Literature DB >> 22389092

Noise-induced hearing threshold shift among US adults and implications for noise-induced hearing loss: National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys.

Hossein Mahboubi1, Shawn Zardouz, Sepehr Oliaei, Deyu Pan, Mohsen Bazargan, Hamid R Djalilian.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to estimate the prevalence and evaluate the associated risk factors of the noise-induced hearing threshold shift (NITS) in the US adult population based on the National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys (NHANES). The study population consisted of 5,418 individuals aged 20-69 years who had complete audiologic data from the NHANES database. Stringent criteria were used to define NITS. Prevalence of unilateral, bilateral, and total NITS and their association with several socio-demographic and hearing-related factors were evaluated. The prevalence of unilateral, bilateral, and total NITS was 9.4, 3.4 and 12.8%, respectively. Prevalence of bilateral NITS was higher in subjects with older age, male gender, white (non-Hispanic) and Hispanic ethnicities, education level less than or equal to high school diploma, married/living with partner status, Mexico as country of birth, service in armed forces, smoking history, diabetes, and different kinds of noise exposure. Odds of NITS were only higher in older people, males, and smokers. This study provides comprehensive information on the prevalence of NITS in the US adult population and its associated risk factors. More targeted interventions may be done for educational, preventative, and screening purposes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22389092      PMCID: PMC3743535          DOI: 10.1007/s00405-012-1979-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0937-4477            Impact factor:   2.503


  13 in total

1.  Estimated prevalence of noise-induced hearing threshold shifts among children 6 to 19 years of age: the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988-1994, United States.

Authors:  A S Niskar; S M Kieszak; A E Holmes; E Esteban; C Rubin; D J Brody
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 7.124

2.  Noise: combating a ubiquitous and hazardous pollutant.

Authors:  Arline L. Bronzaft
Journal:  Noise Health       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 0.867

3.  Are false-positive rates leading to an overestimation of noise-induced hearing loss?

Authors:  Robert S Schlauch; Edward Carney
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2010-09-15       Impact factor: 2.297

4.  Cigarette smoking and occupational noise-induced hearing loss.

Authors:  Saber Mohammadi; Mohammad Mahdi Mazhari; Amir Houshang Mehrparvar; Mir Saeed Attarchi
Journal:  Eur J Public Health       Date:  2009-11-03       Impact factor: 3.367

5.  Some observations on the nature of the audiometric 4000 hz notch: data from 3430 veterans.

Authors:  Richard H Wilson
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 1.664

6.  Effects of cigarette smoking on hearing recovery from noise-induced temporary hearing threshold shifts in mice.

Authors:  Joong Ho Ahn; Hyun Seok Joo; Jin Kyung Suh; Harry Kim; Hong Seob So; Jong Woo Chung
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 2.311

7.  The World Health Organisation and the prevention of deafness and hearing impairment caused by noise.

Authors:  Andrew W. Smith
Journal:  Noise Health       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 0.867

8.  Prevalence of hearing loss and differences by demographic characteristics among US adults: data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1999-2004.

Authors:  Yuri Agrawal; Elizabeth A Platz; John K Niparko
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2008-07-28

9.  Risk factors for hearing loss in US adults: data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1999 to 2002.

Authors:  Yuri Agrawal; Elizabeth A Platz; John K Niparko
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 2.311

10.  The burdens of age-related and occupational noise-induced hearing loss in the United States.

Authors:  Robert A Dobie
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 3.570

View more
  15 in total

1.  Feasibility of a bilateral 4000-6000 Hz notch as a phenotype for genetic association analysis.

Authors:  Susan L Phillips; Scott J Richter; Sandra L Teglas; Ishan S Bhatt; Robin C Morehouse; Elizabeth R Hauser; Vincent C Henrich
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2015-05-04       Impact factor: 2.117

2.  Sex-Specific Prevalence, Demographic Characteristics, and Risk Factors of Tinnitus in the Hispanic Community Health Study/Study of Latinos.

Authors:  Michelle L Arnold; Sumitrajit Dhar; David J Lee; Krista M Perreira; Daniel Pupo; Athanasios Tsalatsanis; Victoria A Sanchez
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2022-01-06       Impact factor: 1.636

3.  Estimation of permanent noise-induced hearing loss in an urban setting.

Authors:  Ryan C Lewis; Robyn R M Gershon; Richard L Neitzel
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2013-05-29       Impact factor: 9.028

4.  Associations between dietary quality, noise, and hearing: data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1999-2002.

Authors:  C Spankovich; C G Le Prell
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2014-06-30       Impact factor: 2.117

5.  Hearing loss in shipyard employees.

Authors:  Evangelos C Alexopoulos; Thomaella Tsouvaltzidou
Journal:  Indian J Occup Environ Med       Date:  2015 Jan-Apr

6.  Hearing status among Norwegian train drivers and train conductors.

Authors:  A Lie; M Skogstad; T S Johnsen; B Engdahl; K Tambs
Journal:  Occup Med (Lond)       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 1.611

Review 7.  ICBEN review of research on the biological effects of noise 2011-2014.

Authors:  Mathias Basner; Mark Brink; Abigail Bristow; Yvonne de Kluizenaar; Lawrence Finegold; Jiyoung Hong; Sabine A Janssen; Ronny Klaeboe; Tony Leroux; Andreas Liebl; Toshihito Matsui; Dieter Schwela; Mariola Sliwinska-Kowalska; Patrik Sörqvist
Journal:  Noise Health       Date:  2015 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 0.867

8.  Hearing loss associated with US military combat deployment.

Authors:  Timothy S Wells; Amber D Seelig; Margaret A K Ryan; Jason M Jones; Tomoko I Hooper; Isabel G Jacobson; Edward J Boyko
Journal:  Noise Health       Date:  2015 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 0.867

9.  Otoprotective Effects of Stephania tetrandra S. Moore Herb Isolate against Acoustic Trauma.

Authors:  Yan Yu; Bing Hu; Jianxin Bao; Jessica Mulvany; Eric Bielefeld; Ryan T Harrison; Sarah A Neton; Partha Thirumala; Yingying Chen; Debin Lei; Ziyu Qiu; Qingyin Zheng; Jihao Ren; Maria Cristina Perez-Flores; Ebenezer N Yamoah; Pezhman Salehi
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2018-09-05

10.  The Impact of Different Permissible Exposure Limits on Hearing Threshold Levels Beyond 25 dBA.

Authors:  Balachandar S Sayapathi; Anselm Ting Su; David Koh
Journal:  Iran Red Crescent Med J       Date:  2014-10-05       Impact factor: 0.611

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.