Literature DB >> 22374310

Sensitivity of hip tissues contact evaluation to the methods used for estimating the hip joint center of rotation.

Ehsan Arbabi1, Jerome Schmid, Ronan Boulic, Daniel Thalmann, Nadia Magnenat-Thalmann.   

Abstract

Computer-based simulations of human hip joints generally include investigating contacts happening among soft or hard tissues during hip movement. In many cases, hip movement is approximated as rotation about an estimated hip center. In this paper, we investigate the effect of different methods used for estimating hip joint center of rotation on the results acquired from hip simulation. For this reason, we use three dimensional models of hip tissues reconstructed from MRI datasets of 10 subjects, and estimate their center of rotation by applying five different methods (including both predictive and functional approaches). Then, we calculate the amount of angular and radial penetrations that happen among three dimensional meshes of cartilages, labrum, and femur bone, when hip is rotating about different estimated centers of rotation. The results indicate that hip simulation can be highly affected by the method used for estimating hip center of rotation. However, under some conditions (e.g. when Adduction or External Rotation are considered) we can expect to have a more robust simulation. In addition, it was observed that applying some methods (e.g. the predictive approach based on acetabulum) may result in less robust simulation, comparing to the other methods.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22374310     DOI: 10.1007/s11517-012-0873-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput        ISSN: 0140-0118            Impact factor:   2.602


  22 in total

1.  Radiographic and non-invasive determination of the hip joint center location: effect on hip joint moments.

Authors:  R N Kirkwood; E G Culham; P Costigan
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 2.063

2.  A layered model of a virtual human intestine for surgery simulation.

Authors:  L France; J Lenoir; A Angelidis; P Meseure; M-P Cani; F Faure; C Chaillou
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2004-12-22       Impact factor: 8.545

3.  Surgical treatment of femoroacetabular impingement: evaluation of the effect of the size of the resection.

Authors:  Rodrigo M Mardones; Carlos Gonzalez; Qingshan Chen; Mark Zobitz; Kenton R Kaufman; Robert T Trousdale
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  Creating and simulating skeletal muscle from the visible human data set.

Authors:  Joseph Teran; Eftychios Sifakis; Silvia S Blemker; Victor Ng-Thow-Hing; Cynthia Lau; Ronald Fedkiw
Journal:  IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph       Date:  2005 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.579

5.  Derivation of centers and axes of rotation for wrist and fingers in a hand kinematic model: methods and reliability results.

Authors:  P Cerveri; N Lopomo; A Pedotti; G Ferrigno
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 3.934

6.  Efficient collision detection within deforming spherical sliding contact.

Authors:  Anderson Maciel; Ronan Boulic; Daniel Thalmann
Journal:  IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph       Date:  2007 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.579

7.  Fast collision detection methods for joint surfaces.

Authors:  Ehsan Arbabi; Ronan Boulic; Daniel Thalmann
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2008-12-04       Impact factor: 2.712

8.  MRI bone segmentation using deformable models and shape priors.

Authors:  Jérome Schmid; Nadia Magnenat-Thalmann
Journal:  Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv       Date:  2008

9.  Hip joint center location by fitting conchoid shape to the acetabular rim region of MR images.

Authors:  MyungJin Kang
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2004

10.  Evaluation of formal methods in hip joint center assessment: an in vitro analysis.

Authors:  Nicola Lopomo; Lei Sun; Stefano Zaffagnini; Giovanni Giordano; Marc R Safran
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2009-12-14       Impact factor: 2.063

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.