate ambiguous pictures with acoustically presented positive or negative words that disambiguate the pictures. Participants had to vividly imagine themselves in the situation shown on the picture. In a cued memory recall immediately after learning and in the Test Session after sleep pictures from the Learning Session were shown again one after another and participants had to recall the corresponding word. In the generalization task, a list of new ambiguous pictures (with each of the pictures corresponding to one of the old pictures with regard to its content) was presented to the participants and they were required to indicate on a 9-point scale how well a new positive and a new negative related word fits to this picture.
Sleep parameters.
| Adolescents | Adults | |
|---|---|---|
| Mean ± SEM | Mean ± SEM | |
| Sleep latency | 17.00 ± 2.52 | 26.19 ± 3.97 |
| Wake after sleep onset (%) | 9.95 ± 2.01 | 5.70 ± 2.00 |
| Non-REM 1 (%) | 3.52 ± 0.55 | 6.02 ± 0.98 |
| Non-REM 2 (%) | 44.84 ± 1.97 | 49.73 ± 1.51 |
| Non-REM 3 (%) | 32.47 ± 2.07 | 24.77 ± 1.66 |
| REM (%) | 19.17 ± 0.72 | 19.49 ± 1.06 |
| TST | 520.88 ± 9.88 | 423.96 ± 8.92 |
| Sleep efficacy | 89.03 ± 1.70 | 90.46 ± 1.50 |
Sleep parameters are given in Mean ± SEM of absolute time in minutes and percentage of total sleep time; REM = rapid eye movement sleep and TST = total sleep time.
p < 0.1 (statistical differences between age-groups are indicated).
p < 0.05 (statistical differences between age-groups are indicated).
p < 0.01 (statistical differences between age-groups are indicated).
p < 0.001 (statistical differences between age-groups are indicated).
Fig. 2Memory performance and subjective ratings of valence and arousal after post-learning sleep (in the Test Session) in adolescents (a–c) and adults (d–f). (a and d) Retention performance was increased for cued (black bars) as compared to un-cued (white bars) picture-word associations in the morning after cueing (the main effect of ‘cueing’ in a 2 (‘cueing’) × 2 (‘valence at encoding’) ANOVA is indicated). The relative difference in correctly recalled words before and after the retention interval for cued and un-cued picture-word associations with pre-sleep level being set to 100% is indicated as a measure of retention performance. (b and e) Disambiguating the pictures in a negative or positive way by associating a positive or negative word in the Learning Session modulated later ratings of pleasantness/valence of the pictures but cueing did not modulate the subjectively rated pleasantness. (c and f) The subjectively rated arousal of pictures was neither affected by the valence at encoding nor by cueing. Values are Mean ± SEM, *p ≤ 0.05, **p ≤ 0.01, ***p ≤ 0.001.
Behavioural data.
| Adolescents | Adults | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Positive | Negative | Positive | Negative | |
| Immediate recall (absolute) | 41.10 ± 1.33 | 42.76 ± 1.23 | 45.37 ± 1.96 | 44.74 ± 1.94 |
| Immediate recall (relative) | 70.76 ± 2.25% | 72.73 ± 2.21% | 74.56 ± 3.23% | 75.61 ± 3.26% |
It contains the behavioural data for encoding (immediate recall), the number of gains and losses after cueing as well as the rated fit of positive and negative words to new ambiguous pictures during the generalization task.
Fig. 3Generalization of the positive and negative disambiguation of pictures to new ambiguous pictures. Cueing did substantially modulate positive interpretation of new ambiguous pictures in dependence of the learnt valence of the corresponding picture at encoding (interaction ‘cueing’ × ‘valence at encoding’ is indicated, cued interpretations: black bars; un-cued interpretations: white bars). In both age-groups, cued as compared to un-cued positively disambiguated pictures led to more positive interpretation of new ambiguous pictures as indicated by a higher fit of positive new words to the picture whereas cueing negatively disambiguated pictures led to a lower fit of positive new words to new ambiguous pictures. Word-picture fit is indicated on a 9-point scale (1 = very low fit and 9 = perfect fit). ***p ≤ 0.001.