| Literature DB >> 22385640 |
Brett A Simms1, Gerald W Zamponi.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: A loss of function of the L-type calcium channel, Cav1.2, results in a cardiac specific disease known as Brugada syndrome. Although many Brugada syndrome channelopathies reduce channel function, one point mutation in the N-terminus of Cav1.2 (A39V) has been shown to elicit disease a phenotype because of a loss of surface trafficking of the channel. This lack of cell membrane expression could not be rescued by the trafficking chaperone Cavβ.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22385640 PMCID: PMC3307476 DOI: 10.1186/1756-6606-5-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mol Brain ISSN: 1756-6606 Impact factor: 4.041
Figure 1Surface trafficking and total expression are the same for A39V-Cav1.2-HA and WT-Cav1.2-HA in the presence of β2b. (A). β2b significantly increases the surface trafficking of A39V-Cav1.2-HA and WT-Cav1.2-HA in nonpermeablized tsA-201 cells. (B). Quantification of HA surface pool displayed as fluorescence per cell (arbitrary light units). β2b and β1b (Additional file 2: Figure S2A) significantly increase the fluorescence per cell of WT-Cav1.2-HA, while only β2b significantly increased the surface fluorescence of A39V-Cav1.2-HA (*p = < 0.05 and #p = < 0.05 by one-way ANOVA). Cavβ1b does not significantly increase the fluorescence per cell of A39V-Cav1.2 (p = > 0.05 by one-way ANOVA). (C). Total protein expression of A39V-Cav1.2-HA and WT-Cav1.2-HA from tsA-201 cell lysates expressed with and without β2b. (D). Quantification of A39V-Cav1.2-HA and WT-Cav1.2-HA total expression (integrated density units) with and without β2b/β1b (Additional file 2: Figure S2B). The data is expressed as a ratio of HA/α-actin. Both β2b and β1b significantly increase the expression of A39V-Cav1.2 (*p = < 0.05 by one-way ANOVA). A39V-Cav1.2 shows less expression than WT-Cav1.2 in the absence of Cavβ (#p = 0.04 student's t-test).
Figure 2The current voltage relation and steady-state inactivation of A39V-Cav1.2 is not significantly different from WT-Cav1.2 in the presence of β2b or β1b. (A). The current-voltage relationships of WT and A39V-Cav1.2 with and without β2b. There is no significant difference in current density, or voltage-dependent properties when comparing WT-Cav1.2 (grey) and A39V-Cav1.2 (light green); or WT-Cav1.2 (black) and A39V-Cav1.2 (dark green) with Cavβ2b. Cavβ2b does significantly increase the current density of both WT and A39V-Cav1.2 (p = < 0.05 by one-way ANOVA). β1b also significantly increased current density of A39V-Cav1.2 (p = < 0.05 by one-way ANOVA) (Additional file 2: Figure S2). (B). Steady-state inactivation plots of WT and A39V-Cav1.2 with and without β2b. There is no significant difference in the steady-state of inactivation between WT-Cav1.2 and A39V-Cav1.2 in the presence of β2b or β1b (Additional file 2: Figure S2). The slope of steady state inactivation is increased for A39V-Cav1.2 when compared to WT-Cav1.2 in the absence of the Cavβ subunit (see Table 1) which significantly reduces the percentage of channels available at marked voltages (*) when compared to WT (p = < 0.05 by students t-test). (C) Voltage clamp protocol for inactivation curves, and sample traces of WT-Cav1.2 and A39V-Cav1.2 with Cavβ2b. Normalized traces of WT-Cav1.2 (black) and A39V-Cav1.2 (dark green) with Cavβ2b illustrating no significant difference in the time course of inactivation. Currents were evoked from a holding potential of -100 mV to various 4.5 s long conditioning potentials (ranging from -60 mV through +60 mV in 10 mV increments), followed by a test pulse to +10 mV for 0.5 sec.
Current densities and voltage-dependent properties of A39V-Cav1.2 without Cavβ, with Cavβ2b, or with Cavβ1b
| Current Density (pA/pF) | V1/2 Activation (mV) | Slope of Activation (mV) | V1/2 Steady State Inactivation (mV) | Slope of Steady State Inactivation (mV) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cav1.2 + Cavα2δ | -4.4 +/- 0.5 | -9.1 +/- 1.3 | 4.7 +/- 0.7 | -5.4 +/-1.8 | 6.9 +/- 0.6# |
| A39V-Cav.2 + Cavα2δ | -3.3 +/- 0.5 | -11.7 +/- 1.5 | 4.6 +/- 0.9 | -7.3 +/- 1.9 | 11.8 +/- 1.4# |
| Cav1.2 + α2δ + Cavβ2b | -9.1 +/- 1.4 * | -3.8 +/- 0.8 | 10.2 +/- 1.4 | -7.1 +/- 1.7 | 11.1 +/- 1.8 |
| A39V-Cav1.2 + Cavα2δ + Cavβ2b | -9.5 +/- 1.3 ** | -3.0 +/- 1.4 | 13.0 +/- 2.0 | -5.2 +/- 2.8 | 11.5 +/- 1.2 |
| Cav1.2 + Cavα2δ + Cavβ1b | -10.6 +/- 1.1 * | -9.0 +/- 0.8 | 8.8 +/- 1.2 | -6.3 +/- 1.1 | 8.4 +/- 1.2 |
| A39V-Cav1.2 + Cavα2δ + Cavβ1b | -8.3 +/- 1.0 ** | -6.4 +/- 1.1 | 8.1 +/- 0.9 | -6.8 +/- 1.6 | 9.3 +/- 0.8 |
- * indicates significant increase in current density when compared to Cav1.2 without a Cavβ subunit; p = < 0.05, ANOVA
- ** indicates significant increase in current density when compared to A39V-Cav1.2 without a Cavβ subunit; p = < 0.05, ANOVA
- Data expressed as mean +/- SEM. Current density was determined from a minimum of 24 cells per condition, from three separate transfections. All other values determined from aforementioned cells which fit the modified Boltzmann, or Boltzmann equations (> 11 cells/per condition)
- # indicates significant difference in slope of steady state inactivation; p = > 0.01, Students T-test