Literature DB >> 21419067

Some observations on the nature of the audiometric 4000 hz notch: data from 3430 veterans.

Richard H Wilson1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Pure-tone, air-conduction audiograms notched at 4000 Hz have long been considered the signature configuration for noise-induced hearing loss even though there is an extensive literature that does not mesh with this simple explanation. There are many reports of notched audiograms from individuals with no history of noise exposure and, conversely, reports of audiograms with no notches from individuals with a history of noise exposure. Recent reports increasingly suggest that unilateral 4000 Hz notches are common. The prevalence of notched audiograms at 4000 Hz is dependent on the definition of the notch and the population under study.
PURPOSE: To examine the prevalence and characteristics of audiograms that are notched at 4000 Hz. RESEARCH
DESIGN: Retrospective, descriptive. STUDY SAMPLE: The participants were 3430 veterans evaluated in the Audiology Clinic at the VA Medical Center, Mountain Home, Tennessee. The mean age was 62.3 yr. Data Collection and Analyses: The data were collected in the course of a 60 min, routine audiological evaluation. In addition to pure-tone audiometry, a history, otoscopy, speech audiometry in quiet and in noise, and aural-acoustic immittance measures were included in the clinic protocol but were not evaluated in this report. A notch was defined when the 4000 Hz threshold minus the 2000 Hz threshold and the 4000 Hz threshold minus the 8000 Hz threshold both were ≥10 dB.
RESULTS: Overall the mean LE (left ear) thresholds at 2000, 3000, and 4000 Hz were at hearing levels 2-3 dB higher than the hearing levels for the corresponding mean RE (right ear) thresholds; the differences were significant. A notched audiogram was observed in 40.6% of the participants in at least one ear with 15.4% having bilateral notches, 28.8% LE notches, and 27.1% RE notches. Unilateral 4000 Hz notches were almost twice as prevalent as bilateral 4000 Hz notches. Viewed as a function of age, notched audiograms were most common (∼35% of the participants) in the 40 and 50 yr groups with a diminishing prevalence in the 60-80 yr groups. The mean notch depth at 4000 Hz was consistently 20-26 dB across the seven age groups. In comparison to the thresholds of the audiograms that were not notched, the thresholds of the audiograms with 4000 Hz notches (1) at 250-2000 Hz were at hearing levels 2-3 dB lower, (2) at 3000 and 4000 Hz were at hearing levels 8-17 dB higher, and (3) at 8000 Hz were at hearing levels 3-4 dB lower; the threshold differences were significant at all frequencies for both ears.
CONCLUSIONS: The data suggest that unilateral, 4000 Hz notched audiograms are as common or more common than bilateral notched audiograms and that unilateral notched audiograms are equally common for the LE and RE. The prevalence and characteristics of 4000 Hz notched audiograms in this veteran sample are similar to those observed in the population as a whole. American Academy of Audiology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21419067     DOI: 10.3766/jaaa.22.1.4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol        ISSN: 1050-0545            Impact factor:   1.664


  10 in total

1.  Feasibility of a bilateral 4000-6000 Hz notch as a phenotype for genetic association analysis.

Authors:  Susan L Phillips; Scott J Richter; Sandra L Teglas; Ishan S Bhatt; Robin C Morehouse; Elizabeth R Hauser; Vincent C Henrich
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2015-05-04       Impact factor: 2.117

2.  Noise-induced hearing threshold shift among US adults and implications for noise-induced hearing loss: National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys.

Authors:  Hossein Mahboubi; Shawn Zardouz; Sepehr Oliaei; Deyu Pan; Mohsen Bazargan; Hamid R Djalilian
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2012-03-03       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Classifying human audiometric phenotypes of age-related hearing loss from animal models.

Authors:  Judy R Dubno; Mark A Eckert; Fu-Shing Lee; Lois J Matthews; Richard A Schmiedt
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2013-06-06

4.  The influence of self-reported noise exposure on 2ƒ12 distortion product otoacoustic emission level, fine structure, and components in a normal-hearing population.

Authors:  Gayla L Poling; Jonathan H Siegel; Jungwha Lee; Sumitrajit Dhar
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2022-04       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  The prevalence of notched audiograms in a cross-sectional study of 12,055 railway workers.

Authors:  Arve Lie; Marit Skogstad; Torstein Seip Johnsen; Bo Engdahl; Kristian Tambs
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2015 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

6.  Influence of Acoustic Overstimulation on the Central Auditory System: An Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) Study.

Authors:  Tomasz Wolak; Katarzyna Cieśla; Mateusz Rusiniak; Adam Piłka; Monika Lewandowska; Agnieszka Pluta; Henryk Skarżyński; Piotr H Skarżyński
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2016-11-28

7.  Prevalence of Hazardous Occupational Noise Exposure, Hearing Loss, and Hearing Protection Usage Among a Representative Sample of Working Canadians.

Authors:  Katya Feder; David Michaud; James McNamee; Elizabeth Fitzpatrick; Hugh Davies; Tony Leroux
Journal:  J Occup Environ Med       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 2.162

8.  Non-flat audiograms in sensorineural hearing loss and speech perception.

Authors:  Kelly Cristina Lira de Andrade; Pedro de Lemos Menezes; Aline Tenório Lins Carnaúba; Renato Glauco de Sousa Rodrigues; Mariana de Carvalho Leal; Liliane Desgualdo Pereira
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 2.365

9.  Occupational noise exposure, hearing loss, and notched audiograms in the HUNT Nord-Trøndelag hearing loss study, 1996-1998.

Authors:  Arve Lie; Bo Engdahl; Howard J Hoffman; Chuan-Ming Li; Kristian Tambs
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2016-10-03       Impact factor: 3.325

10.  Analysis of Early Biomarkers Associated With Noise-Induced Hearing Loss Among Shipyard Workers.

Authors:  Zhuang Jiang; Jiping Wang; Yanmei Feng; Daoyuan Sun; Xunmiao Zhang; Haibo Shi; Jian Wang; Richard Salvi; Hui Wang; Shankai Yin
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2021-09-01
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.