Literature DB >> 22385513

DNA damage response pathways and cell cycle checkpoints in colorectal cancer: current concepts and future perspectives for targeted treatment.

S Solier1, Y-W Zhang, A Ballestrero, Y Pommier, G Zoppoli.   

Abstract

Although several drugs have been designed in the last few years to target specific key pathways and functions in colorectal cancer (CRC), the backbone of CRC treatment is still made up of compounds which rely on DNA damage to accomplish their role. DNA damage response (DDR) and checkpoint pathways are intertwined signaling networks that arrest cell cycle, recognize and repair genetic mistakes which arise during DNA replication and transcription, as well as through the exposure to chemical and physical agents that interact with nucleic acids. The good but highly variable activity of DNA damaging agents in the treatment of CRC suggests that intrinsic alterations in DDR pathways and cell cycle checkpoints may contribute differentially to the way cancer cells react to DNA damage. In the present review, our aim is to depict the recent advances in understanding the molecular basis of the activity of DNA damaging agents used for the treatment of CRC. We focus on the known and potential drug targets that are part of these complex and intertwined pathways. We describe the potential role of the checkpoints in CRC, and how their pharmacological manipulation could lead to chemopotentiation or synergism with currently used drugs. Novel therapeutic agents playing a role in DDR and checkpoint inhibition are assessed. We discuss the possible rationale for combining PARP inhibition with DNA damaging agents, and we address the link between DDR and EGFR pathways in CRC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22385513      PMCID: PMC7458274          DOI: 10.2174/156800912800190901

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Cancer Drug Targets        ISSN: 1568-0096            Impact factor:   3.428


  196 in total

Review 1.  Chromosomal instability, colorectal cancer and taxane resistance.

Authors:  Charles Swanton; Ian Tomlinson; Julian Downward
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2006-04-17       Impact factor: 4.534

Review 2.  PARP inhibition: PARP1 and beyond.

Authors:  Michèle Rouleau; Anand Patel; Michael J Hendzel; Scott H Kaufmann; Guy G Poirier
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2010-03-04       Impact factor: 60.716

3.  Heterozygous germ line hCHK2 mutations in Li-Fraumeni syndrome.

Authors:  D W Bell; J M Varley; T E Szydlo; D H Kang; D C Wahrer; K E Shannon; M Lubratovich; S J Verselis; K J Isselbacher; J F Fraumeni; J M Birch; F P Li; J E Garber; D A Haber
Journal:  Science       Date:  1999-12-24       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Prognostic impact of p21/waf1/cip1 in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  T K Zirbes; S E Baldus; S P Moenig; S Nolden; D Kunze; S T Shafizadeh; P M Schneider; J Thiele; A H Hoelscher; H P Dienes
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2000-01-20       Impact factor: 7.396

5.  Cells with pathogenic biallelic mutations in the human MUTYH gene are defective in DNA damage binding and repair.

Authors:  Antony R Parker; Oliver M Sieber; Chanjuan Shi; Li Hua; Masashi Takao; Ian P Tomlinson; James R Eshleman
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2005-06-29       Impact factor: 4.944

6.  Protein kinase CK2 is involved in G2 arrest and apoptosis following spindle damage in epithelial cells.

Authors:  M Sayed; S Pelech; C Wong; A Marotta; B Salh
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2001-10-25       Impact factor: 9.867

Review 7.  Kinases that control the cell cycle in response to DNA damage: Chk1, Chk2, and MK2.

Authors:  H Christian Reinhardt; Michael B Yaffe
Journal:  Curr Opin Cell Biol       Date:  2009-02-21       Impact factor: 8.382

Review 8.  Targeting chk2 kinase: molecular interaction maps and therapeutic rationale.

Authors:  Yves Pommier; Olivier Sordet; V Ashutosh Rao; Hongliang Zhang; Kurt W Kohn
Journal:  Curr Pharm Des       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 3.116

9.  Phase III noninferiority trial comparing irinotecan with oxaliplatin, fluorouracil, and leucovorin in patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma previously treated with fluorouracil: N9841.

Authors:  George P Kim; Daniel J Sargent; Michelle R Mahoney; Kendrith M Rowland; Philip A Philip; Edith Mitchell; Abraham P Mathews; Tom R Fitch; Richard M Goldberg; Steven R Alberts; Henry C Pitot
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-04-20       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Cellular inhibition of checkpoint kinase 2 (Chk2) and potentiation of camptothecins and radiation by the novel Chk2 inhibitor PV1019 [7-nitro-1H-indole-2-carboxylic acid {4-[1-(guanidinohydrazone)-ethyl]-phenyl}-amide].

Authors:  Andrew G Jobson; George T Lountos; Philip L Lorenzi; Jenny Llamas; John Connelly; David Cerna; Joseph E Tropea; Akikazu Onda; Gabriele Zoppoli; Sudhir Kondapaka; Guangtao Zhang; Natasha J Caplen; John H Cardellina; Stephen S Yoo; Anne Monks; Christopher Self; David S Waugh; Robert H Shoemaker; Yves Pommier
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  2009-09-09       Impact factor: 4.030

View more
  12 in total

1.  Pharmaceutical differences between block copolymer self-assembled and cross-linked nanoassemblies as carriers for tunable drug release.

Authors:  Hyun Jin Lee; Younsoo Bae
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2012-10-09       Impact factor: 4.200

Review 2.  Potential biomarkers associated with oxidative stress for risk assessment of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Paramita Mandal
Journal:  Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol       Date:  2017-02-22       Impact factor: 3.000

3.  Terfenadine induces anti-proliferative and apoptotic activities in human hormone-refractory prostate cancer through histamine receptor-independent Mcl-1 cleavage and Bak up-regulation.

Authors:  Wei-Ting Wang; Yen-Hui Chen; Jui-Ling Hsu; Wohn-Jenn Leu; Chia-Chun Yu; She-Hung Chan; Yunn-Fang Ho; Lih-Ching Hsu; Jih-Hwa Guh
Journal:  Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol       Date:  2013-09-19       Impact factor: 3.000

4.  On biomarkers and pathways in rectal cancer: What's the target?

Authors:  Gabriele Zoppoli; Valter Ferrando; Stefano Scabini
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2012-12-27

5.  How does inflammation drive mutagenesis in colorectal cancer?

Authors:  Chia Wei Hsu; Mark L Sowers; Willie Hsu; Eduardo Eyzaguirre; Suimin Qiu; Celia Chao; Charles P Mouton; Yuri Fofanov; Pomila Singh; Lawrence C Sowers
Journal:  Trends Cancer Res       Date:  2017

6.  OSU-CG5, a novel energy restriction mimetic agent, targets human colorectal cancer cells in vitro.

Authors:  El-shaimaa A Arafa; Ahmed H Abdelazeem; Hany H Arab; Hany A Omar
Journal:  Acta Pharmacol Sin       Date:  2014-01-27       Impact factor: 6.150

7.  Metabolomics of ApcMin/+ mice genetically susceptible to intestinal cancer.

Authors:  Jean-Eudes J Dazard; Yana Sandlers; Stephanie K Doerner; Nathan A Berger; Henri Brunengraber
Journal:  BMC Syst Biol       Date:  2014-06-23

8.  Clinical significance and association of RUNX3 hypermethylation frequency with colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Wei-Ping Mu; Jian Wang; Qiong Niu; Ning Shi; Hai-Feng Lian
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2014-07-10       Impact factor: 4.147

9.  Effect of APE1 T2197G (Asp148Glu) polymorphism on APE1, XRCC1, PARP1 and OGG1 expression in patients with colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Juliana C Santos; Alexandre Funck; Isabelle J L Silva-Fernandes; Silvia H B Rabenhorst; Carlos A R Martinez; Marcelo L Ribeiro
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2014-09-29       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 10.  Multi-Gene Testing Overview with a Clinical Perspective in Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Martina Dameri; Lorenzo Ferrando; Gabriella Cirmena; Claudio Vernieri; Giancarlo Pruneri; Alberto Ballestrero; Gabriele Zoppoli
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 5.923

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.