Literature DB >> 18445214

Medial orbitofrontal cortex codes relative rather than absolute value of financial rewards in humans.

R Elliott1, Z Agnew, J F W Deakin.   

Abstract

Functional imaging studies in recent years have confirmed the involvement of orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) in human reward processing and have suggested that OFC responses are context-dependent. A seminal electrophysiological experiment in primates taught animals to associate abstract visual stimuli with differently valuable food rewards. Subsequently, pairs of these learned abstract stimuli were presented and firing of OFC neurons to the medium-value stimulus was measured. OFC firing was shown to depend on the relative value context. In this study, we developed a human analogue of this paradigm and scanned subjects using functional magnetic resonance imaging. The analysis compared neuronal responses to two superficially identical events, which differed only in terms of the preceding context. Medial OFC response to the same perceptual stimulus was greater when the stimulus predicted the more valuable of two rewards than when it predicted the less valuable. Additional responses were observed in other components of reward circuitry, the amygdala and ventral striatum. The central finding is consistent with the primate results and suggests that OFC neurons code relative rather than absolute reward value. Amygdala and striatal involvement in coding reward value is also consistent with recent functional imaging data. By using a simpler and less confounded paradigm than many functional imaging studies, we are able to demonstrate that relative financial reward value per se is coded in distinct subregions of an extended reward and decision-making network.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18445214     DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2008.06202.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Neurosci        ISSN: 0953-816X            Impact factor:   3.386


  42 in total

Review 1.  The orbitofrontal cortex and the computation of subjective value: consolidated concepts and new perspectives.

Authors:  Camillo Padoa-Schioppa; Xinying Cai
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 5.691

2.  Adaptive coding of reward prediction errors is gated by striatal coupling.

Authors:  Soyoung Q Park; Thorsten Kahnt; Deborah Talmi; Jörg Rieskamp; Raymond J Dolan; Hauke R Heekeren
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-02-27       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Taking a different perspective: mindset influences neural regions that represent value and choice.

Authors:  Jamil P Bhanji; Jennifer S Beer
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2011-10-04       Impact factor: 3.436

4.  Appetitive and aversive goal values are encoded in the medial orbitofrontal cortex at the time of decision making.

Authors:  Hilke Plassmann; John P O'Doherty; Antonio Rangel
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-08-11       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 5.  Common and distinct networks underlying reward valence and processing stages: a meta-analysis of functional neuroimaging studies.

Authors:  Xun Liu; Jacqueline Hairston; Madeleine Schrier; Jin Fan
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2010-12-24       Impact factor: 8.989

6.  Dissociable regulation of instrumental action within mouse prefrontal cortex.

Authors:  Shannon L Gourley; Anni S Lee; Jessica L Howell; Christopher Pittenger; Jane R Taylor
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2010-10-12       Impact factor: 3.386

7.  Available alternative incentives modulate anticipatory nucleus accumbens activation.

Authors:  Jeffrey C Cooper; Nick G Hollon; G Elliott Wimmer; Brian Knutson
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2009-10-20       Impact factor: 3.436

8.  Partial Adaptation to the Value Range in the Macaque Orbitofrontal Cortex.

Authors:  Katherine E Conen; Camillo Padoa-Schioppa
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-03-04       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Context effects on probability estimation.

Authors:  Wei-Hsiang Lin; Justin L Gardner; Shih-Wei Wu
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2020-03-05       Impact factor: 8.029

10.  Neural signatures of intransitive preferences.

Authors:  Tobias Kalenscher; Philippe N Tobler; Willem Huijbers; Sander M Daselaar; Cyriel M A Pennartz
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2010-06-09       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.