Literature DB >> 22378168

Sensitivity of EMG-EMG coherence to detect the common oscillatory drive to hand muscles in young and older adults.

Kevin G Keenan1, William V Massey, Tygh J Walters, Joseph D Collins.   

Abstract

Multichannel surface electromyograms (EMGs) were used to examine the sensitivity of EMG-EMG coherence to infer changes in common oscillatory drive to hand muscles in young and older adults. Previous research has shown that measures of coherence calculated from different neurophysiological signals are influenced by the age of the subject, the visual feedback provided to the subject, and the task being performed. The change in the magnitude of EMG-EMG coherence across experimental conditions is often interpreted as a change in the oscillatory drive to motoneuron pools of a pair of muscles. However, signal processing (e.g., full-wave rectification) and electrode location are also reported to influence EMG-EMG coherence, which could decrease the sensitivity of EMG-EMG coherence to infer a change in common oscillatory drive to motoneurons. In this study, multichannel EMGs were used to compare EMG-EMG coherence in young (n = 11) and older (n = 10) adults during index finger abduction and pinch grip tasks performed at 2 and 3.5 N with a low and a high visual feedback gain. We found that, across all conditions, EMG-EMG coherence was influenced by electrode location (P < 0.001) but not by subject age, visual feedback gain, task, or signal processing. These results suggest that EMG-EMG coherence is most sensitive to electrode location. The results are discussed in terms of the potential issues related to inferring a common oscillatory drive to hand muscles with surface EMGs.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22378168     DOI: 10.1152/jn.01011.2011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  13 in total

1.  Proximal arm kinematics affect grip force-load force coordination.

Authors:  Billy C Vermillion; Peter S Lum; Sang Wook Lee
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-08-19       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Spatial variability in cortex-muscle coherence investigated with magnetoencephalography and high-density surface electromyography.

Authors:  Harri Piitulainen; Alberto Botter; Mathieu Bourguignon; Veikko Jousmäki; Riitta Hari
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-09-09       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Identification of common synaptic inputs to motor neurons from the rectified electromyogram.

Authors:  Dario Farina; Francesco Negro; Ning Jiang
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2013-03-18       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  The effective neural drive to muscles is the common synaptic input to motor neurons.

Authors:  Dario Farina; Francesco Negro; Jakob Lund Dideriksen
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2014-05-23       Impact factor: 5.182

5.  Force fluctuations while pressing and moving against high- and low-friction touch screen surfaces.

Authors:  Mukta N Joshi; Kevin G Keenan
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-02-22       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  A critical period of corticomuscular and EMG-EMG coherence detection in healthy infants aged 9-25 weeks.

Authors:  Anina Ritterband-Rosenbaum; Anna Herskind; Xi Li; Maria Willerslev-Olsen; Mikkel Damgaard Olsen; Simon Francis Farmer; Jens Bo Nielsen
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2017-02-15       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  Across-muscle coherence is modulated as a function of wrist posture during two-digit grasping.

Authors:  Mark Jesunathadas; Juan Laitano; Thomas M Hamm; Marco Santello
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2013-08-16       Impact factor: 3.046

8.  Beta Band Corticomuscular Drive Reflects Muscle Coordination Strategies.

Authors:  Alexander Reyes; Christopher M Laine; Jason J Kutch; Francisco J Valero-Cuevas
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2017-04-04       Impact factor: 2.380

9.  EEG hyperscanning in motor rehabilitation: a position paper.

Authors:  Matthew R Short; Julio C Hernandez-Pavon; Alyssa Jones; Jose L Pons
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2021-06-10       Impact factor: 4.262

10.  Control of fingertip forces in young and older adults pressing against fixed low- and high-friction surfaces.

Authors:  Kevin G Keenan; William V Massey
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-10-24       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.