Literature DB >> 22387455

The effects of prepulse inhibition timing on the startle reflex and reaction time.

Dana Maslovat1, Paul M Kennedy, Christopher J Forgaard, Romeo Chua, Ian M Franks.   

Abstract

A loud acoustic stimulus has been shown to provoke a reflexive startle response and accelerate simple reaction times. However, an auditory prepulse presented in advance of a startling stimulus can reduce the effect of the startling stimulus. The current study examined the effect of the timing of the prepulse on startle-induced reaction times and the startle reflex. The task was to perform a 30° arm extension movement in response to a visual "go" stimulus. On selected trials, an auditory prepulse (80dB) was presented either 100ms, 500ms or 1000ms prior to the "go" signal. In addition, an auditory startling stimulus (124dB) was presented in conjunction with the "go" signal on some trials. Our results indicated that an auditory prepulse presented 100ms, and to a lesser extent 500ms, significantly decreased the amplitude of the startle reflex; however, the reaction time acceleration associated with the startling acoustic stimulus (SAS) was unaffected. The differential effect of the prepulse on the startle reflex and reaction time acceleration confirm different neural pathways for these effects while the differential effect of the prepulse on the control and startle RTs suggest different mechanisms for movement initiation.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22387455     DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2012.02.052

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosci Lett        ISSN: 0304-3940            Impact factor:   3.046


  14 in total

1.  Cortical involvement in the StartReact effect.

Authors:  A J T Stevenson; C Chiu; D Maslovat; R Chua; B Gick; J-S Blouin; I M Franks
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2014-03-28       Impact factor: 3.590

2.  Evidence for reticulospinal contributions to coordinated finger movements in humans.

Authors:  Claire Fletcher Honeycutt; Michael Kharouta; Eric Jon Perreault
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-07-03       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Corticospinal modulation induced by sounds depends on action preparedness.

Authors:  Welber Marinovic; James R Tresilian; Aymar de Rugy; Simranjit Sidhu; Stephan Riek
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2013-09-30       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Responses to startling acoustic stimuli indicate that movement-related activation does not build up in anticipation of action.

Authors:  Dana Maslovat; Ian M Franks; Anthony N Carlsen
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-05-01       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Reply to Maslovat et al.

Authors:  Welber Marinovic; Aymar de Rugy; Ottmar V Lipp; James R Tresilian
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-05-01       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Go-activation endures following the presentation of a stop-signal: evidence from startle.

Authors:  Neil M Drummond; Erin K Cressman; Anthony N Carlsen
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-11-02       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Foreknowledge of an impending startling stimulus does not affect the proportion of startle reflexes or latency of StartReact responses.

Authors:  Neil M Drummond; Alexandra Leguerrier; Anthony N Carlsen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-10-13       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Deficits in startle-evoked arm movements increase with impairment following stroke.

Authors:  Claire Fletcher Honeycutt; Eric Jon Perreault
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-12-30       Impact factor: 3.708

9.  Mechanical perturbations can elicit triggered reactions in the absence of a startle response.

Authors:  Christopher J Forgaard; Ian M Franks; Kimberly Bennett; Dana Maslovat; Romeo Chua
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-11-18       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  StartReact effects are dependent on engagement of startle reflex circuits: support for a subcortically mediated initiation pathway.

Authors:  Victoria Smith; Dana Maslovat; Anthony N Carlsen
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-10-23       Impact factor: 2.714

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.