Literature DB >> 22371539

The early radiological results of the uncemented Oxford medial compartment knee replacement.

G J Hooper1, A R Maxwell, B Wilkinson, J Mathew, T B F Woodfield, I D Penny, P J Burn, C Frampton.   

Abstract

We carried out a prospective investigation into the radiological outcomes of uncemented Oxford medial compartment unicondylar replacement in 220 consecutive patients (231 knees) performed in a single centre with a minimum two-year follow-up. The functional outcomes using the mean Oxford knee score and the mean high-activity arthroplasty score were significantly improved over the pre-operative scores (p < 0.001). There were 196 patients with a two-year radiological examination performed under fluoroscopic guidance, aiming to provide images acceptable for analysis of the bone-implant interface. Of the six tibial zones examined on each knee on the anteroposterior radiograph, only three had a partial radiolucent line. All were in the medial aspect of the tibial base plate (zone 1) and all measured < 1 mm. All of these patients were asymptomatic. There were no radiolucent lines seen around the femoral component or on the lateral view. There was one revision for loosening at one year due to initial inadequate seating of the tibial component. These results confirm that the early uncemented Oxford medial unicompartmental compartmental knee replacements were reliable and the incidence of radiolucent lines was significantly decreased compared with the reported results of cemented versions of this implant. These independent results confirm those of the designing centre.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22371539     DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.94B3.27407

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br        ISSN: 0301-620X


  8 in total

1.  A semi-automated measurement technique for the assessment of radiolucency.

Authors:  E C Pegg; B J L Kendrick; H G Pandit; H S Gill; D W Murray
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2014-04-23       Impact factor: 4.118

Review 2.  Cementless fixation in medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a systematic review.

Authors:  S Campi; H G Pandit; C A F Dodd; D W Murray
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-07-19       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Cementless versus cemented Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: early results of a non-designer user group.

Authors:  B Kerens; M G M Schotanus; B Boonen; P Boog; P J Emans; H Lacroix; N P Kort
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-05-09       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  MRI Findings at the Bone-Component Interface in Symptomatic Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty and the Relationship to Radiographic Findings.

Authors:  Laura Jill Kleeblad; Hendrik A Zuiderbaan; Alissa J Burge; Mark J Amirtharaj; Hollis G Potter; Andrew D Pearle
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2018-08-23

5.  Cemented versus Uncemented Oxford Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: Is There a Difference?

Authors:  Burak Akan; Dogac Karaguven; Berk Guclu; Tugrul Yildirim; Alper Kaya; Mehmet Armangil; Ilker Cetin
Journal:  Adv Orthop       Date:  2013-12-09

6.  Results after Cementless Medial Oxford Unicompartmental Knee Replacement - Incidence of Radiolucent Lines.

Authors:  Benjamin Panzram; Ines Bertlich; Tobias Reiner; Tilman Walker; Sébastien Hagmann; Marc-André Weber; Tobias Gotterbarm
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-19       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Ten-year clinical and radiographic results of 1000 cementless Oxford unicompartmental knee replacements.

Authors:  Hasan R Mohammad; James A Kennedy; Stephen J Mellon; Andrew Judge; Christopher A Dodd; David W Murray
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2019-06-17       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Valgus subsidence of the tibial component in cementless Oxford unicompartmental knee replacement.

Authors:  A D Liddle; H G Pandit; C Jenkins; P Lobenhoffer; W F M Jackson; C A F Dodd; D W Murray
Journal:  Bone Joint J       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 5.082

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.