Literature DB >> 22374550

Malignant induction probability maps for radiotherapy using X-ray and proton beams.

C Timlin1, M Houston, B Jones.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to display malignant induction probability (MIP) maps alongside dose distribution maps for radiotherapy using X-ray and charged particles such as protons. Dose distributions for X-rays and protons are used in an interactive MATLAB® program (MathWorks, Natick, MA). The MIP is calculated using a published linear quadratic model, which incorporates fractionation effects, cell killing and cancer induction as a function of dose, as well as relative biological effect. Two virtual situations are modelled: (a) a tumour placed centrally in a cubic volume of normal tissue and (b) the same tumour placed closer to the skin surface. The MIP is calculated for a variety of treatment field options. The results show that, for protons, the MIP increases with field numbers. In such cases, proton MIP can be higher than that for X-rays. Protons produce the lowest MIPs for superficial targets because of the lack of exit dose. The addition of a dose bath to all normal tissues increases the MIP by up to an order of magnitude. This exploratory study shows that it is possible to achieve three-dimensional displays of carcinogenesis risk. The importance of treatment geometry, including the length and volume of tissue traversed by each beam, can all influence MIP. Reducing the volume of tissue irradiated is advantageous, as reducing the number of cells at risk reduces the total MIP. This finding lends further support to the use of treatment gantries as well as the use of simpler field arrangements for particle therapy provided normal tissue tolerances are respected.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22374550      PMCID: PMC3473888          DOI: 10.1259/bjr/70190973

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN: 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.039


  11 in total

1.  Comparative treatment planning using secondary cancer mortality calculations.

Authors:  U Schneider; A Lomax; N Lombriser
Journal:  Phys Med       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 2.685

2.  The incorporation of the concept of minimum RBE (RbEmin) into the linear-quadratic model and the potential for improved radiobiological analysis of high-LET treatments.

Authors:  Alejandro Carabe-Fernandez; Roger G Dale; Bleddyn Jones
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 2.694

3.  Dose-response relationship for induction of solid tumors in female B6C3F1 mice irradiated neonatally with a single dose of gamma rays.

Authors:  S Sasaki; N Fukuda
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 2.724

4.  Secondary carcinogenesis in patients treated with radiation: a review of data on radiation-induced cancers in human, non-human primate, canine and rodent subjects.

Authors:  Herman Suit; Saveli Goldberg; Andrzej Niemierko; Marek Ancukiewicz; Eric Hall; Michael Goitein; Winifred Wong; Harald Paganetti
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 2.841

5.  Transformation of mammalian cells in vitro by low doses of X-rays.

Authors:  C Borek; E J Hall
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1973-06-22       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  The use of risk estimation models for the induction of secondary cancers following radiotherapy.

Authors:  Alexandru Daşu; Iuliana Toma-Daşu; Jörgen Olofsson; Mikael Karlsson
Journal:  Acta Oncol       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 4.089

Review 7.  Intensity-modulated radiation therapy, protons, and the risk of second cancers.

Authors:  Eric J Hall
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2006-05-01       Impact factor: 7.038

8.  The effect of intensity-modulated radiotherapy on radiation-induced second malignancies.

Authors:  Jeremy D Ruben; Sidney Davis; Cherie Evans; Phillip Jones; Frank Gagliardi; Matthew Haynes; Alistair Hunter
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2008-01-22       Impact factor: 7.038

9.  Second cancers after fractionated radiotherapy: stochastic population dynamics effects.

Authors:  Rainer K Sachs; Igor Shuryak; David Brenner; Hatim Fakir; Lynn Hlatky; Philip Hahnfeldt
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2007-08-12       Impact factor: 2.691

Review 10.  Modelling carcinogenesis after radiotherapy using Poisson statistics: implications for IMRT, protons and ions.

Authors:  Bleddyn Jones
Journal:  J Radiol Prot       Date:  2009-05-19       Impact factor: 1.394

View more
  2 in total

1.  Particle therapy.

Authors:  S Green
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Efficacy of dose escalation on TCP, recurrence and second cancer risks: a mathematical study.

Authors:  V S K Manem; A Dhawan; M Kohandel; S Sivaloganathan
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2014-09-11       Impact factor: 3.039

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.