Literature DB >> 22372213

Exploring variations in lung cancer care across the UK--the 'story so far' for the National Lung Cancer Audit.

P Beckett1, I Woolhouse, R Stanley, M D Peake.   

Abstract

The National Lung Cancer Audit was developed to improve the quality and outcomes of services for patients with lung cancer, knowing that outcomes vary widely across the UK and are poor compared to other western countries. After five years the audit is capturing approximately 100% of the expected number of incident cases across hospitals in England, Wales, Scotland, Northern Ireland and Jersey. Measures of process and outcome have improved over the audit period, such as the histological confirmation rate (64-76%), the proportion of patients discussed in a multidisciplinary team meeting (78-94%), and the proportion of patients having anti-cancer treatment (43-59%), surgical resection (9-14%) and small cell lung cancer chemotherapy (58-66%). These national averages hide wide variations between hospitals providing lung cancer care which cannot be accounted for by differences in casemix. This paper describes the evolution of the audit, and describes the ways in which it may have improved clinical practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22372213      PMCID: PMC4953408          DOI: 10.7861/clinmedicine.12-1-14

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Med (Lond)        ISSN: 1470-2118            Impact factor:   2.659


  6 in total

1.  Diagnosing lung cancer earlier in the UK.

Authors:  Richard B Hubbard; David R Baldwin
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 9.139

2.  The fruits of our efforts: time for a different view of lung cancer and CT screening.

Authors:  Frank Detterbeck
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 9.139

3.  Lung cancer in England: information from the National Lung Cancer Audit (LUCADA).

Authors:  Anna L Rich; Laila J Tata; Rosamund A Stanley; Catherine M Free; Michael D Peake; David R Baldwin; Richard B Hubbard
Journal:  Lung Cancer       Date:  2010-08-04       Impact factor: 5.705

4.  Toxicity and response criteria of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group.

Authors:  M M Oken; R H Creech; D C Tormey; J Horton; T E Davis; E T McFadden; P P Carbone
Journal:  Am J Clin Oncol       Date:  1982-12       Impact factor: 2.339

5.  Lung cancer in Teesside (UK) and Varese (Italy): a comparison of management and survival.

Authors:  A Imperatori; R N Harrison; D N Leitch; F Rovera; G Lepore; G Dionigi; P Sutton; L Dominioni
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2005-11-11       Impact factor: 9.139

6.  A visual summary of the EUROCARE-4 results: a UK perspective.

Authors:  H Møller; K M Linklater; D Robinson
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2009-12-03       Impact factor: 7.640

  6 in total
  14 in total

1.  Cancer and heart disease: new bedfellows in the cardiovascular landscape.

Authors:  David Adlam; Michael D Peake
Journal:  Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes       Date:  2017-07-01

2.  A systematic review of geographical variation in access to chemotherapy.

Authors:  Charlotte Chamberlain; Amanda Owen-Smith; Jenny Donovan; William Hollingworth
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2015-12-31       Impact factor: 4.430

3.  A multicentre randomised controlled trial of reciprocal lung cancer peer review and supported quality improvement: results from the improving lung cancer outcomes project.

Authors:  G K Russell; S Jimenez; L Martin; R Stanley; M D Peake; I Woolhouse
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2014-03-20       Impact factor: 7.640

4.  Teamwork in skull base surgery: An avenue for improvement in patient care.

Authors:  Nancy McLaughlin; Ricardo L Carrau; Daniel F Kelly; Daniel M Prevedello; Amin B Kassam
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2013-03-25

5.  Is England closing the international gap in cancer survival?

Authors:  Sarah Walters; Sara Benitez-Majano; Patrick Muller; Michel P Coleman; Claudia Allemani; John Butler; Mick Peake; Marianne Grønlie Guren; Bengt Glimelius; Stefan Bergström; Lars Påhlman; Bernard Rachet
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2015-08-04       Impact factor: 7.640

6.  Lung Cancer Assistant: a hybrid clinical decision support application for lung cancer care.

Authors:  M Berkan Sesen; Michael D Peake; Rene Banares-Alcantara; Donald Tse; Timor Kadir; Roz Stanley; Fergus Gleeson; Michael Brady
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2014-09-06       Impact factor: 4.118

7.  Optimising the community-based approach to healthcare improvement: Comparative case studies of the clinical community model in practice.

Authors:  Emma-Louise Aveling; Graham Martin; Georgia Herbert; Natalie Armstrong
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2016-11-22       Impact factor: 4.634

8.  Patient characteristics, treatment and survival in pulmonary carcinoid tumours: an analysis from the UK National Lung Cancer Audit.

Authors:  Stephanie Hobbins; Doug West; Michael Peake; Paul Beckett; Ian Woolhouse
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-09-27       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  Sociodemographic variation in the use of chemotherapy and radiotherapy in patients with stage IV lung, oesophageal, stomach and pancreatic cancer: evidence from population-based data in England during 2013-2014.

Authors:  Katherine E Henson; Anna Fry; Georgios Lyratzopoulos; Michael Peake; Keith J Roberts; Sean McPhail
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2018-05-10       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Can the completeness of radiological cancer staging reports be improved using proforma reporting? A prospective multicentre non-blinded interventional study across 21 centres in the UK.

Authors:  Anisha Patel; Andrea Rockall; Ashley Guthrie; Fergus Gleeson; Sylvia Worthy; Sisa Grubnic; David Burling; Clare Allen; Anwar Padhani; Brendan Carey; Peter Cavanagh; Michael D Peake; Gina Brown
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-10-02       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.