BACKGROUND: Although lymph node-positive breast cancers are associated with poorer prognosis, individual patients may have different clinical outcomes. Signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3) is a point of convergence for numerous oncogenic signalling pathways. The goal of this study was to determine the prognostic value of phosphorylated (tyrosine705)-STAT3 in node-positive breast cancer patients. METHODS: Immunohistochemical analysis of Phospho- STAT3 was performed on a tissue microarray of breast cancer specimens. The expression pattern of Phospho-STAT3 was correlated with survival outcome, and clinical and pathological parameters. RESULTS: Out of 125 interpretable tumours, positive Phospho- STAT3 nuclear expression was seen in 35 (28%) of tumours. There was no significant relationship between Phospho-STAT3 expression and clinical-pathological parameters including age, hormonal receptor status, grade and tumour size. Interestingly positive tumours had a significantly improved disease-free survival at 5 years (p=0.035). Additionally, positive Phospho-STAT3 nuclear expression was correlated with significantly improved survival at both 5 years (p=0.023) and 10 years (p=0.026). Finally, in multivariate analyses Phospho-STAT3 was found to be an independent prognostic marker of overall survival in node-positive breast cancer patients. CONCLUSION: These findings support the role of Phospho- STAT3 as an important independent prognostic marker in node-positive breast cancer patients.
BACKGROUND: Although lymph node-positive breast cancers are associated with poorer prognosis, individual patients may have different clinical outcomes. Signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3) is a point of convergence for numerous oncogenic signalling pathways. The goal of this study was to determine the prognostic value of phosphorylated (tyrosine705)-STAT3 in node-positive breast cancerpatients. METHODS: Immunohistochemical analysis of Phospho- STAT3 was performed on a tissue microarray of breast cancer specimens. The expression pattern of Phospho-STAT3 was correlated with survival outcome, and clinical and pathological parameters. RESULTS: Out of 125 interpretable tumours, positive Phospho- STAT3 nuclear expression was seen in 35 (28%) of tumours. There was no significant relationship between Phospho-STAT3 expression and clinical-pathological parameters including age, hormonal receptor status, grade and tumour size. Interestingly positive tumours had a significantly improved disease-free survival at 5 years (p=0.035). Additionally, positive Phospho-STAT3 nuclear expression was correlated with significantly improved survival at both 5 years (p=0.023) and 10 years (p=0.026). Finally, in multivariate analyses Phospho-STAT3 was found to be an independent prognostic marker of overall survival in node-positive breast cancerpatients. CONCLUSION: These findings support the role of Phospho- STAT3 as an important independent prognostic marker in node-positive breast cancerpatients.
Authors: Pedro J Real; Angels Sierra; Ana De Juan; Jose C Segovia; Jose M Lopez-Vega; Jose L Fernandez-Luna Journal: Oncogene Date: 2002-10-31 Impact factor: 9.867
Authors: Isaia Barbieri; Sara Pensa; Tania Pannellini; Elena Quaglino; Diego Maritano; Marco Demaria; Alessandra Voster; James Turkson; Federica Cavallo; Christine J Watson; Paolo Provero; Piero Musiani; Valeria Poli Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2010-03-09 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: C M Perou; S S Jeffrey; M van de Rijn; C A Rees; M B Eisen; D T Ross; A Pergamenschikov; C F Williams; S X Zhu; J C Lee; D Lashkari; D Shalon; P O Brown; D Botstein Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 1999-08-03 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Kate D Sutherland; François Vaillant; Warren S Alexander; Tim M Wintermantel; Natasha C Forrest; Sheridan L Holroyd; Edward J McManus; Gunther Schutz; Christine J Watson; Lewis A Chodosh; Geoffrey J Lindeman; Jane E Visvader Journal: EMBO J Date: 2006-11-30 Impact factor: 11.598
Authors: Marisa Dolled-Filhart; Robert L Camp; Diane P Kowalski; Bradley L Smith; David L Rimm Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2003-02 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Amir Sonnenblick; Roberto Salgado; Sylvain Brohée; Tamar Zahavi; Tamar Peretz; Gert Van den Eynden; Ghizlane Rouas; Asher Salmon; Prudence A Francis; Angelo Di Leo; John P A Crown; Giuseppe Viale; Laura Daly; Bahar Javdan; Sho Fujisawa; Evandro De Azambuja; Ameye Lieveke; Martine J Piccart; Jacqueline F Bromberg; Christos Sotiriou Journal: Int J Oncol Date: 2017-11-27 Impact factor: 5.650
Authors: Qing Chang; Eirini Bournazou; Pasquale Sansone; Marjan Berishaj; Sizhi Paul Gao; Laura Daly; Jared Wels; Till Theilen; Selena Granitto; Xinmin Zhang; Jesse Cotari; Mary L Alpaugh; Elisa de Stanchina; Katia Manova; Ming Li; Massimiliano Bonafe; Claudio Ceccarelli; Mario Taffurelli; Donatella Santini; Gregoire Altan-Bonnet; Rosandra Kaplan; Larry Norton; Norihiro Nishimoto; Dennis Huszar; David Lyden; Jacqueline Bromberg Journal: Neoplasia Date: 2013-07 Impact factor: 5.715
Authors: Beatrice Grabner; Daniel Schramek; Kristina M Mueller; Herwig P Moll; Jasmin Svinka; Thomas Hoffmann; Eva Bauer; Leander Blaas; Natascha Hruschka; Katalin Zboray; Patricia Stiedl; Harini Nivarthi; Edith Bogner; Wolfgang Gruber; Thomas Mohr; Ralf Harun Zwick; Lukas Kenner; Valeria Poli; Fritz Aberger; Dagmar Stoiber; Gerda Egger; Harald Esterbauer; Johannes Zuber; Richard Moriggl; Robert Eferl; Balázs Győrffy; Josef M Penninger; Helmut Popper; Emilio Casanova Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2015-03-03 Impact factor: 14.919
Authors: Rui Huang; Dana Faratian; Andrew H Sims; Danielle Wilson; Jeremy S Thomas; David J Harrison; Simon P Langdon Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-04-11 Impact factor: 3.240