Literature DB >> 22387261

An accurate skull stripping method based on simplex meshes and histogram analysis for magnetic resonance images.

Francisco J Galdames1, Fabrice Jaillet, Claudio A Perez.   

Abstract

Skull stripping methods are designed to eliminate the non-brain tissue in magnetic resonance (MR) brain images. Removal of non-brain tissues is a fundamental step in enabling the processing of brain MR images. The aim of this study is to develop an automatic accurate skull stripping method based on deformable models and histogram analysis. A rough-segmentation step is used to find the optimal starting point for the deformation and is based on thresholds and morphological operators. Thresholds are computed using comparisons with an atlas, and modeling by Gaussians. The deformable model is based on a simplex mesh and its deformation is controlled by the image local gray levels and the information obtained on the gray level modeling of the rough-segmentation. Our Simplex Mesh and Histogram Analysis Skull Stripping (SMHASS) method was tested on the following international databases commonly used in scientific articles: BrainWeb, Internet Brain Segmentation Repository (IBSR), and Segmentation Validation Engine (SVE). A comparison was performed against three of the best skull stripping methods previously published: Brain Extraction Tool (BET), Brain Surface Extractor (BSE), and Hybrid Watershed Algorithm (HWA). Performance was measured using the Jaccard index (J) and Dice coefficient (κ). Our method showed the best performance and differences were statistically significant (p<0.05): J=0.904 and κ=0.950 on BrainWeb; J=0.905 and κ=0.950 on IBSR; J=0.946 and κ=0.972 on SVE.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22387261     DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2012.02.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci Methods        ISSN: 0165-0270            Impact factor:   2.390


  13 in total

1.  Comparative performance evaluation of automated segmentation methods of hippocampus from magnetic resonance images of temporal lobe epilepsy patients.

Authors:  Mohammad-Parsa Hosseini; Mohammad-Reza Nazem-Zadeh; Dario Pompili; Kourosh Jafari-Khouzani; Kost Elisevich; Hamid Soltanian-Zadeh
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 2.  Methods on Skull Stripping of MRI Head Scan Images-a Review.

Authors:  P Kalavathi; V B Surya Prasath
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 4.056

3.  Robust Skull-Stripping Segmentation Based on Irrational Mask for Magnetic Resonance Brain Images.

Authors:  Simona Moldovanu; Luminița Moraru; Anjan Biswas
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 4.056

4.  State-of-the-Art Traditional to the Machine- and Deep-Learning-Based Skull Stripping Techniques, Models, and Algorithms.

Authors:  Anam Fatima; Ahmad Raza Shahid; Basit Raza; Tahir Mustafa Madni; Uzair Iqbal Janjua
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 4.056

5.  Field of View Normalization in Multi-Site Brain MRI.

Authors:  Yangming Ou; Lilla Zöllei; Xiao Da; Kallirroi Retzepi; Shawn N Murphy; Elizabeth R Gerstner; Bruce R Rosen; P Ellen Grant; Jayashree Kalpathy-Cramer; Randy L Gollub
Journal:  Neuroinformatics       Date:  2018-10

6.  Robust skull stripping using multiple MR image contrasts insensitive to pathology.

Authors:  Snehashis Roy; John A Butman; Dzung L Pham
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2016-11-15       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  Magnetic resonance image tissue classification using an automatic method.

Authors:  Sepideh Yazdani; Rubiyah Yusof; Amirhosein Riazi; Alireza Karimian
Journal:  Diagn Pathol       Date:  2014-12-24       Impact factor: 2.644

8.  Brain extraction in pediatric ADC maps, toward characterizing neuro-development in multi-platform and multi-institution clinical images.

Authors:  Yangming Ou; Randy L Gollub; Kallirroi Retzepi; Nathaniel Reynolds; Rudolph Pienaar; Steve Pieper; Shawn N Murphy; P Ellen Grant; Lilla Zöllei
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2015-08-07       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  Quantification of global cerebral atrophy in multiple sclerosis from 3T MRI using SPM: the role of misclassification errors.

Authors:  Elisa Dell'Oglio; Antonia Ceccarelli; Bonnie I Glanz; Brian C Healy; Shahamat Tauhid; Ashish Arora; Nikila Saravanan; Matthew J Bruha; Alexander V Vartanian; Sheena L Dupuy; Ralph H B Benedict; Rohit Bakshi; Mohit Neema
Journal:  J Neuroimaging       Date:  2014-12-18       Impact factor: 2.486

10.  The benefits of skull stripping in the normalization of clinical fMRI data.

Authors:  F Ph S Fischmeister; I Höllinger; N Klinger; A Geissler; M C Wurnig; E Matt; J Rath; S D Robinson; S Trattnig; R Beisteiner
Journal:  Neuroimage Clin       Date:  2013-09-30       Impact factor: 4.881

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.