Literature DB >> 17214511

Secondary carcinogenesis in patients treated with radiation: a review of data on radiation-induced cancers in human, non-human primate, canine and rodent subjects.

Herman Suit1, Saveli Goldberg, Andrzej Niemierko, Marek Ancukiewicz, Eric Hall, Michael Goitein, Winifred Wong, Harald Paganetti.   

Abstract

Concern for risk of radiation-induced cancer is growing with the increasing number of cancer patients surviving long term. This study examined data on radiation transformation of mammalian cells in vitro and on the risk of an increased cancer incidence after irradiation of mice, dogs, monkeys, atomic bomb survivors, occupationally exposed persons, and patients treated with radiation. Transformation of cells lines in vitro increased linearly with dose from approximately 1 to approximately 4-5 Gy. At <0.1 Gy, transformation was not increased in all studies. Dose-response relationships for cancer incidence varied with mouse strain, gender and tissue/organ. Risk of cancer in Macaca mulatta was not raised at 0.25-2.8 Gy. From the atomic bomb survivor study, risk is accepted as increasing linearly to 2 Sv for establishing exposure standards. In irradiated patients, risk of cancer increased significantly from 1 to 45 Gy (a low to a high dose level) for stomach and pancreas, but not for bladder and rectum (1-60 Gy) or kidney (1-15 Gy). Risk for several organs/tissues increased substantially at doses far above 2 Gy. There is great heterogeneity in risk of radiation-associated cancer between species, strains of a species, and organs within a species. At present, the heterogeneity between and within patient populations of virtually every parameter considered in risk estimation results in substantial uncertainty in quantification of a general risk factor. An implication of this review is that reduced risks of secondary cancer should be achieved by any technique that achieved a dose reduction down to approximately [corrected] 0.1 Gy, i.e. dose to tissues distant from the target. The proportionate gain should be greatest for dose decrement to less than 2 Gy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17214511     DOI: 10.1667/RR0527.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Res        ISSN: 0033-7587            Impact factor:   2.841


  58 in total

1.  Estimate of the uncertainties in the relative risk of secondary malignant neoplasms following proton therapy and intensity-modulated photon therapy.

Authors:  Jonas D Fontenot; Charles Bloch; David Followill; Uwe Titt; Wayne D Newhauser
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2010-11-12       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Second malignancies in high‑dose areas of previous tumor radiotherapy.

Authors:  Birgitta Welte; Peter Suhr; Dirk Bottke; Detlef Bartkowiak; Wolfgang Dörr; Klaus Rüdiger Trott; Thomas Wiegel
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2010-02-22       Impact factor: 3.621

3.  The linear no-threshold relationship is inconsistent with radiation biologic and experimental data.

Authors:  Maurice Tubiana; Ludwig E Feinendegen; Chichuan Yang; Joseph M Kaminski
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 4.  New challenges in high-energy particle radiobiology.

Authors:  M Durante
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  Model of accelerated carcinogenesis based on proliferative stress and inflammation for doses relevant to radiotherapy.

Authors:  Uwe Schneider; Brigitte Schäfer
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2012-08-17       Impact factor: 1.925

6.  Impact of previous radiotherapy for prostate cancer on clinical outcomes of patients with bladder cancer.

Authors:  David S Yee; Shahrokh F Shariat; William T Lowrance; Joseph R Sterbis; Kinjal C Vora; Bernard H Bochner; S Machele Donat; Harry W Herr; Guido Dalbagni; Jaspreet S Sandhu
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2010-03-17       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Secondary spindle cell sarcoma following external beam radiotherapy for prostate cancer: a rare but devastating complication.

Authors:  Matthew Farag; Anthony Ta; Siva Shankar; Lih-Ming Wong
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2018-07-11

8.  Assessment of uncertainties in radiation-induced cancer risk predictions at clinically relevant doses.

Authors:  J Nguyen; M Moteabbed; H Paganetti
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 9.  Assessment of the risk for developing a second malignancy from scattered and secondary radiation in radiation therapy.

Authors:  Harald Paganetti
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 1.316

10.  Incidence of bladder cancer after radiation for prostate cancer as a function of time and radiation modality.

Authors:  Aryeh Keehn; Ethan Ludmir; Jacob Taylor; Farhang Rabbani
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2016-09-14       Impact factor: 4.226

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.