Literature DB >> 22381194

Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging to physical examination for syndesmotic injury after lateral ankle sprain.

Paulo Céesar de César1, Eduardo Muller Avila, Marcelo Rodrigues de Abreu.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Clinical assessment of syndesmotic injury usually consists of two tests: the ankle external rotation test and squeeze test. This study sought to determine the sensitivity and specificity of both for syndesmotic injury secondary to lateral ankle sprain.
METHODS: Fifty-six patients with sprained ankles underwent clinical examination for syndesmotic injury with the aforementioned tests. Clinical findings were compared against magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the ankle. Sprains were graded on anatomical and functional classification scales, and correlation and agreement between both scales were assessed.
RESULTS: The MRI prevalence of syndesmotic injury in patients with lateral ankle sprains was 17.8%. Sensitivity and specificity were 30% and 93.5% for the squeeze test, and 20% and 84.8% for the external rotation test, respectively. Using the anatomical scale for sprain grading, 40% of syndesmotic injuries occurred in Grade I, 40% in Grade II, and 20% in Grade III sprains. Ten percent of patients with syndesmotic injury had no lateral ligament injury on MRI, 70% had injury of the anterior talofibular (ATFL) ligament, and 20% had injury to the ATFL and calcaneofibular (CFL).
CONCLUSION: The sensitivity of the squeeze test and external rotation test was low, suggesting that physical examination often fails to diagnose syndesmotic injury. Conversely, specificity was very high; nearly all patients with a positive test actually had syndesmotic injury. Severity of ankle sprain was not associated with prevalence of syndesmotic injury.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22381194     DOI: 10.3113/FAI.2011.1110

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Foot Ankle Int        ISSN: 1071-1007            Impact factor:   2.827


  21 in total

1.  Magnetic resonance imaging characterization of individual ankle syndesmosis structures in asymptomatic and surgically treated cohorts.

Authors:  Thomas O Clanton; Charles P Ho; Brady T Williams; Rachel K Surowiec; Coley C Gatlin; C Thomas Haytmanek; Robert F LaPrade
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-11-15       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Diagnostic accuracy of physical examination tests of the ankle/foot complex: a systematic review.

Authors:  Braun Schwieterman; Deniele Haas; Kirby Columber; Darren Knupp; Chad Cook
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2013-08

Review 3.  An update on the evaluation and treatment of syndesmotic injuries.

Authors:  S Rammelt; P Obruba
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2014-11-12       Impact factor: 3.693

Review 4.  Syndesmosis and deltoid ligament injuries in the athlete.

Authors:  Graham A McCollum; Michel P J van den Bekerom; Gino M M J Kerkhoffs; James D F Calder; C Niek van Dijk
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-10-07       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Robust Longitudinal Ankle Edema Assessment Using Wearable Bioimpedance Spectroscopy.

Authors:  Samer Mabrouk; Sinan Hersek; Hyeon Ki Jeong; Daniel Whittingslow; Venu G Ganti; Paul Wolkoff; Omer T Inan
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2019-07-10       Impact factor: 4.538

Review 6.  Musculoskeletal conditions of the foot and ankle: assessments and treatment options.

Authors:  Smita Rao; Jody L Riskowski; Marian T Hannan
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 4.098

Review 7.  Classification and diagnosis of acute isolated syndesmotic injuries: ESSKA-AFAS consensus and guidelines.

Authors:  C Niek van Dijk; Umile Giuseppe Longo; Mattia Loppini; Pino Florio; Ludovica Maltese; Mauro Ciuffreda; Vincenzo Denaro
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-12-24       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Cross-cultural adaptation, validity, and reliability of Turkish version of Identification of Functional Ankle Instability (IdFAI) scale.

Authors:  Abdulhamit Tayfur; Ateş Şendil; Jale Karakaya; Nevin Ergun
Journal:  Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 1.511

9.  Syndesmosis injuries of the ankle.

Authors:  Angelo Del Buono; Antonietta Florio; Michele Simone Boccanera; Nicola Maffulli
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2013-12

10.  Syndesmosis injuries.

Authors:  Kenneth J Hunt
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2013-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.