Literature DB >> 22384647

Evaluation of surgically induced astigmatism after coaxial phacoemulsification through 1.8 mm microincision and standard phacoemulsification through 2.75 mm incision.

Michal Wilczynski1, Ewa Supady, Piotr Loba, Aleksandra Synder, Dorota Palenga-Pydyn, Wojciech Omulecki.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Improvements in technology connected with cataract surgery have made it possible to decrease significantly the size of corneal incision created during phacoemulsification. Recently, coaxial phacoemulsification through a 1.8 mm microincision (C-MICS) has been introduced. This technique is perceived as the next step in development of phacoemulsification.
PURPOSE: To compare surgically induced astigmatism (SIA) after coaxial 1.8 mm microincision cataract surgery (C-MICS) and standard phacoemulsification through 2.75 mm incision, calculated with three mathematical methods.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: A consecutive, prospective series of 55 eyes of 55 patients who underwent uneventful C-MICS with foldable IOL implantation using 1.8 mm temporal clear corneal incision were included in group 1. Reference group (group 2) included 55 eyes of 55 patients who underwent uneventful phacoemulsification through 2.75 mm temporal clear corneal incision with a foldable IOL implantation. SIA was calculated using three methods.
RESULTS: All patients had uneventful surgery and were examined before the surgery and one month postoperatively. There was a significant postoperative increase in corrected distance visual acuity in both groups (p < 0.01), and the visual outcomes in both groups were similar (p > 0.05). In vector analysis, mean SIA was 0.42 +/- 0.30 in group 1 and 0.77 +/- 0.55 in group 2. In vector decomposition, the mean SIA (C90) in group 1 was 0.24 +/- 0.29 and 0.49 +/- 0.54 in group 2 (p < 0.05). In Naeser's polar values method, deltaKP-0 was -0.06 +/- 0.43 in group 1 and -0.21 +/- 0.84 in group 2 (p > 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: 1.8 mm coaxial MICS induces a significantly smaller value of SIA than standard 2.75 mm phacoemulsification.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22384647

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Klin Oczna        ISSN: 0023-2157


  6 in total

1.  Early clinical outcome with a new monofocal microincision intraocular lens.

Authors:  Baha Toygar; Ozge Yabas Kiziloglu; Okan Toygar; Ali Murat Hacimustafaoglu
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-01-16       Impact factor: 2.031

2.  Scanning electron microscopy study of different one-piece foldable acrylic intraocular lenses after injection through microincisional cataract surgery cartridges.

Authors:  Paolo Cecchini; Rossella D'Aloisio; Chiara De Giacinto; Gianluca Turco; Daniele Tognetto
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-10-17       Impact factor: 2.031

3.  Long-Term Visual Quality after Microincision Cataract Surgery.

Authors:  Qing Huang; Ruili Li; Liwen Feng; Na Miao; Wei Fan
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-09-15       Impact factor: 1.909

4.  Outcomes of Phacoemulsification Using Different Size of Clear Corneal Incision in Eyes with Previous Radial Keratotomy.

Authors:  Jing Shang Zhang; Xue Liu; Jin Da Wang; Ying Xiong; Jing Li; Xiao Xia Li; Jing Zhao; Qi Sheng You; Yao Huang; Frank Tsai; Larry Baum; Vishal Jhanji; Xiu Hua Wan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-12-19       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Coaxial Microincision Cataract Surgery versus Standard Coaxial Small-Incision Cataract Surgery: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Authors:  Xingchao Shentu; Xin Zhang; Xiajing Tang; Xiaoning Yu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-01-08       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Comparison of visual outcomes after implantation of AtLisa tri 839 MP and Symfony intraocular lenses.

Authors:  Wojciech Lubiński; Karolina Podborączyńska-Jodko; Marta Kirkiewicz; Maciej Mularczyk; Michał Post
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-06-02       Impact factor: 2.031

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.