Literature DB >> 22389443

Phylogenetic signal and noise: predicting the power of a data set to resolve phylogeny.

Jeffrey P Townsend1, Zhuo Su, Yonas I Tekle.   

Abstract

A principal objective for phylogenetic experimental design is to predict the power of a data set to resolve nodes in a phylogenetic tree. However, proactively assessing the potential for phylogenetic noise compared with signal in a candidate data set has been a formidable challenge. Understanding the impact of collection of additional sequence data to resolve recalcitrant internodes at diverse historical times will facilitate increasingly accurate and cost-effective phylogenetic research. Here, we derive theory based on the fundamental unit of the phylogenetic tree, the quartet, that applies estimates of the state space and the rates of evolution of characters in a data set to predict phylogenetic signal and phylogenetic noise and therefore to predict the power to resolve internodes. We develop and implement a Monte Carlo approach to estimating power to resolve as well as deriving a nearly equivalent faster deterministic calculation. These approaches are applied to describe the distribution of potential signal, polytomy, or noise for two example data sets, one recent (cytochrome c oxidase I and 28S ribosomal rRNA sequences from Diplazontinae parasitoid wasps) and one deep (eight nuclear genes and a phylogenomic sequence for diverse microbial eukaryotes including Stramenopiles, Alveolata, and Rhizaria). The predicted power of resolution for the loci analyzed is consistent with the historic use of the genes in phylogenetics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22389443     DOI: 10.1093/sysbio/sys036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Syst Biol        ISSN: 1063-5157            Impact factor:   15.683


  36 in total

1.  Inferring ancient divergences requires genes with strong phylogenetic signals.

Authors:  Leonidas Salichos; Antonis Rokas
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2013-05-08       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  The molecular symplesiomorphies shared by the stem groups of metazoan evolution: can sites as few as 1% have a significant impact on recognizing the phylogenetic position of myzostomida?

Authors:  Yanhui Wang; Qiang Xie
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2014-08-17       Impact factor: 2.395

3.  Neutral Theory and the Somatic Evolution of Cancer.

Authors:  Vincent L Cannataro; Jeffrey P Townsend
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 16.240

4.  Estimating Bayesian Phylogenetic Information Content.

Authors:  Paul O Lewis; Ming-Hui Chen; Lynn Kuo; Louise A Lewis; Karolina Fučíková; Suman Neupane; Yu-Bo Wang; Daoyuan Shi
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2016-05-06       Impact factor: 15.683

5.  More on the Best Evolutionary Rate for Phylogenetic Analysis.

Authors:  Seraina Klopfstein; Tim Massingham; Nick Goldman
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 15.683

6.  Early and multiple origins of metastatic lineages within primary tumors.

Authors:  Zi-Ming Zhao; Bixiao Zhao; Yalai Bai; Atila Iamarino; Stephen G Gaffney; Joseph Schlessinger; Richard P Lifton; David L Rimm; Jeffrey P Townsend
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-02-08       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Phylogenetic informativeness reconciles ray-finned fish molecular divergence times.

Authors:  Alex Dornburg; Jeffrey P Townsend; Matt Friedman; Thomas J Near
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2014-08-08       Impact factor: 3.260

Review 8.  Inferring the Origin of Metastases from Cancer Phylogenies.

Authors:  Woo Suk Hong; Max Shpak; Jeffrey P Townsend
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2015-08-10       Impact factor: 12.701

9.  Genome-wide identification and phylogenetic analysis of plant RNA binding proteins comprising both RNA recognition motifs and contiguous glycine residues.

Authors:  Martin Lewinski; Armin Hallmann; Dorothee Staiger
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomics       Date:  2015-11-20       Impact factor: 3.291

10.  Evolutionary Rate Variation among Lineages in Gene Trees has a Negative Impact on Species-Tree Inference.

Authors:  Mezzalina Vankan; Simon Y W Ho; David A Duchêne
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2022-02-10       Impact factor: 15.683

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.